Krillion Recorded answers
36,048 recorded answers
How to approach it
The trick is to treat the prompt as a wide funnel rather than a popularity contest. Begin with the people you know best, then deliberately travel to countries whose politics rarely make headlines and reconstruct a name from a roster you remember. National legislatures publish member lists, so recall a chamber you have read about — a small assembly, a federal upper house, a coalition partner's bench — and pick a single sitting member. Verify mentally that the person holds office now, not a decade ago. Then consider the scoring logic: the puzzle rewards answers that many people can confirm but few will think of, so an accurate, verifiable name from an overlooked country beats a famous one almost every time.
Get a hint
Start at the very top of the executive ladder: heads of government, their deputies and the senior ministers who were in office this week.
A little more
Narrow by chamber instead: a single seat in a national legislature is enough, so think of backbenchers, whips and committee chairs as well as speakers.
One step further
Go for depth over fame: a member of a small national assembly or a junior minister in a country that rarely makes the news usually scores higher than a household-name premier.
Reveal answers 36,048
- Supaporn SalabsriDeep Cut85points
- Supasit KocharoenyosDeep Cut85points
- Supat SupachalasaiDeep Cut85points
- Supatra NacapewDeep Cut85points
- Suphachai JaismutDeep Cut85points
- Suphajee SuthampunDeep Cut85points
- Suphanan PanyathipDeep Cut85points
- Suphanat MinchaiynuntDeep Cut85points
- Suphatchai TiaocharoensophaDeep Cut85points
- Suphatra SrimaitreephithakDeep Cut85points
- Supheeraphat PhumiphakDeep Cut85points
- Suphon ChunlasaiDeep Cut85points
- Supra MahumapeloDeep Cut85points
- Supratman Andi AgtasDeep Cut85points
- Supriya SuleDeep Cut85points
- Surachat ChanpraditDeep Cut85points
- Surachet PravinvongvuthDeep Cut85points
- Suranga RathnayakaDeep Cut85points
- Surangel Whipps Jr.Deep Cut85points
- Surapoj TohcharoensukDeep Cut85points
- Surapon WiratyosinDeep Cut85points
- Surapong IntharathawornDeep Cut85points
- Surasak ChingnawanDeep Cut85points
- Surasak PhancharoenworakulDeep Cut85points
- Surasit JiemvijuckDeep Cut85points
- Surasit VongvittayanunDeep Cut85points
- Surathin PhichanDeep Cut85points
- Surayud ChulanontDeep Cut85points
- Suree ThammartDeep Cut85points
- Sureena BrackenridgeDeep Cut85points
- Surendra ChaudharyDeep Cut85points
- Surendra Prasad YadavDeep Cut85points
- Surendra Singh NagarDeep Cut85points
- Sürenjavyn LündegDeep Cut85points
- Suresh GopiDeep Cut85points
- Suresh Kumar AlemagarDeep Cut85points
- Suresh Kumar ChaudharyDeep Cut85points
- Suresh Kumar KashyapDeep Cut85points
- Suresh ShetkarDeep Cut85points
- Suresh SinghDeep Cut85points
- Süreyya Öneş DericiDeep Cut85points
- Surin PalareaDeep Cut85points
- Suriya BarasonDeep Cut85points
- Suriya ChindawongseDeep Cut85points
- Suriya JungrungreangkitDeep Cut85points
- Suriya PansukaDeep Cut85points
- Suriya WongareeDeep Cut85points
- Sururi ÇorabatırDeep Cut85points
- Surya Bahadur TamangDeep Cut85points
- Surya KantDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
Scoring here is driven by rarity rather than prominence. The single hundred-point answer, Michael Dobbs, sits alone at the top precisely because almost nobody else named that individual, while the enormous 85-point band contains tens of thousands of sitting members drawn from national chambers across every continent, from A B M Mosharrof Hossain and A. A. Rahim to Aaron Bean and Abdoulaye Diop. Those answers were correct, current and specific enough to satisfy the checker, yet common enough among players that they landed in the second tier. Below them, the 60-point group of 328 answers was presumably made up of figures who were either extremely well known, slightly stale in office, or generically described in a way that reduced their value. The lesson is blunt: a verifiable backbencher from a legislature nobody discusses is worth more than a prime minister everyone recognises, and a precise full name outperforms a vague one.