Krillion Recorded answers
7,946 recorded answers
How to approach it
Work from the outside in. First list the names printed on packaging you have handled: the parent company, the studio, the imprint. Then push past the obvious few into adjacent categories, because the question covers dolls, construction sets, board games, card games, model kits, die-cast vehicles, plush and designer vinyl alike. Each of those worlds has its own publishers and workshops, and most of them are legitimate brand names. Once easy recall runs dry, mine memory sideways: credits on rulebooks, logos on sprue trees, distributor lines in old catalogues, the small print on the back of a box. Spelling matters, so choose the form the maker actually uses. Breadth beats depth here, since a long list of distinct labels is what the reveal rewards.
Get a hint
Look at the small print on any box you still have at home: the maker credited on the corner or the copyright line, not the plaything itself.
A little more
Widen to niche producers: kit manufacturers, board game publishers, die-cast and model railway firms, plush workshops and designer toy studios all count as brands.
One step further
Go deeper into history and specialist corners: defunct twentieth-century manufacturers, regional labels and tiny art-toy imprints are just as valid and almost nobody names them.
Reveal answers 7,946
- Project Mc2Deep Cut85points
- Project R.E.D.Deep Cut85points
- Project XDeep Cut85points
- Projecto Rallye 43Deep Cut85points
- Prop & JetDeep Cut85points
- Propel RCDeep Cut85points
- PROPLICADeep Cut85points
- Prosto toysDeep Cut85points
- ProtarDeep Cut85points
- Proto 2000Deep Cut85points
- ProtocolDeep Cut85points
- Provence MoulageDeep Cut85points
- PSCDeep Cut85points
- PsilikokoDeep Cut85points
- PuckyDeep Cut85points
- Pudgy PenguinsDeep Cut85points
- PuffalumpsDeep Cut85points
- PuffkinsDeep Cut85points
- Pukka ToyDeep Cut85points
- PukyDeep Cut85points
- Pula MacacoDeep Cut85points
- PullipDeep Cut85points
- Puni GelDeep Cut85points
- Puni MaruDeep Cut85points
- PuniCommuDeep Cut85points
- PunirunesDeep Cut85points
- PunkiesDeep Cut85points
- Pupee BrinquedosDeep Cut85points
- Puppy in My PocketDeep Cut85points
- Puppy SurpriseDeep Cut85points
- Pure NeemoDeep Cut85points
- Purpose ToysDeep Cut85points
- Purr-tendersDeep Cut85points
- Purse PetsDeep Cut85points
- PustefixDeep Cut85points
- Puzz 3DDeep Cut85points
- Pyramid PowerDeep Cut85points
- PyraminxDeep Cut85points
- PyratesDeep Cut85points
- PyroDeep Cut85points
- PysslaDeep Cut85points
- PZWDeep Cut85points
- Q TrainDeep Cut85points
- Q VillageDeep Cut85points
- Q-Ba-MazeDeep Cut85points
- Q-BricksDeep Cut85points
- Q-JOYDeep Cut85points
- QabaDeep Cut85points
- Qai QaiDeep Cut85points
- QeeDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
With 7,872 recorded answers, this reveal behaves like a long tail rather than a short list. Almost everything that qualified landed at 85 points, which suggests the scoring rewards a distinct, correctly named maker rather than a household one; 7,453 entries sit in that band. Only 353 fell to 60, and those look like the ambiguous end of the spectrum, where a name doubles as a common word, a product type or a shop. A single answer reached 100: Bild Lilli, a mid-century doll whose existence is a genuine piece of toy history rather than a logo most players could produce under time pressure. Compare that with .hack//Enemy (85) or 5 Second Rule (85), both perfectly good picks that share the band with thousands of others. The lesson is that rarity only pays when the name still reads unmistakably as a brand: the one entry that felt like a find rather than a fixture took the top tier, while vague labels sank. Name something real and specific, then keep going.