Recorded answers
36,048 recorded answers
How to approach it
The trick is to treat the prompt as a wide funnel rather than a popularity contest. Begin with the people you know best, then deliberately travel to countries whose politics rarely make headlines and reconstruct a name from a roster you remember. National legislatures publish member lists, so recall a chamber you have read about — a small assembly, a federal upper house, a coalition partner's bench — and pick a single sitting member. Verify mentally that the person holds office now, not a decade ago. Then consider the scoring logic: the puzzle rewards answers that many people can confirm but few will think of, so an accurate, verifiable name from an overlooked country beats a famous one almost every time.
Get a hint
Start at the very top of the executive ladder: heads of government, their deputies and the senior ministers who were in office this week.
A little more
Narrow by chamber instead: a single seat in a national legislature is enough, so think of backbenchers, whips and committee chairs as well as speakers.
One step further
Go for depth over fame: a member of a small national assembly or a junior minister in a country that rarely makes the news usually scores higher than a household-name premier.
Reveal answers 36,048
- José Montalva FeuerhakeDeep Cut85points
- José MúcioDeep Cut85points
- José Narro CéspedesDeep Cut85points
- José NeltoDeep Cut85points
- José Nicolás Gómez MedinaDeep Cut85points
- José NuñezDeep Cut85points
- José Octavio Cardona LeónDeep Cut85points
- José Óscar RoblesDeep Cut85points
- José Óscar Villarroel GarcíaDeep Cut85points
- José OviedoDeep Cut85points
- Jose PandaDeep Cut85points
- José PatrícioDeep Cut85points
- José Pedro Aguiar-BrancoDeep Cut85points
- José PelucDeep Cut85points
- José Pérez BarboniDeep Cut85points
- José Pérez MarroquínDeep Cut85points
- José PrianteDeep Cut85points
- José Quezada VásquezDeep Cut85points
- Jose Rafael Belisario FloresDeep Cut85points
- José Rafael Morales GuarecucoDeep Cut85points
- José Ramón Cabellos ReinalesDeep Cut85points
- José Ramón Díez de Revenga AlbaceteDeep Cut85points
- José Ramón Gómez LealDeep Cut85points
- Jose Ramon IcazaDeep Cut85points
- José Ramón Machado VenturaDeep Cut85points
- José Ramón Monteagudo RuizDeep Cut85points
- José Ramos-HortaDeep Cut85points
- José Raúl MulinoDeep Cut85points
- José Ricardo Ardila PinedoDeep Cut85points
- José Roca HaenselDeep Cut85points
- José RochaDeep Cut85points
- José RodriguezDeep Cut85points
- Jose Rodriguez MacielDeep Cut85points
- José SabillónDeep Cut85points
- José Sabino Herrera DagdugDeep Cut85points
- José Sanabria AriasDeep Cut85points
- José Sánchez AguilarDeep Cut85points
- José SchulzDeep Cut85points
- José TangherliniDeep Cut85points
- José Toledo CruzDeep Cut85points
- José Tolentino de MendonçaDeep Cut85points
- José Trujillo PeñaDeep Cut85points
- José VallejoDeep Cut85points
- José Vicente Marí BosóDeep Cut85points
- José YatacoDeep Cut85points
- José Zaragoza AlonsoDeep Cut85points
- Josée LorschéDeep Cut85points
- Josée VernerDeep Cut85points
- Josef BaxaDeep Cut85points
- Josef DittliDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
Scoring here is driven by rarity rather than prominence. The single hundred-point answer, Michael Dobbs, sits alone at the top precisely because almost nobody else named that individual, while the enormous 85-point band contains tens of thousands of sitting members drawn from national chambers across every continent, from A B M Mosharrof Hossain and A. A. Rahim to Aaron Bean and Abdoulaye Diop. Those answers were correct, current and specific enough to satisfy the checker, yet common enough among players that they landed in the second tier. Below them, the 60-point group of 328 answers was presumably made up of figures who were either extremely well known, slightly stale in office, or generically described in a way that reduced their value. The lesson is blunt: a verifiable backbencher from a legislature nobody discusses is worth more than a prime minister everyone recognises, and a precise full name outperforms a vague one.