Krillion Recorded answers
36,048 recorded answers
How to approach it
The trick is to treat the prompt as a wide funnel rather than a popularity contest. Begin with the people you know best, then deliberately travel to countries whose politics rarely make headlines and reconstruct a name from a roster you remember. National legislatures publish member lists, so recall a chamber you have read about — a small assembly, a federal upper house, a coalition partner's bench — and pick a single sitting member. Verify mentally that the person holds office now, not a decade ago. Then consider the scoring logic: the puzzle rewards answers that many people can confirm but few will think of, so an accurate, verifiable name from an overlooked country beats a famous one almost every time.
Get a hint
Start at the very top of the executive ladder: heads of government, their deputies and the senior ministers who were in office this week.
A little more
Narrow by chamber instead: a single seat in a national legislature is enough, so think of backbenchers, whips and committee chairs as well as speakers.
One step further
Go for depth over fame: a member of a small national assembly or a junior minister in a country that rarely makes the news usually scores higher than a household-name premier.
Reveal answers 36,048
- Giovanni AmorosoDeep Cut85points
- Giovanni ArruzzoloDeep Cut85points
- Giovanni Azael Figueroa MejíaDeep Cut85points
- Giovanni CuperloDeep Cut85points
- Giovanni DonzelliDeep Cut85points
- Giovanni Francesco UgoliniDeep Cut85points
- Giovanni LopezDeep Cut85points
- Giovanni Luca CannataDeep Cut85points
- Giovanni Maria ZonziniDeep Cut85points
- Giovanni PitruzzellaDeep Cut85points
- Giovanni SattaDeep Cut85points
- Giovanny ZaldañaDeep Cut85points
- Giridhari YadavDeep Cut85points
- Giring GaneshaDeep Cut85points
- Giriraj SinghDeep Cut85points
- Girma AmenteDeep Cut85points
- Ģirts ŠtekerhofsDeep Cut85points
- Gisela ScagliaDeep Cut85points
- Gisela StuartDeep Cut85points
- Gisèle LelouisDeep Cut85points
- Gisella NaturaleDeep Cut85points
- Giselle CastelnuovoDeep Cut85points
- Giselle Yunueen Arellano ÁvilaDeep Cut85points
- Giselly Cruz SantoDeep Cut85points
- Gissel Santander SotoDeep Cut85points
- Gita ChaudharyDeep Cut85points
- Gita DevkotaDeep Cut85points
- Gita GurungDeep Cut85points
- Gita Kumari SendangDeep Cut85points
- Gita PlaudeDeep Cut85points
- Gitana SkripkaitėDeep Cut85points
- Gitanas NausėdaDeep Cut85points
- Gitta ConnemannDeep Cut85points
- Giulia BongiornoDeep Cut85points
- Giulia CosenzaDeep Cut85points
- Giulia MuratoriDeep Cut85points
- Giulia PastorellaDeep Cut85points
- Giulio CentemeroDeep Cut85points
- Giulio CentenaroDeep Cut85points
- Giulio Cesare SottanelliDeep Cut85points
- Giulio TremontiDeep Cut85points
- Giuliomaria Terzi Di Sant'AgataDeep Cut85points
- Giureci-Slobodan GheraDeep Cut85points
- Giuseppe Alesandro Martin Alessandrello CimadevillaDeep Cut85points
- Giuseppe BicchielliDeep Cut85points
- Giuseppe CastiglioneDeep Cut85points
- Giuseppe ConteDeep Cut85points
- Giuseppe Luciano Calogero ProvenzanoDeep Cut85points
- Giuseppe MangialavoriDeep Cut85points
- Giuseppe Maria MorgantiDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
Scoring here is driven by rarity rather than prominence. The single hundred-point answer, Michael Dobbs, sits alone at the top precisely because almost nobody else named that individual, while the enormous 85-point band contains tens of thousands of sitting members drawn from national chambers across every continent, from A B M Mosharrof Hossain and A. A. Rahim to Aaron Bean and Abdoulaye Diop. Those answers were correct, current and specific enough to satisfy the checker, yet common enough among players that they landed in the second tier. Below them, the 60-point group of 328 answers was presumably made up of figures who were either extremely well known, slightly stale in office, or generically described in a way that reduced their value. The lesson is blunt: a verifiable backbencher from a legislature nobody discusses is worth more than a prime minister everyone recognises, and a precise full name outperforms a vague one.