Krillion Recorded answers
36,048 recorded answers
How to approach it
The trick is to treat the prompt as a wide funnel rather than a popularity contest. Begin with the people you know best, then deliberately travel to countries whose politics rarely make headlines and reconstruct a name from a roster you remember. National legislatures publish member lists, so recall a chamber you have read about — a small assembly, a federal upper house, a coalition partner's bench — and pick a single sitting member. Verify mentally that the person holds office now, not a decade ago. Then consider the scoring logic: the puzzle rewards answers that many people can confirm but few will think of, so an accurate, verifiable name from an overlooked country beats a famous one almost every time.
Get a hint
Start at the very top of the executive ladder: heads of government, their deputies and the senior ministers who were in office this week.
A little more
Narrow by chamber instead: a single seat in a national legislature is enough, so think of backbenchers, whips and committee chairs as well as speakers.
One step further
Go for depth over fame: a member of a small national assembly or a junior minister in a country that rarely makes the news usually scores higher than a household-name premier.
Reveal answers 36,048
- Fernanda AvilaDeep Cut85points
- Fernanda CardonaDeep Cut85points
- Fernanda Deolinda Sumbo GuerraDeep Cut85points
- Fernanda DíazDeep Cut85points
- Fernanda Filomena dos SantosDeep Cut85points
- Fernanda Mabel Méndez RojasDeep Cut85points
- Fernanda MachiaveliDeep Cut85points
- Fernanda MelchionnaDeep Cut85points
- Fernanda MiñoDeep Cut85points
- Fernanda PessoaDeep Cut85points
- Fernando Adolfo Gutiérrez Díaz de OtazuDeep Cut85points
- Fernando Alberto García HubyDeep Cut85points
- Fernando Aldo SalinoDeep Cut85points
- Fernando AlexandreDeep Cut85points
- Fernando AmadoDeep Cut85points
- Fernando Andrés Bastidas CalderónDeep Cut85points
- Fernando Andrés López LarreynagaDeep Cut85points
- Fernando Aramayo CarrascoDeep Cut85points
- Fernando Arias CardonaDeep Cut85points
- Fernando BarrosDeep Cut85points
- Fernando Boyd GalindoDeep Cut85points
- Fernando Carbonell TatayDeep Cut85points
- Fernando CastroDeep Cut85points
- Fernando Coelho FilhoDeep Cut85points
- Fernando de AndreisDeep Cut85points
- Fernando de la Torre de la TorreDeep Cut85points
- Fernando De Rosa TornerDeep Cut85points
- Fernando Domingos Pedro MuanzaDeep Cut85points
- Fernando DueireDeep Cut85points
- Fernando Enrique Cedeño RivadeneiraDeep Cut85points
- Fernando García CasasDeep Cut85points
- Fernando González LlortDeep Cut85points
- Fernando Grande-MarlaskaDeep Cut85points
- Fernando Hombo DinisDeep Cut85points
- Fernando Jorge Castro TrentiDeep Cut85points
- Fernando Martínez-Maíllo ToribioDeep Cut85points
- Fernando MáximoDeep Cut85points
- Fernando Mendoza ArceDeep Cut85points
- Fernando MineiroDeep Cut85points
- Fernando MonguillotDeep Cut85points
- Fernando MonteiroDeep Cut85points
- Fernando Obaldía ÁlvarezDeep Cut85points
- Fernando Priego ChacónDeep Cut85points
- Fernando Puerto CastroDeep Cut85points
- Fernando QueirogaDeep Cut85points
- Fernando RabatDeep Cut85points
- Fernando RodolfoDeep Cut85points
- Fernando RospigliosiDeep Cut85points
- Fernando Torres GracianoDeep Cut85points
- Fernando Ugarte TejedaDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
Scoring here is driven by rarity rather than prominence. The single hundred-point answer, Michael Dobbs, sits alone at the top precisely because almost nobody else named that individual, while the enormous 85-point band contains tens of thousands of sitting members drawn from national chambers across every continent, from A B M Mosharrof Hossain and A. A. Rahim to Aaron Bean and Abdoulaye Diop. Those answers were correct, current and specific enough to satisfy the checker, yet common enough among players that they landed in the second tier. Below them, the 60-point group of 328 answers was presumably made up of figures who were either extremely well known, slightly stale in office, or generically described in a way that reduced their value. The lesson is blunt: a verifiable backbencher from a legislature nobody discusses is worth more than a prime minister everyone recognises, and a precise full name outperforms a vague one.