Krillion Recorded answers
30,029 recorded answers
How to approach it
Work from the smallest scale outward rather than trying to recall a single famous object. List the categories that can satisfy the size test — planets, natural satellites, stars, nebulae, clusters, galaxies — and then ask which members of each you can actually name with confidence. Anything with a catalogue number or a Bayer-style letter counts, so you are not restricted to household names; star catalogues alone supply thousands of valid answers. Weigh your options by how distinctive they are, not by how impressive they sound: a well-known giant is safe but widely shared, while an obscure survey object is harder to verify but far less crowded. Before committing, sanity-check the diameter against the lunar baseline so you do not lose the point on a technicality.
Get a hint
Begin at the scale you can picture without effort and then widen the frame, because the answer does not have to be something famous, only something real and large enough to be measured.
A little more
Then think in terms of catalogues, since most qualifying objects are not famous at all: they carry numbers, Greek letters or survey codes instead of memorable names.
One step further
Finally stretch the scale to its extremes, because the biggest candidates can be whole galaxies or gas clouds spanning many times the width of any planet, and those uncommon answers tend to be worth more.
Reveal answers 30,029
- IC 4349Deep Cut85points
- IC 435Deep Cut85points
- IC 4350Deep Cut85points
- IC 4351Deep Cut85points
- IC 4352Deep Cut85points
- IC 4354Deep Cut85points
- IC 4355Deep Cut85points
- IC 4356Deep Cut85points
- IC 4357Deep Cut85points
- IC 4358Deep Cut85points
- IC 4359Deep Cut85points
- IC 4360Deep Cut85points
- IC 4361Deep Cut85points
- IC 4362Deep Cut85points
- IC 4363Deep Cut85points
- IC 4364Deep Cut85points
- IC 4366Deep Cut85points
- IC 4367Deep Cut85points
- IC 4368Deep Cut85points
- IC 4369Deep Cut85points
- IC 437Deep Cut85points
- IC 4370Deep Cut85points
- IC 4371Deep Cut85points
- IC 4372Deep Cut85points
- IC 4373Deep Cut85points
- IC 4374Deep Cut85points
- IC 4377Deep Cut85points
- IC 4378Deep Cut85points
- IC 4379Deep Cut85points
- IC 438Deep Cut85points
- IC 4380Deep Cut85points
- IC 4382Deep Cut85points
- IC 4384Deep Cut85points
- IC 4386Deep Cut85points
- IC 4387Deep Cut85points
- IC 4388Deep Cut85points
- IC 4389Deep Cut85points
- IC 4390Deep Cut85points
- IC 4391Deep Cut85points
- IC 4393Deep Cut85points
- IC 4395Deep Cut85points
- IC 4396Deep Cut85points
- IC 4397Deep Cut85points
- IC 4398Deep Cut85points
- IC 4399Deep Cut85points
- IC 440Deep Cut85points
- IC 4401Deep Cut85points
- IC 4402Deep Cut85points
- IC 4403Deep Cut85points
- IC 4405Deep Cut85points
Why these answers count
The reveal held 30,029 recorded answers, and the distribution is unusually lopsided: a single entry at 100 points, 29,941 sitting at 85, and 72 scraping 60. That shape tells you most solvers converged on the same safe territory. The 85-point band is dominated by numbered stellar designations such as 1 Aquarii or 10 Andromedae — individually correct, trivially generated, and therefore shared by thousands of players, which caps their value. Bare catalogue codes behave the same way: 0313-192 and 037-B327 are perfectly valid picks, yet they still landed at 85, because hundreds of players reached for the same lists. The lone 100-point answer, Hanny's Voorwerp, is a different animal — a genuinely distinctive, almost quirky object that few would name unprompted, and the scoring rewarded that originality. Answers that fell to 60 were presumably vaguer or even more heavily repeated. The lesson: correctness gets you into the 85-point band, but only a memorable, unexpected object breaks past it.