Krillion Recorded answers
9,056 recorded answers
How to approach it
Work from volume downward. Draw up the formats that reliably gather four-figure review counts: daily news round-ups, long-form conversation shows, true-crime strands, sports chatter, comedy rewatches and fiction anthologies. Then widen the map, because a programme can be enormous in one country and invisible in another, and titles written in scripts you cannot read sit in the same catalogue. With a shortlist in hand, check the review count rather than the episode count, since a prolific feed can still fall under the bar. Keep a running sense of what the crowd will send and deliberately drift toward the margins, where unusual names and small-audience shows remain unclaimed. Originality pays more than prestige here.
Get a hint
Begin with volume: any genre, any country and any language is admissible, provided the show page displays a review count above the threshold.
A little more
Then narrow by format: long-running chat programmes, daily briefings, fiction serials and hobby deep-dives all qualify, so weigh shapes rather than famous faces.
One step further
Finally leave the front page behind and chase titles built from odd punctuation, emoji, symbols or scripts you cannot read, since those are the entries rivals skip.
Reveal answers 9,056
- Emergency IntercomRare60points
- EmpireRare60points
- EntreLeadershipRare60points
- ESPN FCRare60points
- Factually! with Adam ConoverRare60points
- Fake Doctors, Real Friends with Zach and DonaldRare60points
- Fall of Civilizations PodcastRare60points
- Fantasy Focus FootballRare60points
- Fantasy Football TodayRare60points
- Fantasy Footballers - Fantasy Football PodcastRare60points
- FantasyProsRare60points
- Fareed Zakaria GPSRare60points
- Fear&Rare60points
- Figuring Out with Raj ShamaniRare60points
- Film TheoryRare60points
- Fin vs HistoryRare60points
- Financial AuditRare60points
- First TakeRare60points
- First Things FirstRare60points
- FiveThirtyEight PoliticsRare60points
- FlagrantRare60points
- Flightless BirdRare60points
- Flow PodcastRare60points
- Fly on the Wall with Dana Carvey and David SpadeRare60points
- Fore PlayRare60points
- Forehead FablesRare60points
- Forensic FilesRare60points
- FoundersRare60points
- Freakonomics RadioRare60points
- Fresh & FitRare60points
- Fresh AirRare60points
- Fudd Around And Find OutRare60points
- Full Send PodcastRare60points
- Game TheoryRare60points
- Gemischtes HackRare60points
- Generation Why: True CrimeRare60points
- Get Sleepy: stories for sleepRare60points
- Getting Better with Jonathan Van NessRare60points
- Giggly SquadRare60points
- Girl TalkRare60points
- Girls Gone BibleRare60points
- Girls Gotta EatRare60points
- Girls Next LevelRare60points
- Global News PodcastRare60points
- Go! My Favorite Sports TeamRare60points
- Gold Minds with Kevin HartRare60points
- Good For You with Whitney CummingsRare60points
- Good Hang with Amy PoehlerRare60points
- Good Inside with Dr. BeckyRare60points
- GoonsRare60points
Why these answers count
Points tracked rarity rather than fame. Of the 9,007 entries that earned top marks, 8,189 landed on eighty-five points, which shows the field had already slipped away from obvious picks toward small, frequently foreign-language shows: ¡Con amor, carajo!, ¡Menudo Cuadro!, ¿Cómo Están Los Weones?, ¿Qué Haría Jesús? and ¡Qué Spooky! Podcast all settled there. Above them, alone on one hundred, sits Til Death Do Us Blart, a title obscure enough that barely anyone else reached it while still clearing the thousand-rating bar comfortably. The remaining 817 answers took sixty, the band that looks like the widely shared, more familiar choices: valid, above the threshold, yet common enough to be heavily duplicated. The pattern carries the lesson. The rating requirement filters out tiny feeds no matter how obscure they are, and among the survivors the score pays for whatever the crowd overlooked. A rarer title beats a famous one every time, provided the review count genuinely passes.