Krillion Recorded answers
2,661 recorded answers
How to approach it
Work outward from the most general label you can think of and then subdivide. Once you have a region in mind, ask what lies inside it, what covers it, what passes through it and what marks its edges. Anatomy rewards that habit because almost every large structure has named parts: an edge, a surface, a notch, a branch, a tiny muscle that only some people have. Then filter for the waist rule, since anything belonging to the trunk above the belt is disqualified even if it feels adjacent. Finally, prefer the precise term over the everyday one, because the scoring clearly favours vocabulary you would only meet in a reference text, and commit to a single best guess rather than a vague description.
Get a hint
Start with the geography: everything from the belt down, front and back, is fair game, so the pool is far larger than the handful of words people shout out first.
A little more
Move from the obvious to the technical by asking what an anatomist would label there: skeletal, muscular, ligamentous, vascular, nervous and visceral detail, including the small named patches on each.
One step further
The highest-value entries are the kind of detail only a trained eye would produce, so push past the headline structures into branches, borders, surfaces and variants that get their own entry in a reference work.
Reveal answers 2,661
- Ovarian fossaDeep Cut85points
- Ovarian hilumDeep Cut85points
- Ovarian ligamentDeep Cut85points
- Ovarian plexusDeep Cut85points
- Ovarian stigmaDeep Cut85points
- Ovarian stromaDeep Cut85points
- Ovarian surface epitheliumDeep Cut85points
- Ovarian veinDeep Cut85points
- Pampiniform plexusDeep Cut85points
- ParadidymisDeep Cut85points
- ParametriumDeep Cut85points
- Pararectal fossaDeep Cut85points
- Pararectal lymph nodesDeep Cut85points
- Parauterine lymph nodesDeep Cut85points
- Paravaginal lymph nodesDeep Cut85points
- Paravesical fossaDeep Cut85points
- Paravesical lymph nodesDeep Cut85points
- Parietal layer of tunica vaginalisDeep Cut85points
- Parietal pelvic lymph nodeDeep Cut85points
- ParoophoronDeep Cut85points
- Pars peronea metatarsalis primiDeep Cut85points
- Patellar networkDeep Cut85points
- Patellar plexusDeep Cut85points
- Patellar retinaculumDeep Cut85points
- Patellar surface of femurDeep Cut85points
- Patellofemoral jointDeep Cut85points
- Patellotibial ligamentDeep Cut85points
- Pecten pubisDeep Cut85points
- Pectinate lineDeep Cut85points
- Pectineal ligamentDeep Cut85points
- Pectineal line of femurDeep Cut85points
- PectineusDeep Cut85points
- Pectineus branch of femoral nerveDeep Cut85points
- Pectiniform septum of clitorisDeep Cut85points
- Pedicle of fifth lumbar vertebraDeep Cut85points
- Pedicle of fourth lumbar vertebraDeep Cut85points
- Pelvic arteriesDeep Cut85points
- Pelvic brimDeep Cut85points
- Pelvic fasciaDeep Cut85points
- Pelvic inletDeep Cut85points
- Pelvic lymph nodesDeep Cut85points
- Pelvic nervesDeep Cut85points
- Pelvic organsDeep Cut85points
- Pelvic outletDeep Cut85points
- Pelvic peritoneumDeep Cut85points
- Pelvic sacral foramenDeep Cut85points
- Pelvic splanchnic nervesDeep Cut85points
- Pelvic surface of coccyxDeep Cut85points
- Pelvic surface of sacrumDeep Cut85points
- Pelvic ureterDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
The reveal is effectively a page from an anatomical ontology, and the points track obscurity almost perfectly. One entry sits alone at the top: Fabella (100), a sesamoid bone that develops inside a tendon in only a minority of people, exactly the sort of answer almost nobody produces without having studied the variant. The 85-point band, 2450 answers strong, is where competent deep cuts land: Adductor brevis, Acetabular fossa, Accessory soleus, Abductor hallucis, all real, all specific, none of them the first thing a generalist would say. The 151 answers at 60 points look like the everyday words, the ones a whole room would shout at once, and their low value reflects how little they narrow the field. With 2661 answers recorded and only 2602 clearing 60, the tail below is small, so almost every serious attempt was rewarded, just not at the same rate. The lesson is not to be clever but to be granular: precision and a tolerance for obscurity paid far better than obviousness.