Recorded answers
36,048 recorded answers
How to approach it
The trick is to treat the prompt as a wide funnel rather than a popularity contest. Begin with the people you know best, then deliberately travel to countries whose politics rarely make headlines and reconstruct a name from a roster you remember. National legislatures publish member lists, so recall a chamber you have read about — a small assembly, a federal upper house, a coalition partner's bench — and pick a single sitting member. Verify mentally that the person holds office now, not a decade ago. Then consider the scoring logic: the puzzle rewards answers that many people can confirm but few will think of, so an accurate, verifiable name from an overlooked country beats a famous one almost every time.
Get a hint
Start at the very top of the executive ladder: heads of government, their deputies and the senior ministers who were in office this week.
A little more
Narrow by chamber instead: a single seat in a national legislature is enough, so think of backbenchers, whips and committee chairs as well as speakers.
One step further
Go for depth over fame: a member of a small national assembly or a junior minister in a country that rarely makes the news usually scores higher than a household-name premier.
Reveal answers 36,048
- Guido CrosettoDeep Cut85points
- Guido Quintino LirisDeep Cut85points
- Guilherme BoulosDeep Cut85points
- Guilherme DerriteDeep Cut85points
- Guilherme UchoaDeep Cut85points
- Guilhermina PrataDeep Cut85points
- Guillaume BigotDeep Cut85points
- Guillaume ChevrollierDeep Cut85points
- Guillaume Deschênes-ThériaultDeep Cut85points
- Guillaume FlorquinDeep Cut85points
- Guillaume GarotDeep Cut85points
- Guillaume GontardDeep Cut85points
- Guillaume Gouffier ValenteDeep Cut85points
- Guillaume KasbarianDeep Cut85points
- Guillaume Ngefa AtongokoDeep Cut85points
- Guillaume VDeep Cut85points
- Guillermo Antonio López Mac-LellanDeep Cut85points
- Guillermo Arturo Mendoza EguinoDeep Cut85points
- Guillermo CarazoDeep Cut85points
- Guillermo César AgüeroDeep Cut85points
- Guillermo Cifuentes BarragánDeep Cut85points
- Guillermo Eduardo AndradaDeep Cut85points
- Guillermo García FríasDeep Cut85points
- Guillermo Hita TéllezDeep Cut85points
- Guillermo Ignacio Alvira AcostaDeep Cut85points
- Guillermo León Blanco ValenciaDeep Cut85points
- Guillermo Marín GorbeaDeep Cut85points
- Guillermo Mariscal AnayaDeep Cut85points
- Guillermo MichelDeep Cut85points
- Guillermo MontenegroDeep Cut85points
- Guillermo Rafael Santiago RodríguezDeep Cut85points
- Guillermo Ralda CondeDeep Cut85points
- Guillermo Ramírez DiezDeep Cut85points
- Guillermo Rodriguez DureDeep Cut85points
- Guillermo ShinnoDeep Cut85points
- Guillermo SnopekDeep Cut85points
- Guillermo TolosaDeep Cut85points
- Guillermo Valdés CarmonaDeep Cut85points
- Guillermo Vicente Baez MeraDeep Cut85points
- Guindalina Suarez RodriguezDeep Cut85points
- Guislain CambierDeep Cut85points
- Guismala AmzaDeep Cut85points
- Guiswe BadomaDeep Cut85points
- Gul Asghar KhanDeep Cut85points
- Gul ZarinDeep Cut85points
- Gulam AliDeep Cut85points
- Gulbahor SaidgʻaniyevaDeep Cut85points
- Gülcan Kaçmaz SayyiğitDeep Cut85points
- Gülcan KışDeep Cut85points
- Gülderen VarlıDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
Scoring here is driven by rarity rather than prominence. The single hundred-point answer, Michael Dobbs, sits alone at the top precisely because almost nobody else named that individual, while the enormous 85-point band contains tens of thousands of sitting members drawn from national chambers across every continent, from A B M Mosharrof Hossain and A. A. Rahim to Aaron Bean and Abdoulaye Diop. Those answers were correct, current and specific enough to satisfy the checker, yet common enough among players that they landed in the second tier. Below them, the 60-point group of 328 answers was presumably made up of figures who were either extremely well known, slightly stale in office, or generically described in a way that reduced their value. The lesson is blunt: a verifiable backbencher from a legislature nobody discusses is worth more than a prime minister everyone recognises, and a precise full name outperforms a vague one.