Krillion Recorded answers
36,048 recorded answers
How to approach it
The trick is to treat the prompt as a wide funnel rather than a popularity contest. Begin with the people you know best, then deliberately travel to countries whose politics rarely make headlines and reconstruct a name from a roster you remember. National legislatures publish member lists, so recall a chamber you have read about — a small assembly, a federal upper house, a coalition partner's bench — and pick a single sitting member. Verify mentally that the person holds office now, not a decade ago. Then consider the scoring logic: the puzzle rewards answers that many people can confirm but few will think of, so an accurate, verifiable name from an overlooked country beats a famous one almost every time.
Get a hint
Start at the very top of the executive ladder: heads of government, their deputies and the senior ministers who were in office this week.
A little more
Narrow by chamber instead: a single seat in a national legislature is enough, so think of backbenchers, whips and committee chairs as well as speakers.
One step further
Go for depth over fame: a member of a small national assembly or a junior minister in a country that rarely makes the news usually scores higher than a household-name premier.
Reveal answers 36,048
- Chung Dong-youngDeep Cut85points
- Chung Il-youngDeep Cut85points
- Chung KyesunDeep Cut85points
- Chunnilal GarasiyaDeep Cut85points
- Chuol David DhelDeep Cut85points
- Chuol Kuajien Tut BolDeep Cut85points
- Chuol Rambang LuothDeep Cut85points
- Chuong Wan Rieth KuolDeep Cut85points
- Churchill Ewumbe MononoDeep Cut85points
- Churee NumkaeoDeep Cut85points
- Chusak KhirimatthongDeep Cut85points
- Chusak SirinillDeep Cut85points
- Chutharat NilpremDeep Cut85points
- Chuti KrairikshDeep Cut85points
- Chuy GarcíaDeep Cut85points
- Cian O'CallaghanDeep Cut85points
- Ciara FergusonDeep Cut85points
- Ciarán AhernDeep Cut85points
- Çiçek OtluDeep Cut85points
- Ciczie WeidbyDeep Cut85points
- Cid GomesDeep Cut85points
- Çiğdem Kılıçgün UçarDeep Cut85points
- Cikizwa LudwabeDeep Cut85points
- Cilia Adela FloresDeep Cut85points
- Cilla Dahl AnderssonDeep Cut85points
- Cina LawsonDeep Cut85points
- Cindy Chacon RodriguezDeep Cut85points
- Cindy Dayana Murillo ArtaviaDeep Cut85points
- Cindy Hyde-SmithDeep Cut85points
- Cindy KiroDeep Cut85points
- Cindy María Blanco GonzálezDeep Cut85points
- Cindy Quesada HernándezDeep Cut85points
- Cindy Winkler TrujilloDeep Cut85points
- Cinthia Mónica Puerta CamposDeep Cut85points
- Cinthia Olga Olguin MedinaDeep Cut85points
- Cinthya HawitDeep Cut85points
- Cintia Cuevas SánchezDeep Cut85points
- Cintya Lidia Ruiz FarfanDeep Cut85points
- Cinzia PellegrinoDeep Cut85points
- Ciprian CiubucDeep Cut85points
- Ciprian DobreDeep Cut85points
- Ciprian IacobDeep Cut85points
- Ciprian PandeaDeep Cut85points
- Ciprian ParaschivDeep Cut85points
- Ciprian-Constantin ȘerbanDeep Cut85points
- Ciprian-Titi StoicaDeep Cut85points
- Ciria Yamile Salomón DuránDeep Cut85points
- Cirilo Antonio Salas CastilloDeep Cut85points
- Cirilo Chol Dut NoonDeep Cut85points
- Cirino Hetieng OfuhoDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
Scoring here is driven by rarity rather than prominence. The single hundred-point answer, Michael Dobbs, sits alone at the top precisely because almost nobody else named that individual, while the enormous 85-point band contains tens of thousands of sitting members drawn from national chambers across every continent, from A B M Mosharrof Hossain and A. A. Rahim to Aaron Bean and Abdoulaye Diop. Those answers were correct, current and specific enough to satisfy the checker, yet common enough among players that they landed in the second tier. Below them, the 60-point group of 328 answers was presumably made up of figures who were either extremely well known, slightly stale in office, or generically described in a way that reduced their value. The lesson is blunt: a verifiable backbencher from a legislature nobody discusses is worth more than a prime minister everyone recognises, and a precise full name outperforms a vague one.