Krillion Recorded answers
7,946 recorded answers
How to approach it
Work from the outside in. First list the names printed on packaging you have handled: the parent company, the studio, the imprint. Then push past the obvious few into adjacent categories, because the question covers dolls, construction sets, board games, card games, model kits, die-cast vehicles, plush and designer vinyl alike. Each of those worlds has its own publishers and workshops, and most of them are legitimate brand names. Once easy recall runs dry, mine memory sideways: credits on rulebooks, logos on sprue trees, distributor lines in old catalogues, the small print on the back of a box. Spelling matters, so choose the form the maker actually uses. Breadth beats depth here, since a long list of distinct labels is what the reveal rewards.
Get a hint
Look at the small print on any box you still have at home: the maker credited on the corner or the copyright line, not the plaything itself.
A little more
Widen to niche producers: kit manufacturers, board game publishers, die-cast and model railway firms, plush workshops and designer toy studios all count as brands.
One step further
Go deeper into history and specialist corners: defunct twentieth-century manufacturers, regional labels and tiny art-toy imprints are just as valid and almost nobody names them.
Reveal answers 7,946
- SantoysDeep Cut85points
- SanwaDeep Cut85points
- Sanwa PlasticDeep Cut85points
- SapecaDeep Cut85points
- SapientinoDeep Cut85points
- Sara and DaraDeep Cut85points
- Sarah's SilksDeep Cut85points
- SaraleeDeep Cut85points
- SarvisDeep Cut85points
- Sasha dollDeep Cut85points
- Sassi JuniorDeep Cut85points
- SassyDeep Cut85points
- Saturn ToysDeep Cut85points
- Satyr RoryDeep Cut85points
- Saucy WalkerDeep Cut85points
- Savage Mondo BlitzersDeep Cut85points
- Sawyer'sDeep Cut85points
- SbrodolinaDeep Cut85points
- Scale Model ProductsDeep Cut85points
- Scaled-RigsDeep Cut85points
- ScaleTrainsDeep Cut85points
- ScarygirlDeep Cut85points
- Scene It?Deep Cut85points
- SchabakDeep Cut85points
- SchaperDeep Cut85points
- SchenkDeep Cut85points
- SchichtDeep Cut85points
- SchildkrötDeep Cut85points
- Schmidt & RömerDeep Cut85points
- Schmidt SpieleDeep Cut85points
- Schnappt Hubi!Deep Cut85points
- SchoenhutDeep Cut85points
- Schreiber-BogenDeep Cut85points
- SchucoDeep Cut85points
- Schumacher RacingDeep Cut85points
- Schützmeister & QuendtDeep Cut85points
- Schwäbische CelluloidwarenfabrikDeep Cut85points
- SchweizerbaukastenDeep Cut85points
- SchyllingDeep Cut85points
- Science MadDeep Cut85points
- Science XDeep Cut85points
- Science4youDeep Cut85points
- Scientific ExplorerDeep Cut85points
- Scienza & GiocoDeep Cut85points
- Scooby-DooDeep Cut85points
- Scooby-Doo Expandable Card GameDeep Cut85points
- Scoot & RideDeep Cut85points
- ScorchersDeep Cut85points
- Score FourDeep Cut85points
- ScorpionsDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
With 7,872 recorded answers, this reveal behaves like a long tail rather than a short list. Almost everything that qualified landed at 85 points, which suggests the scoring rewards a distinct, correctly named maker rather than a household one; 7,453 entries sit in that band. Only 353 fell to 60, and those look like the ambiguous end of the spectrum, where a name doubles as a common word, a product type or a shop. A single answer reached 100: Bild Lilli, a mid-century doll whose existence is a genuine piece of toy history rather than a logo most players could produce under time pressure. Compare that with .hack//Enemy (85) or 5 Second Rule (85), both perfectly good picks that share the band with thousands of others. The lesson is that rarity only pays when the name still reads unmistakably as a brand: the one entry that felt like a find rather than a fixture took the top tier, while vague labels sank. Name something real and specific, then keep going.