Krillion Recorded answers
36,048 recorded answers
How to approach it
The trick is to treat the prompt as a wide funnel rather than a popularity contest. Begin with the people you know best, then deliberately travel to countries whose politics rarely make headlines and reconstruct a name from a roster you remember. National legislatures publish member lists, so recall a chamber you have read about — a small assembly, a federal upper house, a coalition partner's bench — and pick a single sitting member. Verify mentally that the person holds office now, not a decade ago. Then consider the scoring logic: the puzzle rewards answers that many people can confirm but few will think of, so an accurate, verifiable name from an overlooked country beats a famous one almost every time.
Get a hint
Start at the very top of the executive ladder: heads of government, their deputies and the senior ministers who were in office this week.
A little more
Narrow by chamber instead: a single seat in a national legislature is enough, so think of backbenchers, whips and committee chairs as well as speakers.
One step further
Go for depth over fame: a member of a small national assembly or a junior minister in a country that rarely makes the news usually scores higher than a household-name premier.
Reveal answers 36,048
- Ghani BoudebouzDeep Cut85points
- Ghania EddaliaDeep Cut85points
- Ghanshyam TiwariDeep Cut85points
- Ghasem RavanbakhshDeep Cut85points
- Ghassan al-AbdullahDeep Cut85points
- Ghassan AttallahDeep Cut85points
- Ghassan HasbaniDeep Cut85points
- Ghassan SalaméDeep Cut85points
- Ghayath YazbeckDeep Cut85points
- Ghazala AnjumDeep Cut85points
- Ghazi Faisal BinzagrDeep Cut85points
- Ghazy ZaaiterDeep Cut85points
- Gheorghe CojocDeep Cut85points
- Gheorghe HajderDeep Cut85points
- Gheorghe IchimDeep Cut85points
- Gheorghe LeucaDeep Cut85points
- Gheorghe NacovDeep Cut85points
- Gheorghe PîclișanDeep Cut85points
- Gheorghe StanDeep Cut85points
- Gheorghe-Ioan BotaDeep Cut85points
- Ghervazen LongherDeep Cut85points
- Ghimbop JosephineDeep Cut85points
- Ghislain Ondias OkoumaDeep Cut85points
- Ghislain Thierry Maguessa EboméDeep Cut85points
- Ghislaine SenéeDeep Cut85points
- Ghizlane MarzoukiDeep Cut85points
- Gho Sze KeeDeep Cut85points
- Gholam Ali Safai BushehriDeep Cut85points
- Gholam Reza AghazadehDeep Cut85points
- Gholam-Ali Haddad-AdelDeep Cut85points
- Gholam-Hossein Mohseni-Eje'iDeep Cut85points
- Gholamhossein YadegariDeep Cut85points
- Gholamhossein ZareiDeep Cut85points
- Gholamreza Dehghan NaserabadiDeep Cut85points
- Gholamreza FayaziDeep Cut85points
- Gholamreza Mesbahi-MoghaddamDeep Cut85points
- Gholamreza MirzaeiDeep Cut85points
- Gholamreza MoghisehDeep Cut85points
- Gholamreza NavidiDeep Cut85points
- Gholamreza Nouri GhezeljehDeep Cut85points
- Gholamreza ShariatiDeep Cut85points
- Gholamreza TajgardoonDeep Cut85points
- Gholamreza TawakkulDeep Cut85points
- Ghoufran HammoucheDeep Cut85points
- Ghulam GhausDeep Cut85points
- Ghulam MuhammadDeep Cut85points
- Gia VolskiDeep Cut85points
- Giacomo CostaDeep Cut85points
- Giacomo Diego GattaDeep Cut85points
- Gian Antonio GirelliDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
Scoring here is driven by rarity rather than prominence. The single hundred-point answer, Michael Dobbs, sits alone at the top precisely because almost nobody else named that individual, while the enormous 85-point band contains tens of thousands of sitting members drawn from national chambers across every continent, from A B M Mosharrof Hossain and A. A. Rahim to Aaron Bean and Abdoulaye Diop. Those answers were correct, current and specific enough to satisfy the checker, yet common enough among players that they landed in the second tier. Below them, the 60-point group of 328 answers was presumably made up of figures who were either extremely well known, slightly stale in office, or generically described in a way that reduced their value. The lesson is blunt: a verifiable backbencher from a legislature nobody discusses is worth more than a prime minister everyone recognises, and a precise full name outperforms a vague one.