Krillion Recorded answers
36,048 recorded answers
How to approach it
The trick is to treat the prompt as a wide funnel rather than a popularity contest. Begin with the people you know best, then deliberately travel to countries whose politics rarely make headlines and reconstruct a name from a roster you remember. National legislatures publish member lists, so recall a chamber you have read about — a small assembly, a federal upper house, a coalition partner's bench — and pick a single sitting member. Verify mentally that the person holds office now, not a decade ago. Then consider the scoring logic: the puzzle rewards answers that many people can confirm but few will think of, so an accurate, verifiable name from an overlooked country beats a famous one almost every time.
Get a hint
Start at the very top of the executive ladder: heads of government, their deputies and the senior ministers who were in office this week.
A little more
Narrow by chamber instead: a single seat in a national legislature is enough, so think of backbenchers, whips and committee chairs as well as speakers.
One step further
Go for depth over fame: a member of a small national assembly or a junior minister in a country that rarely makes the news usually scores higher than a household-name premier.
Reveal answers 36,048
- Rodger CuznerDeep Cut85points
- Rodica ConstantinescuDeep Cut85points
- Rodica CușnirDeep Cut85points
- Rodica NassarDeep Cut85points
- Rodil V. ZalamedaDeep Cut85points
- Rodiyah SapieeDeep Cut85points
- Rodmal NagarDeep Cut85points
- Rodney CloeteDeep Cut85points
- Rodney Ebikebina AmbaioweiDeep Cut85points
- Rodney OuelletteDeep Cut85points
- Rodney René Socarrás BuenoDeep Cut85points
- Rodney ScottDeep Cut85points
- Rodney SikumbaDeep Cut85points
- Rodney WilliamsDeep Cut85points
- Rodolfo Alejandro SuárezDeep Cut85points
- Rodolfo Antonio Crespo GrismaldoDeep Cut85points
- Rodolfo Antonio Delgado MontesDeep Cut85points
- Rodolfo CarterDeep Cut85points
- Rodolfo Eduardo SanzDeep Cut85points
- Rodolfo Emilio Domínguez RozabalDeep Cut85points
- Rodolfo Garcia EncinasDeep Cut85points
- Rodolfo Marco TorresDeep Cut85points
- Rodolfo NogueiraDeep Cut85points
- Rodolfo Pereyra MartínezDeep Cut85points
- Rodolfo TailhadeDeep Cut85points
- Rodolphe AdadaDeep Cut85points
- Rodolphe AlexandreDeep Cut85points
- Rodolphe HaykalDeep Cut85points
- Rodolphe Heritier Bonheur Doneng-WanzoumonDeep Cut85points
- Rodrick LikandoDeep Cut85points
- Rodrigo Alves TaxaDeep Cut85points
- Rodrigo Antonio LomaDeep Cut85points
- Rodrigo ArenasDeep Cut85points
- Rodrigo BlancoDeep Cut85points
- Rodrigo BlásDeep Cut85points
- Rodrigo ChavesDeep Cut85points
- Rodrigo Condori MamaniDeep Cut85points
- Rodrigo da ZaeliDeep Cut85points
- Rodrigo Daniel GamarraDeep Cut85points
- Rodrigo de CastroDeep Cut85points
- Rodrigo GambaleDeep Cut85points
- Rodrigo GoñiDeep Cut85points
- Rodrigo Lara RestrepoDeep Cut85points
- Rodrigo Nicora VillamayorDeep Cut85points
- Rodrigo PazDeep Cut85points
- Rodrigo Pellecer RodríguezDeep Cut85points
- Rodrigo Ramírez ParraDeep Cut85points
- Rodrigo RollembergDeep Cut85points
- Rodrigo SaraivaDeep Cut85points
- Rodrigo ValadaresDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
Scoring here is driven by rarity rather than prominence. The single hundred-point answer, Michael Dobbs, sits alone at the top precisely because almost nobody else named that individual, while the enormous 85-point band contains tens of thousands of sitting members drawn from national chambers across every continent, from A B M Mosharrof Hossain and A. A. Rahim to Aaron Bean and Abdoulaye Diop. Those answers were correct, current and specific enough to satisfy the checker, yet common enough among players that they landed in the second tier. Below them, the 60-point group of 328 answers was presumably made up of figures who were either extremely well known, slightly stale in office, or generically described in a way that reduced their value. The lesson is blunt: a verifiable backbencher from a legislature nobody discusses is worth more than a prime minister everyone recognises, and a precise full name outperforms a vague one.