Recorded answers
30,029 recorded answers
How to approach it
Work from the smallest scale outward rather than trying to recall a single famous object. List the categories that can satisfy the size test — planets, natural satellites, stars, nebulae, clusters, galaxies — and then ask which members of each you can actually name with confidence. Anything with a catalogue number or a Bayer-style letter counts, so you are not restricted to household names; star catalogues alone supply thousands of valid answers. Weigh your options by how distinctive they are, not by how impressive they sound: a well-known giant is safe but widely shared, while an obscure survey object is harder to verify but far less crowded. Before committing, sanity-check the diameter against the lunar baseline so you do not lose the point on a technicality.
Get a hint
Begin at the scale you can picture without effort and then widen the frame, because the answer does not have to be something famous, only something real and large enough to be measured.
A little more
Then think in terms of catalogues, since most qualifying objects are not famous at all: they carry numbers, Greek letters or survey codes instead of memorable names.
One step further
Finally stretch the scale to its extremes, because the biggest candidates can be whole galaxies or gas clouds spanning many times the width of any planet, and those uncommon answers tend to be worth more.
Reveal answers 30,029
- IC 4252Deep Cut85points
- IC 4253Deep Cut85points
- IC 4254Deep Cut85points
- IC 4255Deep Cut85points
- IC 4256Deep Cut85points
- IC 4258Deep Cut85points
- IC 4259Deep Cut85points
- IC 426Deep Cut85points
- IC 4260Deep Cut85points
- IC 4261Deep Cut85points
- IC 4262Deep Cut85points
- IC 4263Deep Cut85points
- IC 4264Deep Cut85points
- IC 4265Deep Cut85points
- IC 4266Deep Cut85points
- IC 4267Deep Cut85points
- IC 4268Deep Cut85points
- IC 4269Deep Cut85points
- IC 427Deep Cut85points
- IC 4270Deep Cut85points
- IC 4271Deep Cut85points
- IC 4272Deep Cut85points
- IC 4273Deep Cut85points
- IC 4275Deep Cut85points
- IC 4276Deep Cut85points
- IC 4277Deep Cut85points
- IC 4278Deep Cut85points
- IC 4279Deep Cut85points
- IC 428Deep Cut85points
- IC 4280Deep Cut85points
- IC 4281Deep Cut85points
- IC 4282Deep Cut85points
- IC 4283Deep Cut85points
- IC 4284Deep Cut85points
- IC 4285Deep Cut85points
- IC 4286Deep Cut85points
- IC 4287Deep Cut85points
- IC 4288Deep Cut85points
- IC 4289Deep Cut85points
- IC 429Deep Cut85points
- IC 4290Deep Cut85points
- IC 4291Deep Cut85points
- IC 4292Deep Cut85points
- IC 4293Deep Cut85points
- IC 4294Deep Cut85points
- IC 4295Deep Cut85points
- IC 4296Deep Cut85points
- IC 4297Deep Cut85points
- IC 4298Deep Cut85points
- IC 4299Deep Cut85points
Why these answers count
The reveal held 30,029 recorded answers, and the distribution is unusually lopsided: a single entry at 100 points, 29,941 sitting at 85, and 72 scraping 60. That shape tells you most solvers converged on the same safe territory. The 85-point band is dominated by numbered stellar designations such as 1 Aquarii or 10 Andromedae — individually correct, trivially generated, and therefore shared by thousands of players, which caps their value. Bare catalogue codes behave the same way: 0313-192 and 037-B327 are perfectly valid picks, yet they still landed at 85, because hundreds of players reached for the same lists. The lone 100-point answer, Hanny's Voorwerp, is a different animal — a genuinely distinctive, almost quirky object that few would name unprompted, and the scoring rewarded that originality. Answers that fell to 60 were presumably vaguer or even more heavily repeated. The lesson: correctness gets you into the 85-point band, but only a memorable, unexpected object breaks past it.