Recorded answers
36,048 recorded answers
How to approach it
The trick is to treat the prompt as a wide funnel rather than a popularity contest. Begin with the people you know best, then deliberately travel to countries whose politics rarely make headlines and reconstruct a name from a roster you remember. National legislatures publish member lists, so recall a chamber you have read about — a small assembly, a federal upper house, a coalition partner's bench — and pick a single sitting member. Verify mentally that the person holds office now, not a decade ago. Then consider the scoring logic: the puzzle rewards answers that many people can confirm but few will think of, so an accurate, verifiable name from an overlooked country beats a famous one almost every time.
Get a hint
Start at the very top of the executive ladder: heads of government, their deputies and the senior ministers who were in office this week.
A little more
Narrow by chamber instead: a single seat in a national legislature is enough, so think of backbenchers, whips and committee chairs as well as speakers.
One step further
Go for depth over fame: a member of a small national assembly or a junior minister in a country that rarely makes the news usually scores higher than a household-name premier.
Reveal answers 36,048
- Tharaphong MalakhamDeep Cut85points
- Tharwat el-KherbawyDeep Cut85points
- Thatchayanat ChianthanatkanonDeep Cut85points
- Thatphong SasomsapDeep Cut85points
- Thawat SurabanDeep Cut85points
- Thawisap TatsamaiDeep Cut85points
- Thea Garcia RamirezDeep Cut85points
- Theano FotiouDeep Cut85points
- Theera SutheewarangkunDeep Cut85points
- Theerarat SamrejvanichDeep Cut85points
- Theerasak ChiratrachuDeep Cut85points
- Thelma Elizabeth Ramírez RetanaDeep Cut85points
- Thembeka MchunuDeep Cut85points
- Thembi SimelaneDeep Cut85points
- Thembi SiweyaDeep Cut85points
- Thembinkosi MjaduDeep Cut85points
- Themistoklis DemirisDeep Cut85points
- Theo Albert PelgenDeep Cut85points
- Théo BernhardtDeep Cut85points
- Theo BovensDeep Cut85points
- Theo FranckenDeep Cut85points
- Theo RietkerkDeep Cut85points
- Theodora AkriotouDeep Cut85points
- Theodora TzakriDeep Cut85points
- Theodora-Magdalena MirceaDeep Cut85points
- Theodore AgnewDeep Cut85points
- Théodore DatouoDeep Cut85points
- Théodore Léonard RandriamangaDeep Cut85points
- Theodoros Kalionchiz De la FuenteDeep Cut85points
- Theodoros KaraoglouDeep Cut85points
- Theodoros LivaniosDeep Cut85points
- Theodoros RoussopoulosDeep Cut85points
- Theodoros SkylakakisDeep Cut85points
- Theodoulitsa DrousiotouDeep Cut85points
- Theofilos LeontaridisDeep Cut85points
- Theofilos XanthopoulosDeep Cut85points
- Theoneste Begumisa SafariDeep Cut85points
- Théophile BaoroDeep Cut85points
- Théophiline VelonjaraDeep Cut85points
- Theophilus OchangDeep Cut85points
- Thepparit PaseeDeep Cut85points
- Theresa Berg AndersenDeep Cut85points
- Theresa GriffinDeep Cut85points
- Theresa JeyiDeep Cut85points
- Theresa Lardi AwuniDeep Cut85points
- Thérèse CoffeyDeep Cut85points
- Thérèse Eloumba MedjoDeep Cut85points
- Therese Kayikwamba WagnerDeep Cut85points
- Therese KristianssonDeep Cut85points
- Therese SchläpferDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
Scoring here is driven by rarity rather than prominence. The single hundred-point answer, Michael Dobbs, sits alone at the top precisely because almost nobody else named that individual, while the enormous 85-point band contains tens of thousands of sitting members drawn from national chambers across every continent, from A B M Mosharrof Hossain and A. A. Rahim to Aaron Bean and Abdoulaye Diop. Those answers were correct, current and specific enough to satisfy the checker, yet common enough among players that they landed in the second tier. Below them, the 60-point group of 328 answers was presumably made up of figures who were either extremely well known, slightly stale in office, or generically described in a way that reduced their value. The lesson is blunt: a verifiable backbencher from a legislature nobody discusses is worth more than a prime minister everyone recognises, and a precise full name outperforms a vague one.