Recorded answers
30,029 recorded answers
How to approach it
Work from the smallest scale outward rather than trying to recall a single famous object. List the categories that can satisfy the size test — planets, natural satellites, stars, nebulae, clusters, galaxies — and then ask which members of each you can actually name with confidence. Anything with a catalogue number or a Bayer-style letter counts, so you are not restricted to household names; star catalogues alone supply thousands of valid answers. Weigh your options by how distinctive they are, not by how impressive they sound: a well-known giant is safe but widely shared, while an obscure survey object is harder to verify but far less crowded. Before committing, sanity-check the diameter against the lunar baseline so you do not lose the point on a technicality.
Get a hint
Begin at the scale you can picture without effort and then widen the frame, because the answer does not have to be something famous, only something real and large enough to be measured.
A little more
Then think in terms of catalogues, since most qualifying objects are not famous at all: they carry numbers, Greek letters or survey codes instead of memorable names.
One step further
Finally stretch the scale to its extremes, because the biggest candidates can be whole galaxies or gas clouds spanning many times the width of any planet, and those uncommon answers tend to be worth more.
Reveal answers 30,029
- HD 128333Deep Cut85points
- HD 128356Deep Cut85points
- HD 128356 bDeep Cut85points
- HD 128598Deep Cut85points
- HD 128717Deep Cut85points
- HD 129132Deep Cut85points
- HD 129357Deep Cut85points
- HD 129445Deep Cut85points
- HD 129445 bDeep Cut85points
- HD 129456Deep Cut85points
- HD 129685Deep Cut85points
- HD 129899Deep Cut85points
- HD 130084Deep Cut85points
- HD 130144Deep Cut85points
- HD 130458Deep Cut85points
- HD 130603Deep Cut85points
- HD 130917Deep Cut85points
- HD 130948Deep Cut85points
- HD 131040Deep Cut85points
- HD 131399Deep Cut85points
- HD 131425Deep Cut85points
- HD 131473Deep Cut85points
- HD 131551Deep Cut85points
- HD 131664Deep Cut85points
- HD 131664 bDeep Cut85points
- HD 13167Deep Cut85points
- HD 13167 bDeep Cut85points
- HD 13189Deep Cut85points
- HD 13189 bDeep Cut85points
- HD 132029Deep Cut85points
- HD 132406Deep Cut85points
- HD 132406 bDeep Cut85points
- HD 132563Deep Cut85points
- HD 132563 BDeep Cut85points
- HD 132563 B bDeep Cut85points
- HD 133002Deep Cut85points
- HD 133131Deep Cut85points
- HD 133131 ADeep Cut85points
- HD 133131 A bDeep Cut85points
- HD 133131 A cDeep Cut85points
- HD 133131 BDeep Cut85points
- HD 133131 B bDeep Cut85points
- HD 133600Deep Cut85points
- HD 133683Deep Cut85points
- HD 133880Deep Cut85points
- HD 133981Deep Cut85points
- HD 134060Deep Cut85points
- HD 134060 bDeep Cut85points
- HD 134060 cDeep Cut85points
- HD 134064Deep Cut85points
Why these answers count
The reveal held 30,029 recorded answers, and the distribution is unusually lopsided: a single entry at 100 points, 29,941 sitting at 85, and 72 scraping 60. That shape tells you most solvers converged on the same safe territory. The 85-point band is dominated by numbered stellar designations such as 1 Aquarii or 10 Andromedae — individually correct, trivially generated, and therefore shared by thousands of players, which caps their value. Bare catalogue codes behave the same way: 0313-192 and 037-B327 are perfectly valid picks, yet they still landed at 85, because hundreds of players reached for the same lists. The lone 100-point answer, Hanny's Voorwerp, is a different animal — a genuinely distinctive, almost quirky object that few would name unprompted, and the scoring rewarded that originality. Answers that fell to 60 were presumably vaguer or even more heavily repeated. The lesson: correctness gets you into the 85-point band, but only a memorable, unexpected object breaks past it.