Recorded answers
36,048 recorded answers
How to approach it
The trick is to treat the prompt as a wide funnel rather than a popularity contest. Begin with the people you know best, then deliberately travel to countries whose politics rarely make headlines and reconstruct a name from a roster you remember. National legislatures publish member lists, so recall a chamber you have read about — a small assembly, a federal upper house, a coalition partner's bench — and pick a single sitting member. Verify mentally that the person holds office now, not a decade ago. Then consider the scoring logic: the puzzle rewards answers that many people can confirm but few will think of, so an accurate, verifiable name from an overlooked country beats a famous one almost every time.
Get a hint
Start at the very top of the executive ladder: heads of government, their deputies and the senior ministers who were in office this week.
A little more
Narrow by chamber instead: a single seat in a national legislature is enough, so think of backbenchers, whips and committee chairs as well as speakers.
One step further
Go for depth over fame: a member of a small national assembly or a junior minister in a country that rarely makes the news usually scores higher than a household-name premier.
Reveal answers 36,048
- Marta González VázquezDeep Cut85points
- Márta GörögDeep Cut85points
- Marta Hernández RomeroDeep Cut85points
- Marta Jorgina Saavedra DoménechDeep Cut85points
- Marta LiwjiDeep Cut85points
- Marta Martins da SilvaDeep Cut85points
- Márta NagyDeep Cut85points
- Marta SchifoneDeep Cut85points
- Marta StożekDeep Cut85points
- Marta Varela PazosDeep Cut85points
- Marte GerhardsenDeep Cut85points
- Mårten BlixDeep Cut85points
- Marten KapewashaDeep Cut85points
- Martha Akon Deng RuarDeep Cut85points
- Martha Akuany DengDeep Cut85points
- Martha Amalia Moya BastónDeep Cut85points
- Martha Anthony DengDeep Cut85points
- Martha Aracely Cruz JiménezDeep Cut85points
- Martha Atong MansorDeep Cut85points
- Martha Ayuek YacDeep Cut85points
- Martha ChávezDeep Cut85points
- Martha del Carmen Mesa ValencianoDeep Cut85points
- Martha Dignó AguileraDeep Cut85points
- Martha Elena Ruiz SevillaDeep Cut85points
- Martha Isabel Peralta EpieyúDeep Cut85points
- Martha Isabel Ruiz SoleraDeep Cut85points
- Martha KoomeDeep Cut85points
- Martha Lane FoxDeep Cut85points
- Martha Lema TuluDeep Cut85points
- Martha Lucía Mícher CamarenaDeep Cut85points
- Martha Matin DarDeep Cut85points
- Martha Mena RodríguezDeep Cut85points
- Martha MoyanoDeep Cut85points
- Martha Nyanath ChotDeep Cut85points
- Martha Nyanuba SimonDeep Cut85points
- Martha Nyathir ChuolDeep Cut85points
- Martha Olivia García VidañaDeep Cut85points
- Martha OsamorDeep Cut85points
- Martha ReyesDeep Cut85points
- Martha Wangari WanjiraDeep Cut85points
- Marthe HammerDeep Cut85points
- Marthe KirimatDeep Cut85points
- Marti MolinsDeep Cut85points
- Martial NdoubouDeep Cut85points
- Martim SyderDeep Cut85points
- Martin ÅdahlDeep Cut85points
- Martín Alonso Caicedo CarabalíDeep Cut85points
- Martin AndjabaDeep Cut85points
- Martín Ángel Torres VallsDeep Cut85points
- Martín ArdohainDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
Scoring here is driven by rarity rather than prominence. The single hundred-point answer, Michael Dobbs, sits alone at the top precisely because almost nobody else named that individual, while the enormous 85-point band contains tens of thousands of sitting members drawn from national chambers across every continent, from A B M Mosharrof Hossain and A. A. Rahim to Aaron Bean and Abdoulaye Diop. Those answers were correct, current and specific enough to satisfy the checker, yet common enough among players that they landed in the second tier. Below them, the 60-point group of 328 answers was presumably made up of figures who were either extremely well known, slightly stale in office, or generically described in a way that reduced their value. The lesson is blunt: a verifiable backbencher from a legislature nobody discusses is worth more than a prime minister everyone recognises, and a precise full name outperforms a vague one.