Krillion Recorded answers
36,048 recorded answers
How to approach it
The trick is to treat the prompt as a wide funnel rather than a popularity contest. Begin with the people you know best, then deliberately travel to countries whose politics rarely make headlines and reconstruct a name from a roster you remember. National legislatures publish member lists, so recall a chamber you have read about — a small assembly, a federal upper house, a coalition partner's bench — and pick a single sitting member. Verify mentally that the person holds office now, not a decade ago. Then consider the scoring logic: the puzzle rewards answers that many people can confirm but few will think of, so an accurate, verifiable name from an overlooked country beats a famous one almost every time.
Get a hint
Start at the very top of the executive ladder: heads of government, their deputies and the senior ministers who were in office this week.
A little more
Narrow by chamber instead: a single seat in a national legislature is enough, so think of backbenchers, whips and committee chairs as well as speakers.
One step further
Go for depth over fame: a member of a small national assembly or a junior minister in a country that rarely makes the news usually scores higher than a household-name premier.
Reveal answers 36,048
- Christoph SternatDeep Cut85points
- Christoph StillebacherDeep Cut85points
- Christoph ThomaDeep Cut85points
- Christoph WenaweserDeep Cut85points
- Christoph WiederkehrDeep Cut85points
- Christoph ZaritsDeep Cut85points
- Christophe BentzDeep Cut85points
- Christophe BexDeep Cut85points
- Christophe BlanchetDeep Cut85points
- Christophe BombledDeep Cut85points
- Christophe BouchardDeep Cut85points
- Christophe ChaillouDeep Cut85points
- Christophe ClivazDeep Cut85points
- Christophe EickDeep Cut85points
- Christophe GuilloteauDeep Cut85points
- Christophe LacroixDeep Cut85points
- Christophe MarionDeep Cut85points
- Christophe MfiziDeep Cut85points
- Christophe MirmandDeep Cut85points
- Christophe MongardienDeep Cut85points
- Christophe NaegelenDeep Cut85points
- Christophe PlassardDeep Cut85points
- Christophe ProençaDeep Cut85points
- Christophe RobinoDeep Cut85points
- Christophe SoulardDeep Cut85points
- Christophe SteinerDeep Cut85points
- Christopher Andrew LangatDeep Cut85points
- Christopher Aseka WangayaDeep Cut85points
- Christopher BellamyDeep Cut85points
- Christopher BrownDeep Cut85points
- Christopher ChopeDeep Cut85points
- Christopher de SouzaDeep Cut85points
- Christopher DrößlerDeep Cut85points
- Christopher FoxDeep Cut85points
- Christopher GeidtDeep Cut85points
- Christopher GibbsDeep Cut85points
- Christopher GololoDeep Cut85points
- Christopher Gwabin MusaDeep Cut85points
- Christopher J. AndersonDeep Cut85points
- Christopher J. MahoneyDeep Cut85points
- Christopher Kajoro ChizaDeep Cut85points
- Christopher KibanzangaDeep Cut85points
- Christopher LandauDeep Cut85points
- Christopher LaNeveDeep Cut85points
- Christopher LaoreDeep Cut85points
- Christopher LennieDeep Cut85points
- Christopher LoweDeep Cut85points
- Christopher ManickamDeep Cut85points
- Christopher Manuel Jaramillo GómezDeep Cut85points
- Christopher MolefeDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
Scoring here is driven by rarity rather than prominence. The single hundred-point answer, Michael Dobbs, sits alone at the top precisely because almost nobody else named that individual, while the enormous 85-point band contains tens of thousands of sitting members drawn from national chambers across every continent, from A B M Mosharrof Hossain and A. A. Rahim to Aaron Bean and Abdoulaye Diop. Those answers were correct, current and specific enough to satisfy the checker, yet common enough among players that they landed in the second tier. Below them, the 60-point group of 328 answers was presumably made up of figures who were either extremely well known, slightly stale in office, or generically described in a way that reduced their value. The lesson is blunt: a verifiable backbencher from a legislature nobody discusses is worth more than a prime minister everyone recognises, and a precise full name outperforms a vague one.