Recorded answers
14,853 recorded answers
How to approach it
Leaving your own vocabulary behind is the first move: head for glossaries of local speech, older editions and specialist registers that nobody reads for pleasure. Build candidates out of their letter skeleton rather than their sense, taking an awkward consonant frame, slotting open sounds into combinations that look impossible, then checking whether the result stands as a genuine headword. Keep score as you go and discard anything that proves to be a proper noun, an inflection of a longer word or a two-word phrase, since those three sink most attempts. Rarity drives the payoff, so whenever two candidates look equally solid, submit the one you have never met in print.
Get a hint
Weigh how vast a full wordbook is against how few of its five-letter inhabitants ever reach everyday speech; that unused majority is exactly the territory worth working.
A little more
Sort candidates by where they come from instead of by meaning: dialect glossaries, spellings abandoned centuries ago, occupational vocabulary and borrowings from far-off tongues all sit inside the accepted pool.
One step further
Judge a candidate by its letter frame before its sense: sour consonant clusters, odd runs of open sounds and endings that hardly ever close a word, then verify one attested entry rather than a derived variant.
Reveal answers 14,853
- volveDeep Cut85points
- vomerDeep Cut85points
- vougeDeep Cut85points
- vouluDeep Cut85points
- vowerDeep Cut85points
- voxelDeep Cut85points
- voxesDeep Cut85points
- vozhdDeep Cut85points
- vraicDeep Cut85points
- vrilsDeep Cut85points
- vrousDeep Cut85points
- vrouwDeep Cut85points
- vrowsDeep Cut85points
- vuggsDeep Cut85points
- vuggyDeep Cut85points
- vughsDeep Cut85points
- vughyDeep Cut85points
- vulgoDeep Cut85points
- vulnsDeep Cut85points
- vuttyDeep Cut85points
- vygieDeep Cut85points
- waacsDeep Cut85points
- wackeDeep Cut85points
- wacksDeep Cut85points
- wadasDeep Cut85points
- waddsDeep Cut85points
- waddyDeep Cut85points
- wadgeDeep Cut85points
- wadisDeep Cut85points
- wadtsDeep Cut85points
- waffsDeep Cut85points
- waggaDeep Cut85points
- wagyuDeep Cut85points
- wahayDeep Cut85points
- waheyDeep Cut85points
- wahooDeep Cut85points
- waideDeep Cut85points
- waiftDeep Cut85points
- wainsDeep Cut85points
- wairsDeep Cut85points
- waiteDeep Cut85points
- wakasDeep Cut85points
- wakerDeep Cut85points
- wakfsDeep Cut85points
- waldoDeep Cut85points
- waldsDeep Cut85points
- waledDeep Cut85points
- walerDeep Cut85points
- walesDeep Cut85points
- walieDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
Boldness outearns fluency in this reveal. Of the 14,855 recorded answers, 13,614 cleared the sixty-point bar, and the internal split is revealing: 10,213 stalled at 85, another 3,400 finished on 60, and a single answer reached 100. That summit belongs to qajaq, a spelling so outlandish that few players could produce it by accident, which is precisely why it pays. The 85 band is thronged with attested but rarely written entries such as aahed, abaca, abaft and abysm, words you only reach by prospecting outside everyday vocabulary on purpose. The 60 band gathers the familiar five-letter stock: valid, easy to recall, and therefore worth less. Correctness alone opens the door; the score then measures how far a pick sits from the obvious, so a real entry with a peculiar look outranks a common word every time.