Recorded answers
36,048 recorded answers
How to approach it
The trick is to treat the prompt as a wide funnel rather than a popularity contest. Begin with the people you know best, then deliberately travel to countries whose politics rarely make headlines and reconstruct a name from a roster you remember. National legislatures publish member lists, so recall a chamber you have read about — a small assembly, a federal upper house, a coalition partner's bench — and pick a single sitting member. Verify mentally that the person holds office now, not a decade ago. Then consider the scoring logic: the puzzle rewards answers that many people can confirm but few will think of, so an accurate, verifiable name from an overlooked country beats a famous one almost every time.
Get a hint
Start at the very top of the executive ladder: heads of government, their deputies and the senior ministers who were in office this week.
A little more
Narrow by chamber instead: a single seat in a national legislature is enough, so think of backbenchers, whips and committee chairs as well as speakers.
One step further
Go for depth over fame: a member of a small national assembly or a junior minister in a country that rarely makes the news usually scores higher than a household-name premier.
Reveal answers 36,048
- Alexandr TrubcaDeep Cut85points
- Alexandra AbrahamsDeep Cut85points
- Alexandra AnstrellDeep Cut85points
- Alexandra Borchio FontimpDeep Cut85points
- Alexandra BrenesDeep Cut85points
- Alexandra Edith Boero GarecaDeep Cut85points
- Alexandra FallaDeep Cut85points
- Alexandra FreemanDeep Cut85points
- Alexandra Hill TinocoDeep Cut85points
- Alexandra Martin (Alpes-Maritimes)Deep Cut85points
- Alexandra MendèsDeep Cut85points
- Alexandra PapadopoulouDeep Cut85points
- Alexandra Pineda OrtizDeep Cut85points
- Alexandra SchoosDeep Cut85points
- Alexandra Szalay-BobrovniczkyDeep Cut85points
- Alexandra VölkerDeep Cut85points
- Alexandre Allegret-PilotDeep Cut85points
- Alexandre BasquinDeep Cut85points
- Alexandre de MoraesDeep Cut85points
- Alexandre DufossetDeep Cut85points
- Alexandre GuimarãesDeep Cut85points
- Alexandre Homem CristoDeep Cut85points
- Alexandre LeiteDeep Cut85points
- Alexandre LindenmeyerDeep Cut85points
- Alexandre LoubetDeep Cut85points
- Alexandre OuizilleDeep Cut85points
- Alexandre PadilhaDeep Cut85points
- Alexandre PoçoDeep Cut85points
- Alexandre PortierDeep Cut85points
- Alexandre SabatouDeep Cut85points
- Alexandre SilveiraDeep Cut85points
- Alexandros AvlonitisDeep Cut85points
- Alexandros KazamiasDeep Cut85points
- Alexandros MarkogiannakisDeep Cut85points
- Alexandros MeikopoulosDeep Cut85points
- Alexandros ZerveasDeep Cut85points
- Alexandrosz PuroszDeep Cut85points
- Alexandru BordianDeep Cut85points
- Alexandru MachidonDeep Cut85points
- Alexandru MuraruDeep Cut85points
- Alexandru MusteataDeep Cut85points
- Alexandru NazareDeep Cut85points
- Alexandru PopaDeep Cut85points
- Alexandru RafilaDeep Cut85points
- Alexandru RogobeteDeep Cut85points
- Alexandru-Ioan AndreiDeep Cut85points
- Alexei BuzuDeep Cut85points
- Alexei DyuminDeep Cut85points
- Alexei GordeyevDeep Cut85points
- Alexei LyakhnovichDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
Scoring here is driven by rarity rather than prominence. The single hundred-point answer, Michael Dobbs, sits alone at the top precisely because almost nobody else named that individual, while the enormous 85-point band contains tens of thousands of sitting members drawn from national chambers across every continent, from A B M Mosharrof Hossain and A. A. Rahim to Aaron Bean and Abdoulaye Diop. Those answers were correct, current and specific enough to satisfy the checker, yet common enough among players that they landed in the second tier. Below them, the 60-point group of 328 answers was presumably made up of figures who were either extremely well known, slightly stale in office, or generically described in a way that reduced their value. The lesson is blunt: a verifiable backbencher from a legislature nobody discusses is worth more than a prime minister everyone recognises, and a precise full name outperforms a vague one.