Recorded answers
36,048 recorded answers
How to approach it
The trick is to treat the prompt as a wide funnel rather than a popularity contest. Begin with the people you know best, then deliberately travel to countries whose politics rarely make headlines and reconstruct a name from a roster you remember. National legislatures publish member lists, so recall a chamber you have read about — a small assembly, a federal upper house, a coalition partner's bench — and pick a single sitting member. Verify mentally that the person holds office now, not a decade ago. Then consider the scoring logic: the puzzle rewards answers that many people can confirm but few will think of, so an accurate, verifiable name from an overlooked country beats a famous one almost every time.
Get a hint
Start at the very top of the executive ladder: heads of government, their deputies and the senior ministers who were in office this week.
A little more
Narrow by chamber instead: a single seat in a national legislature is enough, so think of backbenchers, whips and committee chairs as well as speakers.
One step further
Go for depth over fame: a member of a small national assembly or a junior minister in a country that rarely makes the news usually scores higher than a household-name premier.
Reveal answers 36,048
- Mark PaolettaDeep Cut85points
- Mark PattersonDeep Cut85points
- Mark PettersonDeep Cut85points
- Mark PhillipsDeep Cut85points
- Mark PocanDeep Cut85points
- Mark PriceDeep Cut85points
- Mark PritchardDeep Cut85points
- Márk RadnaiDeep Cut85points
- Mark RuskellDeep Cut85points
- Mark SedwillDeep Cut85points
- Mark SewardsDeep Cut85points
- Mark SimpsonDeep Cut85points
- Mark StrahlDeep Cut85points
- Mark TakanoDeep Cut85points
- Mark TamiDeep Cut85points
- Mark TannerDeep Cut85points
- Mark TkaciukDeep Cut85points
- Mark VillarDeep Cut85points
- Mark WallDeep Cut85points
- Mark WardDeep Cut85points
- Mark WisemanDeep Cut85points
- Markku EestiläDeep Cut85points
- Markku SiponenDeep Cut85points
- Marko AsellDeep Cut85points
- Marko Cortés MendozaDeep Cut85points
- Marko ĐurićDeep Cut85points
- Marko KilpiDeep Cut85points
- Marko KovačevićDeep Cut85points
- Marko LokaleDeep Cut85points
- Marko Lolibas LojoreDeep Cut85points
- Marko LotričDeep Cut85points
- Marko MihkelsonDeep Cut85points
- Marko PavićDeep Cut85points
- Marko PrimoracDeep Cut85points
- Markos KafourosDeep Cut85points
- Markus AchatzDeep Cut85points
- Markus Campbell-SavoursDeep Cut85points
- Markus EdererDeep Cut85points
- Markus FrohnmaierDeep Cut85points
- Markus González BeilfussDeep Cut85points
- Markus GstöhlDeep Cut85points
- Markus HoferDeep Cut85points
- Markus KallifatidesDeep Cut85points
- Markus KoobDeep Cut85points
- Markus KozaDeep Cut85points
- Markus LeinfellnerDeep Cut85points
- Markus LohiDeep Cut85points
- Markus MarterbauerDeep Cut85points
- Markus MatzerathDeep Cut85points
- Markus PotzelDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
Scoring here is driven by rarity rather than prominence. The single hundred-point answer, Michael Dobbs, sits alone at the top precisely because almost nobody else named that individual, while the enormous 85-point band contains tens of thousands of sitting members drawn from national chambers across every continent, from A B M Mosharrof Hossain and A. A. Rahim to Aaron Bean and Abdoulaye Diop. Those answers were correct, current and specific enough to satisfy the checker, yet common enough among players that they landed in the second tier. Below them, the 60-point group of 328 answers was presumably made up of figures who were either extremely well known, slightly stale in office, or generically described in a way that reduced their value. The lesson is blunt: a verifiable backbencher from a legislature nobody discusses is worth more than a prime minister everyone recognises, and a precise full name outperforms a vague one.