Krillion Recorded answers
36,048 recorded answers
How to approach it
The trick is to treat the prompt as a wide funnel rather than a popularity contest. Begin with the people you know best, then deliberately travel to countries whose politics rarely make headlines and reconstruct a name from a roster you remember. National legislatures publish member lists, so recall a chamber you have read about — a small assembly, a federal upper house, a coalition partner's bench — and pick a single sitting member. Verify mentally that the person holds office now, not a decade ago. Then consider the scoring logic: the puzzle rewards answers that many people can confirm but few will think of, so an accurate, verifiable name from an overlooked country beats a famous one almost every time.
Get a hint
Start at the very top of the executive ladder: heads of government, their deputies and the senior ministers who were in office this week.
A little more
Narrow by chamber instead: a single seat in a national legislature is enough, so think of backbenchers, whips and committee chairs as well as speakers.
One step further
Go for depth over fame: a member of a small national assembly or a junior minister in a country that rarely makes the news usually scores higher than a household-name premier.
Reveal answers 36,048
- Enkelejd AlibeajDeep Cut85points
- Enkh-Amgalan LuvsantserenDeep Cut85points
- Enkhbatyn BolormaaDeep Cut85points
- Enkhbayar BatshugarDeep Cut85points
- Enkhtaivan Bat-AmgalanDeep Cut85points
- Enn EesmaaDeep Cut85points
- Enoch GodongwanaDeep Cut85points
- Enoch Kiio WambuaDeep Cut85points
- Enock Kamzingeni ChihanaDeep Cut85points
- Enold JosephDeep Cut85points
- Enric Tarrado VivesDeep Cut85points
- Enric Xavier Morera CataláDeep Cut85points
- Enrica AlifanoDeep Cut85points
- Enrico BorghiDeep Cut85points
- Enrico CappellettiDeep Cut85points
- Enrico CarattoniDeep Cut85points
- Enrico CostaDeep Cut85points
- Enrico KomningDeep Cut85points
- Enrique Alemán GutiérrezDeep Cut85points
- Enrique Arnaldo AlcubillaDeep Cut85points
- Enrique Bassaletti RiessDeep Cut85points
- Enrique Buzarquis CaceresDeep Cut85points
- Enrique Cabrales BaqueroDeep Cut85points
- Enrique ConcepciónDeep Cut85points
- Enrique Erik YturriagaDeep Cut85points
- Enrique Fernando Santiago RomeroDeep Cut85points
- Enrique Gómez MartínezDeep Cut85points
- Enrique Inzunza CázarezDeep Cut85points
- Enrique LeeDeep Cut85points
- Enrique LluchDeep Cut85points
- Enrique ManaloDeep Cut85points
- Enrique Martín Goerling LaraDeep Cut85points
- Enrique MatuteDeep Cut85points
- Enrique RieraDeep Cut85points
- Enrique Rodriguez BurchardDeep Cut85points
- Enrique Ruiz EscuderoDeep Cut85points
- Enrique van RysselbergheDeep Cut85points
- Enrique Vargas del VillarDeep Cut85points
- Entesar Hamza JardanehDeep Cut85points
- Enyinnaya AbaribeDeep Cut85points
- Enzo Paolo FulloneDeep Cut85points
- Eoghan KennyDeep Cut85points
- Eoh Kiy-kuDeep Cut85points
- Eoin HayesDeep Cut85points
- Eoin Ó BroinDeep Cut85points
- Eóin TennysonDeep Cut85points
- Eom Tae-youngDeep Cut85points
- Epafras MukwiilongoDeep Cut85points
- Epaminondas MarinakysDeep Cut85points
- Epel IlonDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
Scoring here is driven by rarity rather than prominence. The single hundred-point answer, Michael Dobbs, sits alone at the top precisely because almost nobody else named that individual, while the enormous 85-point band contains tens of thousands of sitting members drawn from national chambers across every continent, from A B M Mosharrof Hossain and A. A. Rahim to Aaron Bean and Abdoulaye Diop. Those answers were correct, current and specific enough to satisfy the checker, yet common enough among players that they landed in the second tier. Below them, the 60-point group of 328 answers was presumably made up of figures who were either extremely well known, slightly stale in office, or generically described in a way that reduced their value. The lesson is blunt: a verifiable backbencher from a legislature nobody discusses is worth more than a prime minister everyone recognises, and a precise full name outperforms a vague one.