Recorded answers
36,048 recorded answers
How to approach it
The trick is to treat the prompt as a wide funnel rather than a popularity contest. Begin with the people you know best, then deliberately travel to countries whose politics rarely make headlines and reconstruct a name from a roster you remember. National legislatures publish member lists, so recall a chamber you have read about — a small assembly, a federal upper house, a coalition partner's bench — and pick a single sitting member. Verify mentally that the person holds office now, not a decade ago. Then consider the scoring logic: the puzzle rewards answers that many people can confirm but few will think of, so an accurate, verifiable name from an overlooked country beats a famous one almost every time.
Get a hint
Start at the very top of the executive ladder: heads of government, their deputies and the senior ministers who were in office this week.
A little more
Narrow by chamber instead: a single seat in a national legislature is enough, so think of backbenchers, whips and committee chairs as well as speakers.
One step further
Go for depth over fame: a member of a small national assembly or a junior minister in a country that rarely makes the news usually scores higher than a household-name premier.
Reveal answers 36,048
- Maurice GlasmanDeep Cut85points
- Maurice Kakai BisauDeep Cut85points
- Maurice MorrowDeep Cut85points
- Maurice QuinlivanDeep Cut85points
- Maurice RoemerDeep Cut85points
- Maurice SaatchiDeep Cut85points
- Mauricio Alejandro Taboada OrtegaDeep Cut85points
- Mauricio Andrés Toro OrjuelaDeep Cut85points
- Mauricio ArnillasDeep Cut85points
- Maurício CarvalhoDeep Cut85points
- Mauricio do VôleiDeep Cut85points
- Mauricio EspinolaDeep Cut85points
- Mauricio Gómez-AmínDeep Cut85points
- Mauricio MarconDeep Cut85points
- Maurício MarquesDeep Cut85points
- Mauricio NevesDeep Cut85points
- Mauricio OrtizDeep Cut85points
- Mauricio RojasDeep Cut85points
- Mauricio Silva CancinoDeep Cut85points
- Mauricio VieraDeep Cut85points
- Mauricio Vila DosalDeep Cut85points
- Mauricio Xavier Ordoñez FuentesDeep Cut85points
- Mauricio Xavier Salazar MachucaDeep Cut85points
- Mauricio Zamora LiebersDeep Cut85points
- Maurisson RandrianarivonyDeep Cut85points
- Maurizio CasascoDeep Cut85points
- Maurizio GasparriDeep Cut85points
- Maurizio LeoDeep Cut85points
- Maurizio LupiDeep Cut85points
- Maurizio MassariDeep Cut85points
- Mauro Benevides FilhoDeep Cut85points
- Mauro BerrutoDeep Cut85points
- Mauro D'attisDeep Cut85points
- Mauro Del BarbaDeep Cut85points
- Mauro González VillarroelDeep Cut85points
- Mauro LausDeep Cut85points
- Mauro MalagutiDeep Cut85points
- Mauro PoggiaDeep Cut85points
- Mauro RotelliDeep Cut85points
- Mauro TuenaDeep Cut85points
- Mauro VieiraDeep Cut85points
- Maverick EoeDeep Cut85points
- Mavis Kuukua BissueDeep Cut85points
- Mavis Nkansah BoaduDeep Cut85points
- Mavludaxon AdhamjonovaDeep Cut85points
- Mavludaxon IbragimovaDeep Cut85points
- Maw Htun AungDeep Cut85points
- Mawanda Michael MarangaDeep Cut85points
- Mawien Dhor AriikDeep Cut85points
- Mäwlen ÄshimbaevDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
Scoring here is driven by rarity rather than prominence. The single hundred-point answer, Michael Dobbs, sits alone at the top precisely because almost nobody else named that individual, while the enormous 85-point band contains tens of thousands of sitting members drawn from national chambers across every continent, from A B M Mosharrof Hossain and A. A. Rahim to Aaron Bean and Abdoulaye Diop. Those answers were correct, current and specific enough to satisfy the checker, yet common enough among players that they landed in the second tier. Below them, the 60-point group of 328 answers was presumably made up of figures who were either extremely well known, slightly stale in office, or generically described in a way that reduced their value. The lesson is blunt: a verifiable backbencher from a legislature nobody discusses is worth more than a prime minister everyone recognises, and a precise full name outperforms a vague one.