Krillion Recorded answers
36,048 recorded answers
How to approach it
The trick is to treat the prompt as a wide funnel rather than a popularity contest. Begin with the people you know best, then deliberately travel to countries whose politics rarely make headlines and reconstruct a name from a roster you remember. National legislatures publish member lists, so recall a chamber you have read about — a small assembly, a federal upper house, a coalition partner's bench — and pick a single sitting member. Verify mentally that the person holds office now, not a decade ago. Then consider the scoring logic: the puzzle rewards answers that many people can confirm but few will think of, so an accurate, verifiable name from an overlooked country beats a famous one almost every time.
Get a hint
Start at the very top of the executive ladder: heads of government, their deputies and the senior ministers who were in office this week.
A little more
Narrow by chamber instead: a single seat in a national legislature is enough, so think of backbenchers, whips and committee chairs as well as speakers.
One step further
Go for depth over fame: a member of a small national assembly or a junior minister in a country that rarely makes the news usually scores higher than a household-name premier.
Reveal answers 36,048
- Jacob MkundaDeep Cut85points
- Jacob MudendaDeep Cut85points
- Jacob MwiimbuDeep Cut85points
- Jacob RisbergDeep Cut85points
- Jacobo Mendoza RuizDeep Cut85points
- Jacopo MorroneDeep Cut85points
- Jacque Assahore KonanDeep Cut85points
- Jacqueline AmonginDeep Cut85points
- Jacqueline Andrew KainjaDeep Cut85points
- Jacqueline BadranDeep Cut85points
- Jacqueline Chrisant MzindakayaDeep Cut85points
- Jacqueline Coromoto Faria PinedaDeep Cut85points
- Jacqueline de QuattroDeep Cut85points
- Jacqueline Eustache-BrinioDeep Cut85points
- Jacqueline FosterDeep Cut85points
- Jacqueline GleesonDeep Cut85points
- Jacqueline GouraultDeep Cut85points
- Jacqueline Ilogue BignoumbaDeep Cut85points
- Jacqueline Lydia MikoloDeep Cut85points
- Jacqueline TapullimaDeep Cut85points
- Jacquemain ShabaniDeep Cut85points
- Jacques BreillatDeep Cut85points
- Jacques DesrosiersDeep Cut85points
- Jacques Fame NdongoDeep Cut85points
- Jacques GourdeDeep Cut85points
- Jacques GrosperrinDeep Cut85points
- Jacques MargeryDeep Cut85points
- Jacques MézardDeep Cut85points
- Jacques NicoletDeep Cut85points
- Jacques ObertiDeep Cut85points
- Jacques RamsayDeep Cut85points
- Jacques RodrichDeep Cut85points
- Jacques Sosthene DingaraDeep Cut85points
- Jacques-Henry HeulsDeep Cut85points
- Jacqui LambieDeep Cut85points
- Jacqui SmithDeep Cut85points
- Jadambaagiin BayasgalanDeep Cut85points
- Jadambyn Bat-ErdeneDeep Cut85points
- Jadambyn EnkhbayarDeep Cut85points
- Jaddy Simai JaddyDeep Cut85points
- Jade BotterillDeep Cut85points
- Jaden Jada SolomonDeep Cut85points
- Jader BarbalhoDeep Cut85points
- Jader Barbalho FilhoDeep Cut85points
- Jadranka PockovaDeep Cut85points
- Jadyel AlencarDeep Cut85points
- Jafar HassanDeep Cut85points
- Jafar PourkabganiDeep Cut85points
- Jagadish Chandra Barma BasuniaDeep Cut85points
- Jagadish KharelDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
Scoring here is driven by rarity rather than prominence. The single hundred-point answer, Michael Dobbs, sits alone at the top precisely because almost nobody else named that individual, while the enormous 85-point band contains tens of thousands of sitting members drawn from national chambers across every continent, from A B M Mosharrof Hossain and A. A. Rahim to Aaron Bean and Abdoulaye Diop. Those answers were correct, current and specific enough to satisfy the checker, yet common enough among players that they landed in the second tier. Below them, the 60-point group of 328 answers was presumably made up of figures who were either extremely well known, slightly stale in office, or generically described in a way that reduced their value. The lesson is blunt: a verifiable backbencher from a legislature nobody discusses is worth more than a prime minister everyone recognises, and a precise full name outperforms a vague one.