Recorded answers
41,264 recorded answers
How to approach it
Build a candidate list in three passes. First, sweep the groups you already know and write down every species you can defend with a real dietary record. Second, push into the specialized literature — natural history notes, diet studies, museum species accounts — where the feeding habits of overlooked organisms are described in detail. Third, test each name against the wording of the question: is the insect feeding regular and documented, or merely possible? Keep the entries that survive, then choose the one you can defend most precisely at species level, because a specific, verifiable organism reads better than a broad label and stands out from the crowd of obvious submissions.
Get a hint
Begin with the whole animal kingdom rather than a shortlist of famous predators, and let dietary evidence — stomach contents, field notes, species accounts — decide which names deserve a place.
A little more
Then look for narrow specialization: creatures whose anatomy, activity cycle or hunting behaviour is built around capturing small prey, so the habit repeats across seasons instead of surfacing once.
One step further
Finish by sharpening the name to species level and checking that a published account confirms the diet, since a precise, verifiable entry is what lifts a response above the obvious crowd.
Reveal answers 41,264
- Lake DuckDeep Cut85points
- Lake EmeraldDeep Cut85points
- Lake Eyre DragonDeep Cut85points
- Lake Habbema Cross FrogDeep Cut85points
- Lake Isabella Trapdoor SpiderDeep Cut85points
- Lake Junin FrogDeep Cut85points
- Lake Kutubu mogurndaDeep Cut85points
- Lake Langano ToadDeep Cut85points
- Lake Lerma SalamanderDeep Cut85points
- Lake Malawi sardineDeep Cut85points
- Lake Malawi utakaDeep Cut85points
- Lake minnowDeep Cut85points
- Lake Mwero River FrogDeep Cut85points
- Lake Oku Clawed FrogDeep Cut85points
- Lake Oku Puddle FrogDeep Cut85points
- Lake Pátzcuaro SalamanderDeep Cut85points
- Lake Placid Funnel Wolf SpiderDeep Cut85points
- Lake pondskaterDeep Cut85points
- Lake Rudolf lampeyeDeep Cut85points
- Lake Rukwa lampeyeDeep Cut85points
- Lake Rukwa squeakerDeep Cut85points
- Lake Rukwa suckermouthDeep Cut85points
- Lake salmonDeep Cut85points
- Lake Sempach whitefishDeep Cut85points
- Lake skygazerDeep Cut85points
- Lake sturgeonDeep Cut85points
- Lake Tanganyika sardineDeep Cut85points
- Lake Tanganyika spratDeep Cut85points
- Lake tetraDeep Cut85points
- Lake Tumba dwarf spratDeep Cut85points
- Lake Turkana barbDeep Cut85points
- Lake Turkana minnowDeep Cut85points
- Lake Turkana sardineDeep Cut85points
- Lake Turkana ToadDeep Cut85points
- Lake Upemba Forest Tree FrogDeep Cut85points
- Lake Urmia NewtDeep Cut85points
- Lake Victoria Clawed FrogDeep Cut85points
- Lake Victoria deepwater catfishDeep Cut85points
- Lake Victoria squeakerDeep Cut85points
- Lake Victoria ToadDeep Cut85points
- Lake whitefishDeep Cut85points
- Lakekamu Pygmy TreefrogDeep Cut85points
- Laki Blind SnakeDeep Cut85points
- Laki dwarf geckoDeep Cut85points
- Laland's LizardDeep Cut85points
- Lalehzar RacerunnerDeep Cut85points
- Lally's Two-line DragonDeep Cut85points
- Lam Dong Bamboo Sticky FrogDeep Cut85points
- Lambert's Bay Sandveld LizardDeep Cut85points
- Lambert's coryDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
The scoring split is unusually lopsided. Of the 41,182 answers that cleared the top band, 40,754 earned 85 points, which means the puzzle treated almost every well-documented animal as equally valid — the reward came from finding something real, not from picking a household name. Rarity on its own bought nothing. The single 100-point entry, Bolas spider, shows what did pay: a specialist whose entire hunting method is built around insect prey, so the dietary claim is not merely true but vivid and specific. Names such as 15-spotted Money Spider, Abakapa Rain Frog or Abbott's Babbler sat in the 85-point group alongside thousands of others, well documented but not startling. The 427 answers at 60 points mark the lower edge of the top band, a reminder that a correct but predictable entry still trails the specialist tier. Practical reading: a precise species with a documented habit beats a broad, obvious label every time.