Krillion Recorded answers
36,048 recorded answers
How to approach it
The trick is to treat the prompt as a wide funnel rather than a popularity contest. Begin with the people you know best, then deliberately travel to countries whose politics rarely make headlines and reconstruct a name from a roster you remember. National legislatures publish member lists, so recall a chamber you have read about — a small assembly, a federal upper house, a coalition partner's bench — and pick a single sitting member. Verify mentally that the person holds office now, not a decade ago. Then consider the scoring logic: the puzzle rewards answers that many people can confirm but few will think of, so an accurate, verifiable name from an overlooked country beats a famous one almost every time.
Get a hint
Start at the very top of the executive ladder: heads of government, their deputies and the senior ministers who were in office this week.
A little more
Narrow by chamber instead: a single seat in a national legislature is enough, so think of backbenchers, whips and committee chairs as well as speakers.
One step further
Go for depth over fame: a member of a small national assembly or a junior minister in a country that rarely makes the news usually scores higher than a household-name premier.
Reveal answers 36,048
- Katerina SpyridakiDeep Cut85points
- Katerina StamatiouDeep Cut85points
- Kateřina StojanováDeep Cut85points
- Kateshumbwa DicksonsDeep Cut85points
- Kath PinnockDeep Cut85points
- Katharina BeckDeep Cut85points
- Katharina DrögeDeep Cut85points
- Katharina FegebankDeep Cut85points
- Katharina Prelicz-HuberDeep Cut85points
- Katharine BraddickDeep Cut85points
- Katharine MacGregorDeep Cut85points
- Katherina ReicheDeep Cut85points
- Katherine Alexandra Pacheco MachucaDeep Cut85points
- Katherine AmpueroDeep Cut85points
- Katherine ClarkDeep Cut85points
- Katherine GraingerDeep Cut85points
- Katherine HayDeep Cut85points
- Katherine Helen Guanipa MirandaDeep Cut85points
- Katherine SangsterDeep Cut85points
- Katherine ScarlettDeep Cut85points
- Kathia Calvo CruzDeep Cut85points
- Kathia Lizbeth Quiroga FernándezDeep Cut85points
- Kathia VerdierDeep Cut85points
- Kathiravelu Shanmugam KugathasanDeep Cut85points
- Kathleen DepoorterDeep Cut85points
- Kathrin BertschyDeep Cut85points
- Kathrin GebelDeep Cut85points
- Kathrin MichelDeep Cut85points
- Kathrin WahlmannDeep Cut85points
- Kathryn Joyce GorricetaDeep Cut85points
- Kathryn ParminterDeep Cut85points
- Kathuri MurungiDeep Cut85points
- Kathy BorrelliDeep Cut85points
- Kathy CastorDeep Cut85points
- Kathy LeachDeep Cut85points
- Kathy LieDeep Cut85points
- Kathy WillisDeep Cut85points
- Kati PiriDeep Cut85points
- Katia Alejandra Castillo LozanoDeep Cut85points
- Katia Arango AmadoDeep Cut85points
- Katiana LevavasseurDeep Cut85points
- Katie BaileyDeep Cut85points
- Katie HagmannDeep Cut85points
- Katie LamDeep Cut85points
- Katie MartinDeep Cut85points
- Katie NimonDeep Cut85points
- Katie WhiteDeep Cut85points
- Katja ChristDeep Cut85points
- Katja GabriëlsDeep Cut85points
- Katja MastDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
Scoring here is driven by rarity rather than prominence. The single hundred-point answer, Michael Dobbs, sits alone at the top precisely because almost nobody else named that individual, while the enormous 85-point band contains tens of thousands of sitting members drawn from national chambers across every continent, from A B M Mosharrof Hossain and A. A. Rahim to Aaron Bean and Abdoulaye Diop. Those answers were correct, current and specific enough to satisfy the checker, yet common enough among players that they landed in the second tier. Below them, the 60-point group of 328 answers was presumably made up of figures who were either extremely well known, slightly stale in office, or generically described in a way that reduced their value. The lesson is blunt: a verifiable backbencher from a legislature nobody discusses is worth more than a prime minister everyone recognises, and a precise full name outperforms a vague one.