Krillion Recorded answers
36,048 recorded answers
How to approach it
The trick is to treat the prompt as a wide funnel rather than a popularity contest. Begin with the people you know best, then deliberately travel to countries whose politics rarely make headlines and reconstruct a name from a roster you remember. National legislatures publish member lists, so recall a chamber you have read about — a small assembly, a federal upper house, a coalition partner's bench — and pick a single sitting member. Verify mentally that the person holds office now, not a decade ago. Then consider the scoring logic: the puzzle rewards answers that many people can confirm but few will think of, so an accurate, verifiable name from an overlooked country beats a famous one almost every time.
Get a hint
Start at the very top of the executive ladder: heads of government, their deputies and the senior ministers who were in office this week.
A little more
Narrow by chamber instead: a single seat in a national legislature is enough, so think of backbenchers, whips and committee chairs as well as speakers.
One step further
Go for depth over fame: a member of a small national assembly or a junior minister in a country that rarely makes the news usually scores higher than a household-name premier.
Reveal answers 36,048
- Sandra MarsaudDeep Cut85points
- Sandra Milian GómezDeep Cut85points
- Sandra NedovDeep Cut85points
- Sandra Orellana CruzDeep Cut85points
- Sandra Palmen-SchlangenDeep Cut85points
- Sandra Patricia Palacios MedinaDeep Cut85points
- Sandra PaulemonDeep Cut85points
- Sandra PereiraDeep Cut85points
- Sandra PettovelloDeep Cut85points
- Sandra PupatelloDeep Cut85points
- Sandra RegolDeep Cut85points
- Sandra Reina Vilacahua RomanoDeep Cut85points
- Sandra RibeiroDeep Cut85points
- Sandra Santamaría VázquezDeep Cut85points
- Sandra SavinoDeep Cut85points
- Sandra SigurðardóttirDeep Cut85points
- Sandra SollbergerDeep Cut85points
- Sandra SönnergrenDeep Cut85points
- Sandra StacchiniDeep Cut85points
- Sandra SteinDeep Cut85points
- Sandra Teresa Numanawa Kakunda HenriquesDeep Cut85points
- Sandra Virginia Surco AruquipaDeep Cut85points
- Sandra Yanira CalderónDeep Cut85points
- Sandra ZampaDeep Cut85points
- Sandrine Dogor-SuchDeep Cut85points
- Sandrine JossoDeep Cut85points
- Sandrine LalanneDeep Cut85points
- Sandrine Le FeurDeep Cut85points
- Sandrine NosbéDeep Cut85points
- Sandrine RousseauDeep Cut85points
- Sandrine RunelDeep Cut85points
- Sandrine UmutoniDeep Cut85points
- Sandro AlexDeep Cut85points
- Sandro BeerDeep Cut85points
- Sandro Di NunzioDeep Cut85points
- Sandro MarcosDeep Cut85points
- Sandro Renato Agostinho de OliveiraDeep Cut85points
- Sandro SislerDeep Cut85points
- Sandy Ghobrial KastourDeep Cut85points
- Sanela ShkrijelDeep Cut85points
- Sanele MwaliDeep Cut85points
- Sanele ZondoDeep Cut85points
- Sanet SteenkampDeep Cut85points
- Sanford BishopDeep Cut85points
- Sang-Hoon AhnDeep Cut85points
- Sanga SongmahachaiDeep Cut85points
- Sangadji TarbaevDeep Cut85points
- Sangay DorjiDeep Cut85points
- Sangay KhanduDeep Cut85points
- Sangay ThinleyDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
Scoring here is driven by rarity rather than prominence. The single hundred-point answer, Michael Dobbs, sits alone at the top precisely because almost nobody else named that individual, while the enormous 85-point band contains tens of thousands of sitting members drawn from national chambers across every continent, from A B M Mosharrof Hossain and A. A. Rahim to Aaron Bean and Abdoulaye Diop. Those answers were correct, current and specific enough to satisfy the checker, yet common enough among players that they landed in the second tier. Below them, the 60-point group of 328 answers was presumably made up of figures who were either extremely well known, slightly stale in office, or generically described in a way that reduced their value. The lesson is blunt: a verifiable backbencher from a legislature nobody discusses is worth more than a prime minister everyone recognises, and a precise full name outperforms a vague one.