Recorded answers
36,048 recorded answers
How to approach it
The trick is to treat the prompt as a wide funnel rather than a popularity contest. Begin with the people you know best, then deliberately travel to countries whose politics rarely make headlines and reconstruct a name from a roster you remember. National legislatures publish member lists, so recall a chamber you have read about — a small assembly, a federal upper house, a coalition partner's bench — and pick a single sitting member. Verify mentally that the person holds office now, not a decade ago. Then consider the scoring logic: the puzzle rewards answers that many people can confirm but few will think of, so an accurate, verifiable name from an overlooked country beats a famous one almost every time.
Get a hint
Start at the very top of the executive ladder: heads of government, their deputies and the senior ministers who were in office this week.
A little more
Narrow by chamber instead: a single seat in a national legislature is enough, so think of backbenchers, whips and committee chairs as well as speakers.
One step further
Go for depth over fame: a member of a small national assembly or a junior minister in a country that rarely makes the news usually scores higher than a household-name premier.
Reveal answers 36,048
- Carlos Pereira RieveDeep Cut85points
- Carlos Pérez-Desoy FagesDeep Cut85points
- Carlos Pinto PereiraDeep Cut85points
- Carlos PortinhoDeep Cut85points
- Carlos PrestiDeep Cut85points
- Carlos Rafael Fuentes LeónDeep Cut85points
- Carlos Ramiro Martinez AlvaradoDeep Cut85points
- Carlos Raúl ZapataDeep Cut85points
- Carlos ReyesDeep Cut85points
- Carlos Roberto Aguilar PinedaDeep Cut85points
- Carlos RodríguezDeep Cut85points
- Carlos Rojas AlarcónDeep Cut85points
- Carlos Rojas GarcíaDeep Cut85points
- Carlos RosenkrantzDeep Cut85points
- Carlos RydströmDeep Cut85points
- Carlos SaldañaDeep Cut85points
- Carlos SampaioDeep Cut85points
- Carlos Sánchez BarriosDeep Cut85points
- Carlos Silva SantiagoDeep Cut85points
- Carlos Silvestre Alarcon MondonioDeep Cut85points
- Carlos Steve Villacrés SalazarDeep Cut85points
- Carlos StockDeep Cut85points
- Carlos VarelaDeep Cut85points
- Carlos Ventura Palacios RodríguezDeep Cut85points
- Carlos VeraDeep Cut85points
- Carlos VerasDeep Cut85points
- Carlos VianaDeep Cut85points
- Carlos Vila NovaDeep Cut85points
- Carlos Xavier Luis LucasDeep Cut85points
- Carlos YaltaDeep Cut85points
- Carlos Yécora RocaDeep Cut85points
- Carlos ZarattiniDeep Cut85points
- Carlos ZegarraDeep Cut85points
- Carlotta AndruccioliDeep Cut85points
- Carlson D. ApisDeep Cut85points
- Carlyn ChisholmDeep Cut85points
- Carmel SepuloniDeep Cut85points
- Carmela AuriemmaDeep Cut85points
- Carmela BucaloDeep Cut85points
- Carmela Di LauroDeep Cut85points
- Carmela Paucara PaxiDeep Cut85points
- Carmelo AbelaDeep Cut85points
- Carmelo ColasantoDeep Cut85points
- Carmelo Cruz MendozaDeep Cut85points
- Carmelo Lazatin Jr.Deep Cut85points
- Carmelo Romero HernándezDeep Cut85points
- Carmen Alvarez RiveroDeep Cut85points
- Carmen Ballester FeliuDeep Cut85points
- Carmen Belén López ZapataDeep Cut85points
- Carmen CalvoDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
Scoring here is driven by rarity rather than prominence. The single hundred-point answer, Michael Dobbs, sits alone at the top precisely because almost nobody else named that individual, while the enormous 85-point band contains tens of thousands of sitting members drawn from national chambers across every continent, from A B M Mosharrof Hossain and A. A. Rahim to Aaron Bean and Abdoulaye Diop. Those answers were correct, current and specific enough to satisfy the checker, yet common enough among players that they landed in the second tier. Below them, the 60-point group of 328 answers was presumably made up of figures who were either extremely well known, slightly stale in office, or generically described in a way that reduced their value. The lesson is blunt: a verifiable backbencher from a legislature nobody discusses is worth more than a prime minister everyone recognises, and a precise full name outperforms a vague one.