Krillion Recorded answers
36,048 recorded answers
How to approach it
The trick is to treat the prompt as a wide funnel rather than a popularity contest. Begin with the people you know best, then deliberately travel to countries whose politics rarely make headlines and reconstruct a name from a roster you remember. National legislatures publish member lists, so recall a chamber you have read about — a small assembly, a federal upper house, a coalition partner's bench — and pick a single sitting member. Verify mentally that the person holds office now, not a decade ago. Then consider the scoring logic: the puzzle rewards answers that many people can confirm but few will think of, so an accurate, verifiable name from an overlooked country beats a famous one almost every time.
Get a hint
Start at the very top of the executive ladder: heads of government, their deputies and the senior ministers who were in office this week.
A little more
Narrow by chamber instead: a single seat in a national legislature is enough, so think of backbenchers, whips and committee chairs as well as speakers.
One step further
Go for depth over fame: a member of a small national assembly or a junior minister in a country that rarely makes the news usually scores higher than a household-name premier.
Reveal answers 36,048
- Gérard Aristote ZaonariveloDeep Cut85points
- Gerard CraughwellDeep Cut85points
- Gérard DeltellDeep Cut85points
- Gerard HoganDeep Cut85points
- Gérard LahellecDeep Cut85points
- Gérard LarcherDeep Cut85points
- Gerard LemosDeep Cut85points
- Gérard LeseulDeep Cut85points
- Gérard SchockmelDeep Cut85points
- Gerardin Díaz MazariegosDeep Cut85points
- Gerardina Margarita Del Carmen Parada HernándezDeep Cut85points
- Gerardo Bogantes RiveraDeep Cut85points
- Gerardo Camps DevesaDeep Cut85points
- Gerardo CipoliniDeep Cut85points
- Gerardo Eugenio Machado ClavijoDeep Cut85points
- Gerardo Fernández NoroñaDeep Cut85points
- Gerardo GiovagnoliDeep Cut85points
- Gerardo Gustavo GonzálezDeep Cut85points
- Gerardo Hernández NordeloDeep Cut85points
- Gerardo HuesenDeep Cut85points
- Gerardo Izquierdo TorresDeep Cut85points
- Gerardo Olivares MejíaDeep Cut85points
- Gerardo PisarelloDeep Cut85points
- Gerardo SoteloDeep Cut85points
- Gerardo Ulloa PérezDeep Cut85points
- Gerardo Villarreal SolisDeep Cut85points
- Gerardo ZamoraDeep Cut85points
- Gérault VernyDeep Cut85points
- Geremew Garj GidaboDeep Cut85points
- Geremu Huluka AmanuDeep Cut85points
- Gereon BollmannDeep Cut85points
- Gergana KaradjovaDeep Cut85points
- Gergely GulyásDeep Cut85points
- Gergely MuhariDeep Cut85points
- Gergis TeklemichaelDeep Cut85points
- Gerhard AndreyDeep Cut85points
- Gerhard DeimekDeep Cut85points
- Gerhard HirschmannDeep Cut85points
- Gerhard KaniakDeep Cut85points
- Gerhard KarnerDeep Cut85points
- Gerhard KoornhofDeep Cut85points
- Gerhard PfisterDeep Cut85points
- Gerhard TrabertDeep Cut85points
- Gerlen BonillaDeep Cut85points
- Germain BiahodjowDeep Cut85points
- Germain Caballero VargasDeep Cut85points
- Germán AltamiranoDeep Cut85points
- Germán Andrés Rodríguez PrietoDeep Cut85points
- Germán Fajardo FríasDeep Cut85points
- Germán García DuránDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
Scoring here is driven by rarity rather than prominence. The single hundred-point answer, Michael Dobbs, sits alone at the top precisely because almost nobody else named that individual, while the enormous 85-point band contains tens of thousands of sitting members drawn from national chambers across every continent, from A B M Mosharrof Hossain and A. A. Rahim to Aaron Bean and Abdoulaye Diop. Those answers were correct, current and specific enough to satisfy the checker, yet common enough among players that they landed in the second tier. Below them, the 60-point group of 328 answers was presumably made up of figures who were either extremely well known, slightly stale in office, or generically described in a way that reduced their value. The lesson is blunt: a verifiable backbencher from a legislature nobody discusses is worth more than a prime minister everyone recognises, and a precise full name outperforms a vague one.