Krillion Recorded answers
36,048 recorded answers
How to approach it
The trick is to treat the prompt as a wide funnel rather than a popularity contest. Begin with the people you know best, then deliberately travel to countries whose politics rarely make headlines and reconstruct a name from a roster you remember. National legislatures publish member lists, so recall a chamber you have read about — a small assembly, a federal upper house, a coalition partner's bench — and pick a single sitting member. Verify mentally that the person holds office now, not a decade ago. Then consider the scoring logic: the puzzle rewards answers that many people can confirm but few will think of, so an accurate, verifiable name from an overlooked country beats a famous one almost every time.
Get a hint
Start at the very top of the executive ladder: heads of government, their deputies and the senior ministers who were in office this week.
A little more
Narrow by chamber instead: a single seat in a national legislature is enough, so think of backbenchers, whips and committee chairs as well as speakers.
One step further
Go for depth over fame: a member of a small national assembly or a junior minister in a country that rarely makes the news usually scores higher than a household-name premier.
Reveal answers 36,048
- Patricia AppiagyeiDeep Cut85points
- Patricia Blanquer AlcarazDeep Cut85points
- Patricia BullrichDeep Cut85points
- Patrícia CarvalhoDeep Cut85points
- Patricia de LilleDeep Cut85points
- Patricia DeveauxDeep Cut85points
- Patrícia FaroDeep Cut85points
- Patricia FergusonDeep Cut85points
- Patricia FigueroaDeep Cut85points
- Patricia Flores ElizondoDeep Cut85points
- Patricia Galindo AlarcónDeep Cut85points
- Patricia GibsonDeep Cut85points
- Patrícia GonçalvesDeep Cut85points
- Patricia HolzmanDeep Cut85points
- Patricia IturreguiDeep Cut85points
- Patricia JuárezDeep Cut85points
- Patricia KramerDeep Cut85points
- Patricia LattanzioDeep Cut85points
- Patricia LemoineDeep Cut85points
- Patricia LipsDeep Cut85points
- Patricia Magin Arancibia IbanezDeep Cut85points
- Patricia MahoneyDeep Cut85points
- Patricia MaussionDeep Cut85points
- Patricia Mercado CastroDeep Cut85points
- Patricia MirallèsDeep Cut85points
- Patricia MorrisDeep Cut85points
- Patrícia NascimentoDeep Cut85points
- Patricia OrantesDeep Cut85points
- Patricia Otero RodríguezDeep Cut85points
- Patricia Ramírez BazánDeep Cut85points
- Patricia RawlingsDeep Cut85points
- Patricia Rodríguez CallejaDeep Cut85points
- Patricia ScotlandDeep Cut85points
- Patricia StephensonDeep Cut85points
- Patricia VásquezDeep Cut85points
- Patricia von FalkensteinDeep Cut85points
- Patricia WiskiesDeep Cut85points
- Patricia ZenaDeep Cut85points
- Patricie UwaseDeep Cut85points
- Patricio Alberto Chávez ZavalaDeep Cut85points
- Patricio Bakale MbaDeep Cut85points
- Patricio Briones MollerDeep Cut85points
- Patricio Pinilla ValenciaDeep Cut85points
- Patriciu Achimaș-CadariuDeep Cut85points
- Patrick AllenDeep Cut85points
- Patrick AndrewsDeep Cut85points
- Patrick AtkinsonDeep Cut85points
- Patrick BasaDeep Cut85points
- Patrick Boakye-YiadomDeep Cut85points
- Patrick BoninDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
Scoring here is driven by rarity rather than prominence. The single hundred-point answer, Michael Dobbs, sits alone at the top precisely because almost nobody else named that individual, while the enormous 85-point band contains tens of thousands of sitting members drawn from national chambers across every continent, from A B M Mosharrof Hossain and A. A. Rahim to Aaron Bean and Abdoulaye Diop. Those answers were correct, current and specific enough to satisfy the checker, yet common enough among players that they landed in the second tier. Below them, the 60-point group of 328 answers was presumably made up of figures who were either extremely well known, slightly stale in office, or generically described in a way that reduced their value. The lesson is blunt: a verifiable backbencher from a legislature nobody discusses is worth more than a prime minister everyone recognises, and a precise full name outperforms a vague one.