Krillion Recorded answers
36,048 recorded answers
How to approach it
The trick is to treat the prompt as a wide funnel rather than a popularity contest. Begin with the people you know best, then deliberately travel to countries whose politics rarely make headlines and reconstruct a name from a roster you remember. National legislatures publish member lists, so recall a chamber you have read about — a small assembly, a federal upper house, a coalition partner's bench — and pick a single sitting member. Verify mentally that the person holds office now, not a decade ago. Then consider the scoring logic: the puzzle rewards answers that many people can confirm but few will think of, so an accurate, verifiable name from an overlooked country beats a famous one almost every time.
Get a hint
Start at the very top of the executive ladder: heads of government, their deputies and the senior ministers who were in office this week.
A little more
Narrow by chamber instead: a single seat in a national legislature is enough, so think of backbenchers, whips and committee chairs as well as speakers.
One step further
Go for depth over fame: a member of a small national assembly or a junior minister in a country that rarely makes the news usually scores higher than a household-name premier.
Reveal answers 36,048
- Alejandro CanelasDeep Cut85points
- Alejandro CarrancioDeep Cut85points
- Alejandro Carvajal HidalgoDeep Cut85points
- Alejandro Castillo GaitanDeep Cut85points
- Alejandro De la Ossa LacayoDeep Cut85points
- Alejandro Esquer VerdugoDeep Cut85points
- Alejandro Evuna OwonoDeep Cut85points
- Alejandro FargosiDeep Cut85points
- Alejandro FinocchiaroDeep Cut85points
- Alejandro García GómezDeep Cut85points
- Alejandro García MonroyDeep Cut85points
- Alejandro Gertz ManeroDeep Cut85points
- Alejandro González YáñezDeep Cut85points
- Alejandro Jorge Reyes CareagaDeep Cut85points
- Alejandro Julian Lopez RamirezDeep Cut85points
- Alejandro KusanovicDeep Cut85points
- Alejandro Lopez RodriguezDeep Cut85points
- Alejandro Lorenzo Vanegas CortazarDeep Cut85points
- Alejandro ManayDeep Cut85points
- Alejandro Moreno CárdenasDeep Cut85points
- Alejandro Moscoso SegarraDeep Cut85points
- Alejandro MuñanteDeep Cut85points
- Alejandro Murat HinojosaDeep Cut85points
- Alejandro OxenfordDeep Cut85points
- Alejandro Redondo RamosDeep Cut85points
- Alejandro Riquelme DucciDeep Cut85points
- Alejandro SanchezDeep Cut85points
- Alejandro Soler MurDeep Cut85points
- Alejandro Torres Gómez De Cádiz HernándezDeep Cut85points
- Alejandro ZavalaDeep Cut85points
- Alejo Joaquín Miranda de Larra ArnaizDeep Cut85points
- Alejo Rios MedinaDeep Cut85points
- Alejo UmpiérrezDeep Cut85points
- Alek James Majok MajakDeep Cut85points
- Alekos TrifonidesDeep Cut85points
- Aleksa BečićDeep Cut85points
- Aleksandar JamalovDeep Cut85points
- Aleksandar Jovanović ĆutaDeep Cut85points
- Aleksandar KoychevDeep Cut85points
- Aleksandar MartinovićDeep Cut85points
- Aleksandar NikoloskiDeep Cut85points
- Aleksandar PopovDeep Cut85points
- Aleksandar VeljanovskiDeep Cut85points
- Aleksander IwanickiDeep Cut85points
- Aleksander JevšekDeep Cut85points
- Aleksander Mikołaj MrówczyńskiDeep Cut85points
- Aleksander Prosen KraljDeep Cut85points
- Aleksander ReberšekDeep Cut85points
- Aleksander StokkebøDeep Cut85points
- Aleksander ŠtorekDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
Scoring here is driven by rarity rather than prominence. The single hundred-point answer, Michael Dobbs, sits alone at the top precisely because almost nobody else named that individual, while the enormous 85-point band contains tens of thousands of sitting members drawn from national chambers across every continent, from A B M Mosharrof Hossain and A. A. Rahim to Aaron Bean and Abdoulaye Diop. Those answers were correct, current and specific enough to satisfy the checker, yet common enough among players that they landed in the second tier. Below them, the 60-point group of 328 answers was presumably made up of figures who were either extremely well known, slightly stale in office, or generically described in a way that reduced their value. The lesson is blunt: a verifiable backbencher from a legislature nobody discusses is worth more than a prime minister everyone recognises, and a precise full name outperforms a vague one.