Krillion Recorded answers
36,048 recorded answers
How to approach it
The trick is to treat the prompt as a wide funnel rather than a popularity contest. Begin with the people you know best, then deliberately travel to countries whose politics rarely make headlines and reconstruct a name from a roster you remember. National legislatures publish member lists, so recall a chamber you have read about — a small assembly, a federal upper house, a coalition partner's bench — and pick a single sitting member. Verify mentally that the person holds office now, not a decade ago. Then consider the scoring logic: the puzzle rewards answers that many people can confirm but few will think of, so an accurate, verifiable name from an overlooked country beats a famous one almost every time.
Get a hint
Start at the very top of the executive ladder: heads of government, their deputies and the senior ministers who were in office this week.
A little more
Narrow by chamber instead: a single seat in a national legislature is enough, so think of backbenchers, whips and committee chairs as well as speakers.
One step further
Go for depth over fame: a member of a small national assembly or a junior minister in a country that rarely makes the news usually scores higher than a household-name premier.
Reveal answers 36,048
- Paweł BejdaDeep Cut85points
- Paweł BliźniukDeep Cut85points
- Paweł CzerwińskiDeep Cut85points
- Paweł GrzesiowskiDeep Cut85points
- Paweł HreniakDeep Cut85points
- Paweł JabłońskiDeep Cut85points
- Paweł KowalDeep Cut85points
- Paweł KukizDeep Cut85points
- Paweł MasełkoDeep Cut85points
- Paweł OlszewskiDeep Cut85points
- Paweł PapkeDeep Cut85points
- Paweł PietrzykDeep Cut85points
- Paweł RadomskiDeep Cut85points
- Paweł RychlikDeep Cut85points
- Paweł SałekDeep Cut85points
- Paweł ŚlizDeep Cut85points
- Paweł SuskiDeep Cut85points
- Paweł SzefernakerDeep Cut85points
- Paweł SzrotDeep Cut85points
- Paweł ZalewskiDeep Cut85points
- Paweł ZgórzyńskiDeep Cut85points
- Pawitra ChittakitDeep Cut85points
- Paz Charpentier RajcevichDeep Cut85points
- Peace KusasiraDeep Cut85points
- Peace MabeDeep Cut85points
- Peace MutuuzoDeep Cut85points
- Peace TibyazeDeep Cut85points
- Peadar TóibínDeep Cut85points
- Pearnel CharlesDeep Cut85points
- Pearse DohertyDeep Cut85points
- Pech Nyawella BolDeep Cut85points
- Peđa GrbinDeep Cut85points
- Peder HvelplundDeep Cut85points
- Pedrica Saint-JeanDeep Cut85points
- Pedro Agostinho de NeriDeep Cut85points
- Pedro AiharaDeep Cut85points
- Pedro Alejandro Murcia LampreaDeep Cut85points
- Pedro AllianaDeep Cut85points
- Pedro AlvesDeep Cut85points
- Pedro Antonio Paternina GulfoDeep Cut85points
- Pedro Antonio Tineo NúñezDeep Cut85points
- Pedro ArayaDeep Cut85points
- Pedro BordaberryDeep Cut85points
- Pedro CamposDeep Cut85points
- Pedro CoelhoDeep Cut85points
- Pedro CoimbraDeep Cut85points
- Pedro CorreiaDeep Cut85points
- Pedro de Morais NetoDeep Cut85points
- Pedro Díaz VerónDeep Cut85points
- Pedro do CarmoDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
Scoring here is driven by rarity rather than prominence. The single hundred-point answer, Michael Dobbs, sits alone at the top precisely because almost nobody else named that individual, while the enormous 85-point band contains tens of thousands of sitting members drawn from national chambers across every continent, from A B M Mosharrof Hossain and A. A. Rahim to Aaron Bean and Abdoulaye Diop. Those answers were correct, current and specific enough to satisfy the checker, yet common enough among players that they landed in the second tier. Below them, the 60-point group of 328 answers was presumably made up of figures who were either extremely well known, slightly stale in office, or generically described in a way that reduced their value. The lesson is blunt: a verifiable backbencher from a legislature nobody discusses is worth more than a prime minister everyone recognises, and a precise full name outperforms a vague one.