Krillion Recorded answers
36,048 recorded answers
How to approach it
The trick is to treat the prompt as a wide funnel rather than a popularity contest. Begin with the people you know best, then deliberately travel to countries whose politics rarely make headlines and reconstruct a name from a roster you remember. National legislatures publish member lists, so recall a chamber you have read about — a small assembly, a federal upper house, a coalition partner's bench — and pick a single sitting member. Verify mentally that the person holds office now, not a decade ago. Then consider the scoring logic: the puzzle rewards answers that many people can confirm but few will think of, so an accurate, verifiable name from an overlooked country beats a famous one almost every time.
Get a hint
Start at the very top of the executive ladder: heads of government, their deputies and the senior ministers who were in office this week.
A little more
Narrow by chamber instead: a single seat in a national legislature is enough, so think of backbenchers, whips and committee chairs as well as speakers.
One step further
Go for depth over fame: a member of a small national assembly or a junior minister in a country that rarely makes the news usually scores higher than a household-name premier.
Reveal answers 36,048
- Antonio BritoDeep Cut85points
- Antonio Carlos RodriguesDeep Cut85points
- António CarneiroDeep Cut85points
- Antonio CasoDeep Cut85points
- Antonio D'alessioDeep Cut85points
- Antonio de Jesús Ramírez RamosDeep Cut85points
- Antonio De PoliDeep Cut85points
- Antonio del Moral GarcíaDeep Cut85points
- Antonio Della RossaDeep Cut85points
- Antônio DoidoDeep Cut85points
- Antonio Domingo Ecarri AngolaDeep Cut85points
- Antonio FerraraDeep Cut85points
- António Francisco de AssisDeep Cut85points
- Antonio GiordanoDeep Cut85points
- Antonio GuidiDeep Cut85points
- Antonio Gutiérrez LimonesDeep Cut85points
- Antonio IannoneDeep Cut85points
- Antonio José Correa JiménezDeep Cut85points
- Antonio José RumbosDeep Cut85points
- António José SeguroDeep Cut85points
- Antonio José Sivira ChirinosDeep Cut85points
- António Kalandula BânduaDeep Cut85points
- Antonio Lagdameo Jr.Deep Cut85points
- Antonio Lagdameo, Sr.Deep Cut85points
- Antonio Leitao AmaroDeep Cut85points
- Antonio Lorenzo Castro VillarrealDeep Cut85points
- Antonio Luengo ZapataDeep Cut85points
- António Luvualu de CarvalhoDeep Cut85points
- Antonio Magdaleno AlegríaDeep Cut85points
- Antonio Manuel Taveras GuzmánDeep Cut85points
- Antonio Maria GabelloneDeep Cut85points
- Antonio Martínez RodríguezDeep Cut85points
- Antonio Mejía HaroDeep Cut85points
- António Mendonça MendesDeep Cut85points
- Antonio MilošoskiDeep Cut85points
- Antonio MisianiDeep Cut85points
- Antonio Muñoz MartínezDeep Cut85points
- Antonio Narváez RodríguezDeep Cut85points
- Antonio NicitaDeep Cut85points
- Antonio Oburo OndoDeep Cut85points
- António Osvaldo SaídeDeep Cut85points
- Antonio PatriotaDeep Cut85points
- Antonio Peral GarcíaDeep Cut85points
- Antonio Poveda ZapataDeep Cut85points
- Antonio RiveraDeep Cut85points
- António RodriguesDeep Cut85points
- António Rodrigues Afonso PauloDeep Cut85points
- Antonio Rodriguez RodriguezDeep Cut85points
- Antonio Román JasanadaDeep Cut85points
- Antonio Salvatore TrevisiDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
Scoring here is driven by rarity rather than prominence. The single hundred-point answer, Michael Dobbs, sits alone at the top precisely because almost nobody else named that individual, while the enormous 85-point band contains tens of thousands of sitting members drawn from national chambers across every continent, from A B M Mosharrof Hossain and A. A. Rahim to Aaron Bean and Abdoulaye Diop. Those answers were correct, current and specific enough to satisfy the checker, yet common enough among players that they landed in the second tier. Below them, the 60-point group of 328 answers was presumably made up of figures who were either extremely well known, slightly stale in office, or generically described in a way that reduced their value. The lesson is blunt: a verifiable backbencher from a legislature nobody discusses is worth more than a prime minister everyone recognises, and a precise full name outperforms a vague one.