Krillion Recorded answers
36,048 recorded answers
How to approach it
The trick is to treat the prompt as a wide funnel rather than a popularity contest. Begin with the people you know best, then deliberately travel to countries whose politics rarely make headlines and reconstruct a name from a roster you remember. National legislatures publish member lists, so recall a chamber you have read about — a small assembly, a federal upper house, a coalition partner's bench — and pick a single sitting member. Verify mentally that the person holds office now, not a decade ago. Then consider the scoring logic: the puzzle rewards answers that many people can confirm but few will think of, so an accurate, verifiable name from an overlooked country beats a famous one almost every time.
Get a hint
Start at the very top of the executive ladder: heads of government, their deputies and the senior ministers who were in office this week.
A little more
Narrow by chamber instead: a single seat in a national legislature is enough, so think of backbenchers, whips and committee chairs as well as speakers.
One step further
Go for depth over fame: a member of a small national assembly or a junior minister in a country that rarely makes the news usually scores higher than a household-name premier.
Reveal answers 36,048
- Martín MenemDeep Cut85points
- Martin MikoličDeep Cut85points
- Martin MoretiDeep Cut85points
- Martin MugarraDeep Cut85points
- Martín Nicolás SegundoDeep Cut85points
- Martin Odwar OnuhaDeep Cut85points
- Martin Ohuro OkerukDeep Cut85points
- Martin PaasiDeep Cut85points
- Martin PeterlDeep Cut85points
- Martin Peters OwinoDeep Cut85points
- Martin PfisterDeep Cut85points
- Martin PlumDeep Cut85points
- Martin PremkDeep Cut85points
- Martin PůtaDeep Cut85points
- Martin RabanusDeep Cut85points
- Martin RafidisonDeep Cut85points
- Martin ReesDeep Cut85points
- Martin ReichardtDeep Cut85points
- Martin RennerDeep Cut85points
- Martin RhodesDeep Cut85points
- Martin RomualdezDeep Cut85points
- Martín Sans PairutóDeep Cut85points
- Martin SchlegelDeep Cut85points
- Martin SchmidDeep Cut85points
- Martin ŠebestyánDeep Cut85points
- Martin SegerDeep Cut85points
- Martin SichertDeep Cut85points
- Martin ŠmídaDeep Cut85points
- Martin SmolekDeep Cut85points
- Martin TakoDeep Cut85points
- Martin ThomasDeep Cut85points
- Martin TlapaDeep Cut85points
- Martin van RooijenDeep Cut85points
- Martin VenhartDeep Cut85points
- Martin VickersDeep Cut85points
- Martin Virkesdal JonsterhaugDeep Cut85points
- Martin WestmontDeep Cut85points
- Martin WrigleyDeep Cut85points
- Martín YezaDeep Cut85points
- Martin ZáhořDeep Cut85points
- Martin ZhlyabinkovDeep Cut85points
- Martina Diesner-WaisDeep Cut85points
- Martina Englhardt-KopfDeep Cut85points
- Martina JohanssonDeep Cut85points
- Martina KempfDeep Cut85points
- Martina KlumppDeep Cut85points
- Martina Ludwig-FaymannDeep Cut85points
- Martina SemenzatoDeep Cut85points
- Martina ŠimkovičováDeep Cut85points
- Martina UhrDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
Scoring here is driven by rarity rather than prominence. The single hundred-point answer, Michael Dobbs, sits alone at the top precisely because almost nobody else named that individual, while the enormous 85-point band contains tens of thousands of sitting members drawn from national chambers across every continent, from A B M Mosharrof Hossain and A. A. Rahim to Aaron Bean and Abdoulaye Diop. Those answers were correct, current and specific enough to satisfy the checker, yet common enough among players that they landed in the second tier. Below them, the 60-point group of 328 answers was presumably made up of figures who were either extremely well known, slightly stale in office, or generically described in a way that reduced their value. The lesson is blunt: a verifiable backbencher from a legislature nobody discusses is worth more than a prime minister everyone recognises, and a precise full name outperforms a vague one.