Krillion Recorded answers
36,048 recorded answers
How to approach it
The trick is to treat the prompt as a wide funnel rather than a popularity contest. Begin with the people you know best, then deliberately travel to countries whose politics rarely make headlines and reconstruct a name from a roster you remember. National legislatures publish member lists, so recall a chamber you have read about — a small assembly, a federal upper house, a coalition partner's bench — and pick a single sitting member. Verify mentally that the person holds office now, not a decade ago. Then consider the scoring logic: the puzzle rewards answers that many people can confirm but few will think of, so an accurate, verifiable name from an overlooked country beats a famous one almost every time.
Get a hint
Start at the very top of the executive ladder: heads of government, their deputies and the senior ministers who were in office this week.
A little more
Narrow by chamber instead: a single seat in a national legislature is enough, so think of backbenchers, whips and committee chairs as well as speakers.
One step further
Go for depth over fame: a member of a small national assembly or a junior minister in a country that rarely makes the news usually scores higher than a household-name premier.
Reveal answers 36,048
- Ana María Aparicio AlbeloDeep Cut85points
- Ana María Balderas TrejoDeep Cut85points
- Ana María Beltrán VillalvaDeep Cut85points
- Ana Maria Cordeiro AlvesDeep Cut85points
- Ana María Crispin ChoqueDeep Cut85points
- Ana Maria da Silva Sousa e SilvaDeep Cut85points
- Ana María Ferrer GarcíaDeep Cut85points
- Ana María Gazmuri VieiraDeep Cut85points
- Ana María IanniDeep Cut85points
- Ana Maria Quiroga RamirezDeep Cut85points
- Ana María Raffo GuevaraDeep Cut85points
- Ana Maria SanjuanDeep Cut85points
- Ana Maria VesgaDeep Cut85points
- Ana Marina Baró MoréDeep Cut85points
- Ana Martínez ZaragozaDeep Cut85points
- Ana Miriam Ferráez CentenoDeep Cut85points
- Ana Novaković ĐurovićDeep Cut85points
- Ana OglindaDeep Cut85points
- Ana OliveiraDeep Cut85points
- Ana OliveraDeep Cut85points
- Ana Paola Agudelo GarcíaDeep Cut85points
- Ana Paola García SotoDeep Cut85points
- Ana Paredes PrietoDeep Cut85points
- Ana PatiñoDeep Cut85points
- Ana Paula Chantre Luna de CarvalhoDeep Cut85points
- Ana Paula LeãoDeep Cut85points
- Ana Paula LimaDeep Cut85points
- Ana Paula LobatoDeep Cut85points
- Ana Paula MartinsDeep Cut85points
- Ana Paula Sacramento NetoDeep Cut85points
- Ana PimentelDeep Cut85points
- Ana Polak PetričDeep Cut85points
- Ana Redondo GarcíaDeep Cut85points
- Ana Ruth Esquivel MedranoDeep Cut85points
- Ana SilveiraDeep Cut85points
- Ana Teresa Igarza MartínezDeep Cut85points
- Anabah Thomas WinsumDeep Cut85points
- Anabel Acosta IslasDeep Cut85points
- Anabel Díaz HurtadoDeep Cut85points
- Anabel Fernández SagastiDeep Cut85points
- Anabel Pereira FernandezDeep Cut85points
- Anabel Quesada ReyesDeep Cut85points
- Anabel Vizcaíno MuñozDeep Cut85points
- Anabela Caiovo GungaDeep Cut85points
- Anabela Valentina SapalaloDeep Cut85points
- Anabell Ávalos ZempoaltecaDeep Cut85points
- Anabella Maria Giracca MendezDeep Cut85points
- Anaclet FometheDeep Cut85points
- Anahí González HernándezDeep Cut85points
- Anahi Nayely Rocha RodasDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
Scoring here is driven by rarity rather than prominence. The single hundred-point answer, Michael Dobbs, sits alone at the top precisely because almost nobody else named that individual, while the enormous 85-point band contains tens of thousands of sitting members drawn from national chambers across every continent, from A B M Mosharrof Hossain and A. A. Rahim to Aaron Bean and Abdoulaye Diop. Those answers were correct, current and specific enough to satisfy the checker, yet common enough among players that they landed in the second tier. Below them, the 60-point group of 328 answers was presumably made up of figures who were either extremely well known, slightly stale in office, or generically described in a way that reduced their value. The lesson is blunt: a verifiable backbencher from a legislature nobody discusses is worth more than a prime minister everyone recognises, and a precise full name outperforms a vague one.