Recorded answers
5,993 recorded answers
How to approach it
Treat the task as a browsing problem rather than a memory test. Pick a few niches that reliably put numerals in titles, such as tabletop wargames, historical simulations, small-press card games and digital puzzle releases, then walk them mentally from the digits forward. Anything whose name opens with a year, a count or a code is a candidate. Read the exclusion clause closely before submitting: a numbered continuation is disqualified even when the number feels intrinsic, and a re-release that only adds a depth cue is equally out. Notice whether the numeral is written as a figure or as a word, since both formats circulate. Keep a shortlist and send only the entries that feel least likely to have been claimed by others, because obscurity is rewarded here far more than fame.
Get a hint
Start with the shelf of tabletop and card games, including barely translated imports, because that corner holds the largest share of number-bearing names.
A little more
Historical simulation and wargaming lean on dates, day counts and unit sizes, so titles built around a quantity are unusually plentiful in that aisle.
One step further
Skip the big-budget releases: the rarest finds are self-published rulebooks, tiny print runs and digital puzzlers whose names open with a numeral.
Reveal answers 5,993
- 1812: The Campaign of Napoleon in RussiaDeep Cut85points
- 1812: The Cradle of Steam RailwaysDeep Cut85points
- 1812: The Invasion of CanadaDeep Cut85points
- 1812!: War on the Great Lakes FrontierDeep Cut85points
- 1813: Napoleon's NemesisDeep Cut85points
- 1815, Scum of the Earth: The Battle of Waterloo Card GameDeep Cut85points
- 1815: The Waterloo CampaignDeep Cut85points
- 1821: The Struggle for FreedomDeep Cut85points
- 1822: The Railways of Great BritainDeep Cut85points
- 1822CADeep Cut85points
- 1822MXDeep Cut85points
- 1822PNWDeep Cut85points
- 1824: Austrian-Hungarian RailwayDeep Cut85points
- 1825 Unit 1Deep Cut85points
- 1826: Railroading in France and Belgium from 1826Deep Cut85points
- 1829 MainlineDeep Cut85points
- 1829 Northern BoardDeep Cut85points
- 1830Deep Cut85points
- 1830 CardgameDeep Cut85points
- 1832: The SouthDeep Cut85points
- 1836JrDeep Cut85points
- 1837: Rail Building in the Austro-Hungarian EmpireDeep Cut85points
- 1840: Vienna TramwaysDeep Cut85points
- 1841: Railways in Northern ItalyDeep Cut85points
- 1842: Schleswig HolsteinDeep Cut85points
- 1844: SchweizDeep Cut85points
- 1846Deep Cut85points
- 1847: PfalzDeep Cut85points
- 1848: AustraliaDeep Cut85points
- 1849: The Game of Sicilian RailwaysDeep Cut85points
- 1850: The MidWestDeep Cut85points
- 1851 AgidingbiDeep Cut85points
- 1851: Kentucky & TennesseeDeep Cut85points
- 1856: Railroading in Upper Canada from 1856Deep Cut85points
- 1858: The Railways of IberiaDeep Cut85points
- 1860: Railways on the Isle of WightDeep Cut85points
- 1861: The Railways of the Russian EmpireDeep Cut85points
- 1862 War in VirginiaDeep Cut85points
- 1862: Railway Mania in the Eastern CountiesDeep Cut85points
- 1865: SardiniaDeep Cut85points
- 1866: The Struggle for Supremacy in GermanyDeep Cut85points
- 1867: The Railways of CanadaDeep Cut85points
- 187 Ride or DieDeep Cut85points
- 1870: Railroading Across the Trans Mississippi from 1870Deep Cut85points
- 1872: The Lost CrowsDeep Cut85points
- 1876: TrinidadDeep Cut85points
- 1877: Stockholm TramwaysDeep Cut85points
- 1877: VenezuelaDeep Cut85points
- 1879: US Pacific NorthwestDeep Cut85points
- 1880: ChinaDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
Points here track rarity rather than difficulty. The distribution is lopsided: one entry took 100, roughly 5,780 sat at 85 and only 117 stopped at 60, so the middle band is crowded and the gap between a good pick and a great one is small yet decisive. Almost every example shown lands at 85 — 0 A.D., 10 Days in Europe, 007 Racing, 1 vs. 100 — which tells you that a genuinely obscure title carrying a numeral clears the same bar whether it is strategy, tabletop or a licensed tie-in. Rarity pays because each answer's value rises as fewer players name it, so the winning move is something almost nobody would think to type. The lone 100-point answer, Pachisi, looks like an outlier settled by consensus weighting rather than by title format. The 60-point tail is made of entries enough people recognised to blunt the payoff, so avoid whatever a casual player reaches for first.