Krillion Recorded answers
36,048 recorded answers
How to approach it
The trick is to treat the prompt as a wide funnel rather than a popularity contest. Begin with the people you know best, then deliberately travel to countries whose politics rarely make headlines and reconstruct a name from a roster you remember. National legislatures publish member lists, so recall a chamber you have read about — a small assembly, a federal upper house, a coalition partner's bench — and pick a single sitting member. Verify mentally that the person holds office now, not a decade ago. Then consider the scoring logic: the puzzle rewards answers that many people can confirm but few will think of, so an accurate, verifiable name from an overlooked country beats a famous one almost every time.
Get a hint
Start at the very top of the executive ladder: heads of government, their deputies and the senior ministers who were in office this week.
A little more
Narrow by chamber instead: a single seat in a national legislature is enough, so think of backbenchers, whips and committee chairs as well as speakers.
One step further
Go for depth over fame: a member of a small national assembly or a junior minister in a country that rarely makes the news usually scores higher than a household-name premier.
Reveal answers 36,048
- Nanthachat SupamongkhonDeep Cut85points
- Nanthana SongprachaDeep Cut85points
- Nanthawan WichianDeep Cut85points
- Nantongo Fortunate RoseDeep Cut85points
- Nany Ould ChroughaDeep Cut85points
- Nanzadyn NaranbaatarDeep Cut85points
- Nanzala MetrineDeep Cut85points
- Naoise Ó CearúilDeep Cut85points
- Naoise Ó MuiríDeep Cut85points
- Naoki FurukawaDeep Cut85points
- Naoki HaradaDeep Cut85points
- Naoki HyakutaDeep Cut85points
- Naoki InoseDeep Cut85points
- Naoki ItoDeep Cut85points
- Naoki OkadaDeep Cut85points
- Naome KibaajuDeep Cut85points
- Naomi CachiaDeep Cut85points
- Naomi LongDeep Cut85points
- Naomi TokashikiDeep Cut85points
- Naomi WaqoDeep Cut85points
- Naomi Yusto PurangiDeep Cut85points
- Naomy Duncan MwaipopoDeep Cut85points
- Naor ShiriDeep Cut85points
- Naotoshi NishiyamaDeep Cut85points
- Napat JittapinankantaDeep Cut85points
- Naphop LaiwisetkulDeep Cut85points
- Napinthorn SrisanpangDeep Cut85points
- Napoleon AbdulaiDeep Cut85points
- Nar Bahadur BistaDeep Cut85points
- Narain Dass GuptaDeep Cut85points
- Narantsetsegiin AltanshagaiDeep Cut85points
- Narasate SirirojanakulDeep Cut85points
- Naraset PratchayakornDeep Cut85points
- Narayan Datta BhattaDeep Cut85points
- Narayan Prasad DahalDeep Cut85points
- Narayan RaneDeep Cut85points
- Narayana Datta MishraDeep Cut85points
- Narayanasa K. BhandageDeep Cut85points
- Narayandas AhirwarDeep Cut85points
- Narcis MircescuDeep Cut85points
- Narciso Damásio dos Santos BeneditoDeep Cut85points
- Narcisse Mouelle KombiDeep Cut85points
- Narek BabayanDeep Cut85points
- Narek GhahramanyanDeep Cut85points
- Narek GrigoryanDeep Cut85points
- Narek MkrtchyanDeep Cut85points
- Narek ZeynalyanDeep Cut85points
- Narend SinghDeep Cut85points
- Narendra Kumar GuptaDeep Cut85points
- Narendra Kumar KerungDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
Scoring here is driven by rarity rather than prominence. The single hundred-point answer, Michael Dobbs, sits alone at the top precisely because almost nobody else named that individual, while the enormous 85-point band contains tens of thousands of sitting members drawn from national chambers across every continent, from A B M Mosharrof Hossain and A. A. Rahim to Aaron Bean and Abdoulaye Diop. Those answers were correct, current and specific enough to satisfy the checker, yet common enough among players that they landed in the second tier. Below them, the 60-point group of 328 answers was presumably made up of figures who were either extremely well known, slightly stale in office, or generically described in a way that reduced their value. The lesson is blunt: a verifiable backbencher from a legislature nobody discusses is worth more than a prime minister everyone recognises, and a precise full name outperforms a vague one.