Krillion Recorded answers
30,029 recorded answers
How to approach it
Work from the smallest scale outward rather than trying to recall a single famous object. List the categories that can satisfy the size test — planets, natural satellites, stars, nebulae, clusters, galaxies — and then ask which members of each you can actually name with confidence. Anything with a catalogue number or a Bayer-style letter counts, so you are not restricted to household names; star catalogues alone supply thousands of valid answers. Weigh your options by how distinctive they are, not by how impressive they sound: a well-known giant is safe but widely shared, while an obscure survey object is harder to verify but far less crowded. Before committing, sanity-check the diameter against the lunar baseline so you do not lose the point on a technicality.
Get a hint
Begin at the scale you can picture without effort and then widen the frame, because the answer does not have to be something famous, only something real and large enough to be measured.
A little more
Then think in terms of catalogues, since most qualifying objects are not famous at all: they carry numbers, Greek letters or survey codes instead of memorable names.
One step further
Finally stretch the scale to its extremes, because the biggest candidates can be whole galaxies or gas clouds spanning many times the width of any planet, and those uncommon answers tend to be worth more.
Reveal answers 30,029
- IC 2018Deep Cut85points
- IC 2019Deep Cut85points
- IC 202Deep Cut85points
- IC 2020Deep Cut85points
- IC 2021Deep Cut85points
- IC 2022Deep Cut85points
- IC 2023Deep Cut85points
- IC 2024Deep Cut85points
- IC 2025Deep Cut85points
- IC 2027Deep Cut85points
- IC 2028Deep Cut85points
- IC 2029Deep Cut85points
- IC 203Deep Cut85points
- IC 2031Deep Cut85points
- IC 2032Deep Cut85points
- IC 2033Deep Cut85points
- IC 2034Deep Cut85points
- IC 2035Deep Cut85points
- IC 2036Deep Cut85points
- IC 2037Deep Cut85points
- IC 2038Deep Cut85points
- IC 2039Deep Cut85points
- IC 204Deep Cut85points
- IC 2040Deep Cut85points
- IC 2041Deep Cut85points
- IC 2043Deep Cut85points
- IC 2044Deep Cut85points
- IC 2045Deep Cut85points
- IC 2046Deep Cut85points
- IC 2049Deep Cut85points
- IC 205Deep Cut85points
- IC 2050Deep Cut85points
- IC 2051Deep Cut85points
- IC 2052Deep Cut85points
- IC 2053Deep Cut85points
- IC 2054Deep Cut85points
- IC 2056Deep Cut85points
- IC 2057Deep Cut85points
- IC 2058Deep Cut85points
- IC 2059Deep Cut85points
- IC 206Deep Cut85points
- IC 2060Deep Cut85points
- IC 2063Deep Cut85points
- IC 2064Deep Cut85points
- IC 2065Deep Cut85points
- IC 2066Deep Cut85points
- IC 2067Deep Cut85points
- IC 2068Deep Cut85points
- IC 207Deep Cut85points
- IC 2070Deep Cut85points
Why these answers count
The reveal held 30,029 recorded answers, and the distribution is unusually lopsided: a single entry at 100 points, 29,941 sitting at 85, and 72 scraping 60. That shape tells you most solvers converged on the same safe territory. The 85-point band is dominated by numbered stellar designations such as 1 Aquarii or 10 Andromedae — individually correct, trivially generated, and therefore shared by thousands of players, which caps their value. Bare catalogue codes behave the same way: 0313-192 and 037-B327 are perfectly valid picks, yet they still landed at 85, because hundreds of players reached for the same lists. The lone 100-point answer, Hanny's Voorwerp, is a different animal — a genuinely distinctive, almost quirky object that few would name unprompted, and the scoring rewarded that originality. Answers that fell to 60 were presumably vaguer or even more heavily repeated. The lesson: correctness gets you into the 85-point band, but only a memorable, unexpected object breaks past it.