Krillion Recorded answers
36,048 recorded answers
How to approach it
The trick is to treat the prompt as a wide funnel rather than a popularity contest. Begin with the people you know best, then deliberately travel to countries whose politics rarely make headlines and reconstruct a name from a roster you remember. National legislatures publish member lists, so recall a chamber you have read about — a small assembly, a federal upper house, a coalition partner's bench — and pick a single sitting member. Verify mentally that the person holds office now, not a decade ago. Then consider the scoring logic: the puzzle rewards answers that many people can confirm but few will think of, so an accurate, verifiable name from an overlooked country beats a famous one almost every time.
Get a hint
Start at the very top of the executive ladder: heads of government, their deputies and the senior ministers who were in office this week.
A little more
Narrow by chamber instead: a single seat in a national legislature is enough, so think of backbenchers, whips and committee chairs as well as speakers.
One step further
Go for depth over fame: a member of a small national assembly or a junior minister in a country that rarely makes the news usually scores higher than a household-name premier.
Reveal answers 36,048
- Seripisut TemiyavetDeep Cut85points
- Serkan RamanlıDeep Cut85points
- Serkan SarıDeep Cut85points
- Servet MullaoğluDeep Cut85points
- Sesoo IkpacherDeep Cut85points
- Seth MagazinerDeep Cut85points
- Seth Osei-AkotoDeep Cut85points
- Sethaput SuthiwartnarueputDeep Cut85points
- Setsuko KawaharaDeep Cut85points
- Setthakiat KrachangwongDeep Cut85points
- Seuamuli Fasi TomaDeep Cut85points
- Seule SimeonDeep Cut85points
- Sevda Erdan KılıçDeep Cut85points
- Sevda Karaca DemirDeep Cut85points
- Seve PaeniuDeep Cut85points
- Seve Te'i FuimaonoDeep Cut85points
- Sevenitini Toumo'uaDeep Cut85points
- Severiano Ángel Cuesta AlonsoDeep Cut85points
- Severin BrünggerDeep Cut85points
- Sevi AmanatidouDeep Cut85points
- Sevi VoloudakiDeep Cut85points
- Sevil MikayılovaDeep Cut85points
- Sevilay Çelenk ÖzenDeep Cut85points
- Sevim AliDeep Cut85points
- Sevinc FətəliyevaDeep Cut85points
- Sevinc HüseynovaDeep Cut85points
- Sevlid HurticDeep Cut85points
- Sewasewi Tizazu AbateDeep Cut85points
- Seydi GülsoyDeep Cut85points
- Seydou AsmanDeep Cut85points
- Seyed Abolhasan HasanzadehDeep Cut85points
- Seyed Ali MadanizadehDeep Cut85points
- Seyed Alireza DanaDeep Cut85points
- Seyed Bagher Seyyedi BonabiDeep Cut85points
- Seyed Majid Ghafeleh BashiDeep Cut85points
- Seyed Majid TafreshiDeep Cut85points
- Seyed Mohammad Ali Modaressi TabatabaeiDeep Cut85points
- Seyed Mohammad Ali RobatjaziDeep Cut85points
- Seyed Mohsen TaheriDeep Cut85points
- Seyfedin HarunDeep Cut85points
- Seyfi MehmedaliDeep Cut85points
- Seyid Mohammed HusseinDeep Cut85points
- Seyran OhanyanDeep Cut85points
- Seyyed Ahmad Hosseini KhorasaniDeep Cut85points
- Sezai RokajDeep Cut85points
- Sezai TemelliDeep Cut85points
- Sezgin TanrıkuluDeep Cut85points
- Sədaqət VəliyevaDeep Cut85points
- Səttar MehbalıyevDeep Cut85points
- Sh Mohmed Puzi Sh AliDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
Scoring here is driven by rarity rather than prominence. The single hundred-point answer, Michael Dobbs, sits alone at the top precisely because almost nobody else named that individual, while the enormous 85-point band contains tens of thousands of sitting members drawn from national chambers across every continent, from A B M Mosharrof Hossain and A. A. Rahim to Aaron Bean and Abdoulaye Diop. Those answers were correct, current and specific enough to satisfy the checker, yet common enough among players that they landed in the second tier. Below them, the 60-point group of 328 answers was presumably made up of figures who were either extremely well known, slightly stale in office, or generically described in a way that reduced their value. The lesson is blunt: a verifiable backbencher from a legislature nobody discusses is worth more than a prime minister everyone recognises, and a precise full name outperforms a vague one.