Recorded answers
30,029 recorded answers
How to approach it
Work from the smallest scale outward rather than trying to recall a single famous object. List the categories that can satisfy the size test — planets, natural satellites, stars, nebulae, clusters, galaxies — and then ask which members of each you can actually name with confidence. Anything with a catalogue number or a Bayer-style letter counts, so you are not restricted to household names; star catalogues alone supply thousands of valid answers. Weigh your options by how distinctive they are, not by how impressive they sound: a well-known giant is safe but widely shared, while an obscure survey object is harder to verify but far less crowded. Before committing, sanity-check the diameter against the lunar baseline so you do not lose the point on a technicality.
Get a hint
Begin at the scale you can picture without effort and then widen the frame, because the answer does not have to be something famous, only something real and large enough to be measured.
A little more
Then think in terms of catalogues, since most qualifying objects are not famous at all: they carry numbers, Greek letters or survey codes instead of memorable names.
One step further
Finally stretch the scale to its extremes, because the biggest candidates can be whole galaxies or gas clouds spanning many times the width of any planet, and those uncommon answers tend to be worth more.
Reveal answers 30,029
- IC 2401Deep Cut85points
- IC 2402Deep Cut85points
- IC 2403Deep Cut85points
- IC 2404Deep Cut85points
- IC 2405Deep Cut85points
- IC 2406Deep Cut85points
- IC 2407Deep Cut85points
- IC 2409Deep Cut85points
- IC 241Deep Cut85points
- IC 2414Deep Cut85points
- IC 2418Deep Cut85points
- IC 2420Deep Cut85points
- IC 2421Deep Cut85points
- IC 2422Deep Cut85points
- IC 2423Deep Cut85points
- IC 2426Deep Cut85points
- IC 2427Deep Cut85points
- IC 2428Deep Cut85points
- IC 2429Deep Cut85points
- IC 243Deep Cut85points
- IC 2430Deep Cut85points
- IC 2431Deep Cut85points
- IC 2432Deep Cut85points
- IC 2433Deep Cut85points
- IC 2434Deep Cut85points
- IC 2435Deep Cut85points
- IC 2437Deep Cut85points
- IC 2439Deep Cut85points
- IC 244Deep Cut85points
- IC 2441Deep Cut85points
- IC 2442Deep Cut85points
- IC 2443Deep Cut85points
- IC 2444Deep Cut85points
- IC 2445Deep Cut85points
- IC 2446Deep Cut85points
- IC 2448Deep Cut85points
- IC 245Deep Cut85points
- IC 2450Deep Cut85points
- IC 2451Deep Cut85points
- IC 2452Deep Cut85points
- IC 2453Deep Cut85points
- IC 2454Deep Cut85points
- IC 2456Deep Cut85points
- IC 2457Deep Cut85points
- IC 2459Deep Cut85points
- IC 246Deep Cut85points
- IC 2461Deep Cut85points
- IC 2462Deep Cut85points
- IC 2463Deep Cut85points
- IC 2464Deep Cut85points
Why these answers count
The reveal held 30,029 recorded answers, and the distribution is unusually lopsided: a single entry at 100 points, 29,941 sitting at 85, and 72 scraping 60. That shape tells you most solvers converged on the same safe territory. The 85-point band is dominated by numbered stellar designations such as 1 Aquarii or 10 Andromedae — individually correct, trivially generated, and therefore shared by thousands of players, which caps their value. Bare catalogue codes behave the same way: 0313-192 and 037-B327 are perfectly valid picks, yet they still landed at 85, because hundreds of players reached for the same lists. The lone 100-point answer, Hanny's Voorwerp, is a different animal — a genuinely distinctive, almost quirky object that few would name unprompted, and the scoring rewarded that originality. Answers that fell to 60 were presumably vaguer or even more heavily repeated. The lesson: correctness gets you into the 85-point band, but only a memorable, unexpected object breaks past it.