Krillion Recorded answers
36,048 recorded answers
How to approach it
The trick is to treat the prompt as a wide funnel rather than a popularity contest. Begin with the people you know best, then deliberately travel to countries whose politics rarely make headlines and reconstruct a name from a roster you remember. National legislatures publish member lists, so recall a chamber you have read about — a small assembly, a federal upper house, a coalition partner's bench — and pick a single sitting member. Verify mentally that the person holds office now, not a decade ago. Then consider the scoring logic: the puzzle rewards answers that many people can confirm but few will think of, so an accurate, verifiable name from an overlooked country beats a famous one almost every time.
Get a hint
Start at the very top of the executive ladder: heads of government, their deputies and the senior ministers who were in office this week.
A little more
Narrow by chamber instead: a single seat in a national legislature is enough, so think of backbenchers, whips and committee chairs as well as speakers.
One step further
Go for depth over fame: a member of a small national assembly or a junior minister in a country that rarely makes the news usually scores higher than a household-name premier.
Reveal answers 36,048
- Lidia Rojas RojasDeep Cut85points
- Lidia ThorpeDeep Cut85points
- Lidia Vadim-TudorDeep Cut85points
- Lídice da MataDeep Cut85points
- Lidier Águila MachadoDeep Cut85points
- Lidio García TurbayDeep Cut85points
- Liene ApineDeep Cut85points
- Liene GātereDeep Cut85points
- Lieth Muoch TangDeep Cut85points
- Lieve TruymanDeep Cut85points
- Liew Chin TongDeep Cut85points
- Liezl van der MerweDeep Cut85points
- Līga KļaviņaDeep Cut85points
- Līga KozlovskaDeep Cut85points
- Līga MeņģelsoneDeep Cut85points
- Ligita GintereDeep Cut85points
- Ligita GirskienėDeep Cut85points
- Liina KersnaDeep Cut85points
- Lil Medina LafertéDeep Cut85points
- Lila Beatriz Brazon SalazarDeep Cut85points
- Lila Kumari BhandariDeep Cut85points
- Lila Marianela Prado VallejosDeep Cut85points
- Lila RatsifandrihamananaDeep Cut85points
- Lilani BrinkmanDeep Cut85points
- Lili AndréDeep Cut85points
- Lilia Aguilar GilDeep Cut85points
- Lilia BatistaDeep Cut85points
- Lilia LemoineDeep Cut85points
- Lilia María Hernández DoejóDeep Cut85points
- Liliam Mendoza EstradaDeep Cut85points
- Lilian Achieng GogoDeep Cut85points
- Lilian Betancurt DelgadoDeep Cut85points
- Lilian CarpDeep Cut85points
- Lilian GreenwoodDeep Cut85points
- Lilian Herberty Brook RangoDeep Cut85points
- Lilian ManagaDeep Cut85points
- Lilian SamaniegoDeep Cut85points
- Lilian SiyoiDeep Cut85points
- Liliana Carbajal MéndezDeep Cut85points
- Liliana Coromoto GonzálezDeep Cut85points
- Liliana Elizabeth Durán AguilarDeep Cut85points
- Liliana FidalgoDeep Cut85points
- Liliána GrexaDeep Cut85points
- Liliana GrosuDeep Cut85points
- Liliana Marcela Villena RomeroDeep Cut85points
- Liliana Mary Nancy Echenique SanchezDeep Cut85points
- Liliana Milagros Takayama JiménezDeep Cut85points
- Liliana Nicolaescu-OnofreiDeep Cut85points
- Liliana Ortiz PérezDeep Cut85points
- Liliana SegreDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
Scoring here is driven by rarity rather than prominence. The single hundred-point answer, Michael Dobbs, sits alone at the top precisely because almost nobody else named that individual, while the enormous 85-point band contains tens of thousands of sitting members drawn from national chambers across every continent, from A B M Mosharrof Hossain and A. A. Rahim to Aaron Bean and Abdoulaye Diop. Those answers were correct, current and specific enough to satisfy the checker, yet common enough among players that they landed in the second tier. Below them, the 60-point group of 328 answers was presumably made up of figures who were either extremely well known, slightly stale in office, or generically described in a way that reduced their value. The lesson is blunt: a verifiable backbencher from a legislature nobody discusses is worth more than a prime minister everyone recognises, and a precise full name outperforms a vague one.