Recorded answers
36,048 recorded answers
How to approach it
The trick is to treat the prompt as a wide funnel rather than a popularity contest. Begin with the people you know best, then deliberately travel to countries whose politics rarely make headlines and reconstruct a name from a roster you remember. National legislatures publish member lists, so recall a chamber you have read about — a small assembly, a federal upper house, a coalition partner's bench — and pick a single sitting member. Verify mentally that the person holds office now, not a decade ago. Then consider the scoring logic: the puzzle rewards answers that many people can confirm but few will think of, so an accurate, verifiable name from an overlooked country beats a famous one almost every time.
Get a hint
Start at the very top of the executive ladder: heads of government, their deputies and the senior ministers who were in office this week.
A little more
Narrow by chamber instead: a single seat in a national legislature is enough, so think of backbenchers, whips and committee chairs as well as speakers.
One step further
Go for depth over fame: a member of a small national assembly or a junior minister in a country that rarely makes the news usually scores higher than a household-name premier.
Reveal answers 36,048
- Mu'taz Al-HaroutDeep Cut85points
- Muammar al-IryaniDeep Cut85points
- Muana Brima MassaquoiDeep Cut85points
- Mubangizi DedanDeep Cut85points
- Mubarak Deng Tong DuangDeep Cut85points
- Mubarak Mohammed MuntakaDeep Cut85points
- Mubarak ZebDeep Cut85points
- Mubarek Elias MustefaDeep Cut85points
- Muborak AhmedovaDeep Cut85points
- Mudassar KapurDeep Cut85points
- Mudiobole Abedi NasserDeep Cut85points
- Mudukoi Fred OduchuDeep Cut85points
- Muferihat Kamil AhmedDeep Cut85points
- Mugabe RobertDeep Cut85points
- Mugabi Muzaale Martin KisuleDeep Cut85points
- Mugambi Ridikiri MurwithaniaDeep Cut85points
- Mugasa Grace MaryDeep Cut85points
- Mugenyi JosephDeep Cut85points
- Mugira JamesDeep Cut85points
- Mugisa Margaret MuhangaDeep Cut85points
- Mugur IsarescuDeep Cut85points
- Mugur MihăescuDeep Cut85points
- Muguwa DiluDeep Cut85points
- Muhadjir EffendyDeep Cut85points
- Muhaimin IskandarDeep Cut85points
- Muhamad Norazlan ArisDeep Cut85points
- Muhamet KadriovDeep Cut85points
- Muhammad Abdallah al-SabahDeep Cut85points
- Muhammad Abdallah Idris MuhammadDeep Cut85points
- Muhammad Abdul Ghaffar WattoDeep Cut85points
- Muhammad Abdul KhaleqDeep Cut85points
- Muhammad Abdul-Ghani Al-AwiwiDeep Cut85points
- Muhammad Abu al-RubDeep Cut85points
- Muhammad Abu ElhegaDeep Cut85points
- Muhammad Affash al-AdwanDeep Cut85points
- Muhammad AfzalDeep Cut85points
- Muhammad Ahmad Muhammad AounDeep Cut85points
- Muhammad Al MalkawiDeep Cut85points
- Muhammad Al RaqqadDeep Cut85points
- Muhammad Al ShawabkehDeep Cut85points
- Muhammad al-AsiDeep Cut85points
- Muhammad al-BakirDeep Cut85points
- Muhammad al-DabibDeep Cut85points
- Muhammad al-DarrajiDeep Cut85points
- Muhammad al-GhujDeep Cut85points
- Muhammad al-KarbuliDeep Cut85points
- Muhammad al-MahaliDeep Cut85points
- Muhammad al-MusawiDeep Cut85points
- Muhammad al-QaryuDeep Cut85points
- Muhammad al-RabatDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
Scoring here is driven by rarity rather than prominence. The single hundred-point answer, Michael Dobbs, sits alone at the top precisely because almost nobody else named that individual, while the enormous 85-point band contains tens of thousands of sitting members drawn from national chambers across every continent, from A B M Mosharrof Hossain and A. A. Rahim to Aaron Bean and Abdoulaye Diop. Those answers were correct, current and specific enough to satisfy the checker, yet common enough among players that they landed in the second tier. Below them, the 60-point group of 328 answers was presumably made up of figures who were either extremely well known, slightly stale in office, or generically described in a way that reduced their value. The lesson is blunt: a verifiable backbencher from a legislature nobody discusses is worth more than a prime minister everyone recognises, and a precise full name outperforms a vague one.