Krillion Recorded answers
36,048 recorded answers
How to approach it
The trick is to treat the prompt as a wide funnel rather than a popularity contest. Begin with the people you know best, then deliberately travel to countries whose politics rarely make headlines and reconstruct a name from a roster you remember. National legislatures publish member lists, so recall a chamber you have read about — a small assembly, a federal upper house, a coalition partner's bench — and pick a single sitting member. Verify mentally that the person holds office now, not a decade ago. Then consider the scoring logic: the puzzle rewards answers that many people can confirm but few will think of, so an accurate, verifiable name from an overlooked country beats a famous one almost every time.
Get a hint
Start at the very top of the executive ladder: heads of government, their deputies and the senior ministers who were in office this week.
A little more
Narrow by chamber instead: a single seat in a national legislature is enough, so think of backbenchers, whips and committee chairs as well as speakers.
One step further
Go for depth over fame: a member of a small national assembly or a junior minister in a country that rarely makes the news usually scores higher than a household-name premier.
Reveal answers 36,048
- Jennie Bergius ErikssonDeep Cut85points
- Jennie CarignanDeep Cut85points
- Jennie NilssonDeep Cut85points
- Jennifer AyooDeep Cut85points
- Jennifer Carroll MacNeillDeep Cut85points
- Jennifer Geerlings-SimonsDeep Cut85points
- Jennifer HomendyDeep Cut85points
- Jennifer Kristel Parra SalasDeep Cut85points
- Jennifer LocettaDeep Cut85points
- Jennifer McClellanDeep Cut85points
- Jennifer McKelvieDeep Cut85points
- Jennifer Merelaid HankinsDeep Cut85points
- Jennifer Murnane-O'ConnorDeep Cut85points
- Jennifer NamuyanguDeep Cut85points
- Jennifer Noelia Guillen RodriguezDeep Cut85points
- Jennifer PedrazaDeep Cut85points
- Jennifer Sekang OlegeriilDeep Cut85points
- Jennifer WestfordDeep Cut85points
- Jennifer WhitmoreDeep Cut85points
- Jennifer Wicks McNamaraDeep Cut85points
- Jennifer Yabu LasubaDeep Cut85points
- Jenny ChapmanDeep Cut85points
- Jenny Cristina Samanez Gonzáles VigilDeep Cut85points
- Jenny Elina Cedeño MarquezDeep Cut85points
- Jenny GilruthDeep Cut85points
- Jenny JonesDeep Cut85points
- Jenny KwanDeep Cut85points
- Jenny MarcroftDeep Cut85points
- Jenny McAllisterDeep Cut85points
- Jenny Riddell-CarpenterDeep Cut85points
- Jenny SalesaDeep Cut85points
- Jenny YoungDeep Cut85points
- Jennyfer Del Carmen Villamizar OchoaDeep Cut85points
- Jens BehrensDeep Cut85points
- Jens Garðar HelgasonDeep Cut85points
- Jens HanefeldDeep Cut85points
- Jens Hartig DanielsenDeep Cut85points
- Jens Henrik Thulesen DahlDeep Cut85points
- Jens LehmannDeep Cut85points
- Jens LütkenhermDeep Cut85points
- Jens MeilvangDeep Cut85points
- Jens PeickDeep Cut85points
- Jens SpahnDeep Cut85points
- Jenti Poni BullenDeep Cut85points
- Jeon Hyun-heuiDeep Cut85points
- Jeon Jin-sookDeep Cut85points
- Jeon Jong-deokDeep Cut85points
- Jeon Yong-giDeep Cut85points
- Jeong Chun-saengDeep Cut85points
- Jeong Dong-manDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
Scoring here is driven by rarity rather than prominence. The single hundred-point answer, Michael Dobbs, sits alone at the top precisely because almost nobody else named that individual, while the enormous 85-point band contains tens of thousands of sitting members drawn from national chambers across every continent, from A B M Mosharrof Hossain and A. A. Rahim to Aaron Bean and Abdoulaye Diop. Those answers were correct, current and specific enough to satisfy the checker, yet common enough among players that they landed in the second tier. Below them, the 60-point group of 328 answers was presumably made up of figures who were either extremely well known, slightly stale in office, or generically described in a way that reduced their value. The lesson is blunt: a verifiable backbencher from a legislature nobody discusses is worth more than a prime minister everyone recognises, and a precise full name outperforms a vague one.