Krillion Recorded answers
36,048 recorded answers
How to approach it
The trick is to treat the prompt as a wide funnel rather than a popularity contest. Begin with the people you know best, then deliberately travel to countries whose politics rarely make headlines and reconstruct a name from a roster you remember. National legislatures publish member lists, so recall a chamber you have read about — a small assembly, a federal upper house, a coalition partner's bench — and pick a single sitting member. Verify mentally that the person holds office now, not a decade ago. Then consider the scoring logic: the puzzle rewards answers that many people can confirm but few will think of, so an accurate, verifiable name from an overlooked country beats a famous one almost every time.
Get a hint
Start at the very top of the executive ladder: heads of government, their deputies and the senior ministers who were in office this week.
A little more
Narrow by chamber instead: a single seat in a national legislature is enough, so think of backbenchers, whips and committee chairs as well as speakers.
One step further
Go for depth over fame: a member of a small national assembly or a junior minister in a country that rarely makes the news usually scores higher than a household-name premier.
Reveal answers 36,048
- Mohamed Ali Yahya mareiDeep Cut85points
- Mohamed AmeenDeep Cut85points
- Mohamed AmrharDeep Cut85points
- Mohamed AounDeep Cut85points
- Mohamed ArkabDeep Cut85points
- Mohamed AujjarDeep Cut85points
- Mohamed Ayyash QahimDeep Cut85points
- Mohamed BarnichiDeep Cut85points
- Mohamed BelhassanDeep Cut85points
- Mohamed Ben AyedDeep Cut85points
- Mohamed BouchnifDeep Cut85points
- Mohamed BoudessDeep Cut85points
- Mohamed BouhdoudDeep Cut85points
- Mohamed BouslimaniDeep Cut85points
- Mohamed Cheikh BiadillahDeep Cut85points
- Mohamed ChuteDeep Cut85points
- Mohamed DaboDeep Cut85points
- Mohamed Dini FarahDeep Cut85points
- Mohamed DjaanfariDeep Cut85points
- Mohamed DjemaiDeep Cut85points
- Mohamed El AtmaniDeep Cut85points
- Mohamed El BakaouiDeep Cut85points
- Mohamed El HafedDeep Cut85points
- Mohamed El HafyaniDeep Cut85points
- Mohamed El HidaouiDeep Cut85points
- Mohamed El-HejiraDeep Cut85points
- Mohamed El-SawyDeep Cut85points
- Mohamed Elarbi AhninDeep Cut85points
- Mohamed ElhamoutiDeep Cut85points
- Mohamed EzzahraouiDeep Cut85points
- Mohamed FadiliDeep Cut85points
- Mohamed Fahmy HassanDeep Cut85points
- Mohamed Faki MwinyihajiDeep Cut85points
- Mohamed Farah NurDeep Cut85points
- Mohamed FaridDeep Cut85points
- Mohamed Ghassan MaumoonDeep Cut85points
- Mohamed GhayateDeep Cut85points
- Mohamed Habib Juma MnyaaDeep Cut85points
- Mohamed Hadi Al HussainiDeep Cut85points
- Mohamed Hamisi MissangaDeep Cut85points
- Mohamed Hassan Abboud Al-amoudiDeep Cut85points
- Mohamed Hassan AbdiDeep Cut85points
- Mohamed Hassan Al SuwaidiDeep Cut85points
- Mohamed Hassan Al-MadaniDeep Cut85points
- Mohamed Hassan al-Ta'ayshiDeep Cut85points
- Mohamed HattabDeep Cut85points
- Mohamed Hayir MaareeyeDeep Cut85points
- Mohamed IbrahimDeep Cut85points
- Mohamed Id AomarDeep Cut85points
- Mohamed IdmoussaDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
Scoring here is driven by rarity rather than prominence. The single hundred-point answer, Michael Dobbs, sits alone at the top precisely because almost nobody else named that individual, while the enormous 85-point band contains tens of thousands of sitting members drawn from national chambers across every continent, from A B M Mosharrof Hossain and A. A. Rahim to Aaron Bean and Abdoulaye Diop. Those answers were correct, current and specific enough to satisfy the checker, yet common enough among players that they landed in the second tier. Below them, the 60-point group of 328 answers was presumably made up of figures who were either extremely well known, slightly stale in office, or generically described in a way that reduced their value. The lesson is blunt: a verifiable backbencher from a legislature nobody discusses is worth more than a prime minister everyone recognises, and a precise full name outperforms a vague one.