Krillion Recorded answers
36,048 recorded answers
How to approach it
The trick is to treat the prompt as a wide funnel rather than a popularity contest. Begin with the people you know best, then deliberately travel to countries whose politics rarely make headlines and reconstruct a name from a roster you remember. National legislatures publish member lists, so recall a chamber you have read about — a small assembly, a federal upper house, a coalition partner's bench — and pick a single sitting member. Verify mentally that the person holds office now, not a decade ago. Then consider the scoring logic: the puzzle rewards answers that many people can confirm but few will think of, so an accurate, verifiable name from an overlooked country beats a famous one almost every time.
Get a hint
Start at the very top of the executive ladder: heads of government, their deputies and the senior ministers who were in office this week.
A little more
Narrow by chamber instead: a single seat in a national legislature is enough, so think of backbenchers, whips and committee chairs as well as speakers.
One step further
Go for depth over fame: a member of a small national assembly or a junior minister in a country that rarely makes the news usually scores higher than a household-name premier.
Reveal answers 36,048
- Paola HolguinDeep Cut85points
- Paola Limbania López ZeballosDeep Cut85points
- Paola ManciniDeep Cut85points
- Paola Maria ChiesaDeep Cut85points
- Paola MartínezDeep Cut85points
- Paola Meneses MosqueraDeep Cut85points
- Paola Michael Jaramillo ZuritaDeep Cut85points
- Paola Michell Longoria LópezDeep Cut85points
- Paola Milagros Espinosa SánchezDeep Cut85points
- Paola PosaniDeep Cut85points
- Paola Tenorio AdameDeep Cut85points
- Paolo BarelliDeep Cut85points
- Paolo CianiDeep Cut85points
- Paolo CrescentiniDeep Cut85points
- Paolo DuterteDeep Cut85points
- Paolo Emilio RussoDeep Cut85points
- Paolo FormentiniDeep Cut85points
- Paolo MarcheschiDeep Cut85points
- Paolo OrtegaDeep Cut85points
- Paolo PaminiDeep Cut85points
- Paolo PulcianiDeep Cut85points
- Paolo RuffiniDeep Cut85points
- Paolo TosatoDeep Cut85points
- Paolo TrancassiniDeep Cut85points
- Paolo ZangrilloDeep Cut85points
- Paparu Lillian ObialeDeep Cut85points
- Pär GustafssonDeep Cut85points
- Paradorn PrissananantakulDeep Cut85points
- Paraic BradyDeep Cut85points
- Paramet WitthayaraksanDeep Cut85points
- Parash Mani GelalDeep Cut85points
- Parbati B.K.Deep Cut85points
- Parbhubhai Nagarbhai VasavaDeep Cut85points
- Parimal SuklabaidyaDeep Cut85points
- Parinya WongcherdkhwanDeep Cut85points
- Paris KoukoulopoulosDeep Cut85points
- Paris PapadakisDeep Cut85points
- Parisa LiljestrandDeep Cut85points
- Parit WacharasindhuDeep Cut85points
- Park Beom-kyeDeep Cut85points
- Park Chan-daeDeep Cut85points
- Park Choong-kwonDeep Cut85points
- Park Dae-chulDeep Cut85points
- Park Duk-hyumDeep Cut85points
- Park Eun-jungDeep Cut85points
- Park Hae-cheolDeep Cut85points
- Park Hee-seungDeep Cut85points
- Park Hong-baeDeep Cut85points
- Park Hong-keunDeep Cut85points
- Park Hyeung-sooDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
Scoring here is driven by rarity rather than prominence. The single hundred-point answer, Michael Dobbs, sits alone at the top precisely because almost nobody else named that individual, while the enormous 85-point band contains tens of thousands of sitting members drawn from national chambers across every continent, from A B M Mosharrof Hossain and A. A. Rahim to Aaron Bean and Abdoulaye Diop. Those answers were correct, current and specific enough to satisfy the checker, yet common enough among players that they landed in the second tier. Below them, the 60-point group of 328 answers was presumably made up of figures who were either extremely well known, slightly stale in office, or generically described in a way that reduced their value. The lesson is blunt: a verifiable backbencher from a legislature nobody discusses is worth more than a prime minister everyone recognises, and a precise full name outperforms a vague one.