Krillion Recorded answers
36,048 recorded answers
How to approach it
The trick is to treat the prompt as a wide funnel rather than a popularity contest. Begin with the people you know best, then deliberately travel to countries whose politics rarely make headlines and reconstruct a name from a roster you remember. National legislatures publish member lists, so recall a chamber you have read about — a small assembly, a federal upper house, a coalition partner's bench — and pick a single sitting member. Verify mentally that the person holds office now, not a decade ago. Then consider the scoring logic: the puzzle rewards answers that many people can confirm but few will think of, so an accurate, verifiable name from an overlooked country beats a famous one almost every time.
Get a hint
Start at the very top of the executive ladder: heads of government, their deputies and the senior ministers who were in office this week.
A little more
Narrow by chamber instead: a single seat in a national legislature is enough, so think of backbenchers, whips and committee chairs as well as speakers.
One step further
Go for depth over fame: a member of a small national assembly or a junior minister in a country that rarely makes the news usually scores higher than a household-name premier.
Reveal answers 36,048
- Pierre MabialaDeep Cut85points
- Pierre MarleDeep Cut85points
- Pierre MédevielleDeep Cut85points
- Pierre MeurinDeep Cut85points
- Pierre MoreauDeep Cut85points
- Pierre ObaDeep Cut85points
- Pierre OuzouliasDeep Cut85points
- Pierre Paul-HusDeep Cut85points
- Pierre PribetichDeep Cut85points
- Pierre SomseDeep Cut85points
- Pierre WunschDeep Cut85points
- Pierre-Alain RoironDeep Cut85points
- Pierre-André ChiapporiDeep Cut85points
- Pierre-André PageDeep Cut85points
- Pierre-Antoine LeviDeep Cut85points
- Pierre-Christian SoccojaDeep Cut85points
- Pierre-Emmanuel De BauwDeep Cut85points
- Pierre-Henri CarbonnelDeep Cut85points
- Pierre-Yves CadalenDeep Cut85points
- Pierre-Yves DermagneDeep Cut85points
- Pierre-Yves MaillardDeep Cut85points
- Pierrette HayatouDeep Cut85points
- Pierrette RinguetteDeep Cut85points
- Pierrick CourbonDeep Cut85points
- Pieter GrinwisDeep Cut85points
- Pieter GroenewaldDeep Cut85points
- Pieter HeermaDeep Cut85points
- Pietro CannellaDeep Cut85points
- Pietro LoreficeDeep Cut85points
- Pietro ParolinDeep Cut85points
- Pietro PattonDeep Cut85points
- Pietro PittalisDeep Cut85points
- Pieyre-Alexandre AngladeDeep Cut85points
- Pihla Keto-HuovinenDeep Cut85points
- Pila Kole NiningiDeep Cut85points
- Pilar María Terrén LalanaDeep Cut85points
- Pilar Milagros Rojo NogueraDeep Cut85points
- Pilar SulcaDeep Cut85points
- Pim van BallekomDeep Cut85points
- Pim WalenkampDeep Cut85points
- Pimkarn KiratiwirapakornDeep Cut85points
- Pimphattra WichaikulDeep Cut85points
- Pingdwende Gilbert OuedraogoDeep Cut85points
- Pinja PerholehtoDeep Cut85points
- Pinky KekanaDeep Cut85points
- Pinky MngadiDeep Cut85points
- Pinpin UyDeep Cut85points
- Pinsak SursawadiDeep Cut85points
- Pío García-EscuderoDeep Cut85points
- Pio TikoduaduaDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
Scoring here is driven by rarity rather than prominence. The single hundred-point answer, Michael Dobbs, sits alone at the top precisely because almost nobody else named that individual, while the enormous 85-point band contains tens of thousands of sitting members drawn from national chambers across every continent, from A B M Mosharrof Hossain and A. A. Rahim to Aaron Bean and Abdoulaye Diop. Those answers were correct, current and specific enough to satisfy the checker, yet common enough among players that they landed in the second tier. Below them, the 60-point group of 328 answers was presumably made up of figures who were either extremely well known, slightly stale in office, or generically described in a way that reduced their value. The lesson is blunt: a verifiable backbencher from a legislature nobody discusses is worth more than a prime minister everyone recognises, and a precise full name outperforms a vague one.