Recorded answers
36,048 recorded answers
How to approach it
The trick is to treat the prompt as a wide funnel rather than a popularity contest. Begin with the people you know best, then deliberately travel to countries whose politics rarely make headlines and reconstruct a name from a roster you remember. National legislatures publish member lists, so recall a chamber you have read about — a small assembly, a federal upper house, a coalition partner's bench — and pick a single sitting member. Verify mentally that the person holds office now, not a decade ago. Then consider the scoring logic: the puzzle rewards answers that many people can confirm but few will think of, so an accurate, verifiable name from an overlooked country beats a famous one almost every time.
Get a hint
Start at the very top of the executive ladder: heads of government, their deputies and the senior ministers who were in office this week.
A little more
Narrow by chamber instead: a single seat in a national legislature is enough, so think of backbenchers, whips and committee chairs as well as speakers.
One step further
Go for depth over fame: a member of a small national assembly or a junior minister in a country that rarely makes the news usually scores higher than a household-name premier.
Reveal answers 36,048
- José Antonio Bermúdez de Castro FernándezDeep Cut85points
- José Antonio Carrillo GómezDeep Cut85points
- José Antonio ChangDeep Cut85points
- Jose Antonio Dos SantosDeep Cut85points
- Jose Antonio España MarquezDeep Cut85points
- José Antonio Gali LópezDeep Cut85points
- José Antonio Galindez VallesterDeep Cut85points
- Jose Antonio KastDeep Cut85points
- José António Lopes SemedoDeep Cut85points
- José Antonio López RuízDeep Cut85points
- José Antonio Monago TerrazaDeep Cut85points
- José Antonio Rivas VillalobosDeep Cut85points
- José Antonio Rodríguez SalasDeep Cut85points
- José Antonio SantanoDeep Cut85points
- José Antonio Valbuena AlonsoDeep Cut85points
- José AristaDeep Cut85points
- José Armando Fernández SamaniegoDeep Cut85points
- José BaellaDeep Cut85points
- José Barreira SoaresDeep Cut85points
- José BeaurainDeep Cut85points
- Jose Bernabe Gutierrez ParraDeep Cut85points
- José Braña MojicaDeep Cut85points
- José Carlo SolanoDeep Cut85points
- José Carlos Acosta RuizDeep Cut85points
- José Carlos BarbosaDeep Cut85points
- José Carlos Cruz SandovalDeep Cut85points
- José Carlos del Toro RíosDeep Cut85points
- Jose Carlos EstevesDeep Cut85points
- Jose Carlos MahiaDeep Cut85points
- José Carlos Meza PereiraDeep Cut85points
- José CarvalhoDeep Cut85points
- José CesárioDeep Cut85points
- José Chic CardonaDeep Cut85points
- José Crespo IglesiasDeep Cut85points
- José Cruceta AlmánzarDeep Cut85points
- Jose de Jesus Bermudez CarvajalDeep Cut85points
- José de Lima MassanoDeep Cut85points
- José Dias FernandesDeep Cut85points
- José Dionisio Brito RodríguezDeep Cut85points
- José do Gringo Júnior LembeDeep Cut85points
- José DottiDeep Cut85points
- José Durgués Espinosa MartínezDeep Cut85points
- José Elías Lixa AbimerhiDeep Cut85points
- José Emilio NederDeep Cut85points
- José Enrique GómezDeep Cut85points
- José Enrique Núñez GuijarroDeep Cut85points
- José Entrena ÁvilaDeep Cut85points
- José Federico TournierDeep Cut85points
- José Felipe Hernández PoloDeep Cut85points
- José Fernández BlancoDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
Scoring here is driven by rarity rather than prominence. The single hundred-point answer, Michael Dobbs, sits alone at the top precisely because almost nobody else named that individual, while the enormous 85-point band contains tens of thousands of sitting members drawn from national chambers across every continent, from A B M Mosharrof Hossain and A. A. Rahim to Aaron Bean and Abdoulaye Diop. Those answers were correct, current and specific enough to satisfy the checker, yet common enough among players that they landed in the second tier. Below them, the 60-point group of 328 answers was presumably made up of figures who were either extremely well known, slightly stale in office, or generically described in a way that reduced their value. The lesson is blunt: a verifiable backbencher from a legislature nobody discusses is worth more than a prime minister everyone recognises, and a precise full name outperforms a vague one.