Recorded answers
36,048 recorded answers
How to approach it
The trick is to treat the prompt as a wide funnel rather than a popularity contest. Begin with the people you know best, then deliberately travel to countries whose politics rarely make headlines and reconstruct a name from a roster you remember. National legislatures publish member lists, so recall a chamber you have read about — a small assembly, a federal upper house, a coalition partner's bench — and pick a single sitting member. Verify mentally that the person holds office now, not a decade ago. Then consider the scoring logic: the puzzle rewards answers that many people can confirm but few will think of, so an accurate, verifiable name from an overlooked country beats a famous one almost every time.
Get a hint
Start at the very top of the executive ladder: heads of government, their deputies and the senior ministers who were in office this week.
A little more
Narrow by chamber instead: a single seat in a national legislature is enough, so think of backbenchers, whips and committee chairs as well as speakers.
One step further
Go for depth over fame: a member of a small national assembly or a junior minister in a country that rarely makes the news usually scores higher than a household-name premier.
Reveal answers 36,048
- Jorge Antonio AvilaDeep Cut85points
- Jorge Antonio JacomeDeep Cut85points
- Jorge Armando Figueroa AngaritaDeep Cut85points
- Jorge Armando Ortiz RodríguezDeep Cut85points
- Jorge ArreazaDeep Cut85points
- Jorge Augusto Palacio GarzónDeep Cut85points
- Jorge Avalos MariñoDeep Cut85points
- Jorge Ayala MarroquínDeep Cut85points
- Jorge Barressi ManciaDeep Cut85points
- Jorge BloiseDeep Cut85points
- Jorge BrazDeep Cut85points
- Jorge Brito HasbúnDeep Cut85points
- Jorge Cabrera OrdóñezDeep Cut85points
- Jorge CálixDeep Cut85points
- Jorge CapitanichDeep Cut85points
- Jorge Carlos Ramírez MarínDeep Cut85points
- Jorge Castro DelgadoDeep Cut85points
- Jorge ChicaDeep Cut85points
- Jorge Díaz IbarraDeep Cut85points
- Jorge Domingo Martínez AntolínDeep Cut85points
- Jorge Enrique Chamba CabanillaDeep Cut85points
- Jorge Enrique IbáñezDeep Cut85points
- Jorge Enrique Sutil SarabiaDeep Cut85points
- Jorge Fabricio Tamayo TriviñoDeep Cut85points
- Jorge FernándezDeep Cut85points
- Jorge GalveiasDeep Cut85points
- Jorge García VegaDeep Cut85points
- Jorge GavidiaDeep Cut85points
- Jorge GoettenDeep Cut85points
- Jorge GonzálezDeep Cut85points
- Jorge Guzmán ZepedaDeep Cut85points
- Jorge Hernán Bastidas RoseroDeep Cut85points
- Jorge HerreraDeep Cut85points
- Jorge Inocêncio DomboloDeep Cut85points
- Jorge JallerDeep Cut85points
- Jorge KajuruDeep Cut85points
- Jorge Legañoa AlonsoDeep Cut85points
- Jorge Luis Aneiros AlonsoDeep Cut85points
- Jorge Luis Broche LorenzoDeep Cut85points
- Jorge Luis ChirinosDeep Cut85points
- Jorge Luis Fuguett NuñezDeep Cut85points
- Jorge Luis Guevara BenavidezDeep Cut85points
- Jorge Luis Quecano ColqueDeep Cut85points
- Jorge Luis Sánchez ReyesDeep Cut85points
- Jorge Luis Tapia FonsecaDeep Cut85points
- Jorge Luis Villatoro OsorioDeep Cut85points
- Jorge Martins da CruzDeep Cut85points
- Jorge Méndez HernándezDeep Cut85points
- Jorge MessiasDeep Cut85points
- Jorge Miguel TeixeiraDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
Scoring here is driven by rarity rather than prominence. The single hundred-point answer, Michael Dobbs, sits alone at the top precisely because almost nobody else named that individual, while the enormous 85-point band contains tens of thousands of sitting members drawn from national chambers across every continent, from A B M Mosharrof Hossain and A. A. Rahim to Aaron Bean and Abdoulaye Diop. Those answers were correct, current and specific enough to satisfy the checker, yet common enough among players that they landed in the second tier. Below them, the 60-point group of 328 answers was presumably made up of figures who were either extremely well known, slightly stale in office, or generically described in a way that reduced their value. The lesson is blunt: a verifiable backbencher from a legislature nobody discusses is worth more than a prime minister everyone recognises, and a precise full name outperforms a vague one.