Recorded answers
30,029 recorded answers
How to approach it
Work from the smallest scale outward rather than trying to recall a single famous object. List the categories that can satisfy the size test — planets, natural satellites, stars, nebulae, clusters, galaxies — and then ask which members of each you can actually name with confidence. Anything with a catalogue number or a Bayer-style letter counts, so you are not restricted to household names; star catalogues alone supply thousands of valid answers. Weigh your options by how distinctive they are, not by how impressive they sound: a well-known giant is safe but widely shared, while an obscure survey object is harder to verify but far less crowded. Before committing, sanity-check the diameter against the lunar baseline so you do not lose the point on a technicality.
Get a hint
Begin at the scale you can picture without effort and then widen the frame, because the answer does not have to be something famous, only something real and large enough to be measured.
A little more
Then think in terms of catalogues, since most qualifying objects are not famous at all: they carry numbers, Greek letters or survey codes instead of memorable names.
One step further
Finally stretch the scale to its extremes, because the biggest candidates can be whole galaxies or gas clouds spanning many times the width of any planet, and those uncommon answers tend to be worth more.
Reveal answers 30,029
- IC 4993Deep Cut85points
- IC 4994Deep Cut85points
- IC 4995Deep Cut85points
- IC 4996Deep Cut85points
- IC 4997Deep Cut85points
- IC 4998Deep Cut85points
- IC 4999Deep Cut85points
- IC 5Deep Cut85points
- IC 50Deep Cut85points
- IC 500Deep Cut85points
- IC 5001Deep Cut85points
- IC 5002Deep Cut85points
- IC 5003Deep Cut85points
- IC 5005Deep Cut85points
- IC 5007Deep Cut85points
- IC 5008Deep Cut85points
- IC 5009Deep Cut85points
- IC 501Deep Cut85points
- IC 5010Deep Cut85points
- IC 5011Deep Cut85points
- IC 5012Deep Cut85points
- IC 5014Deep Cut85points
- IC 5016Deep Cut85points
- IC 5017Deep Cut85points
- IC 5019Deep Cut85points
- IC 502Deep Cut85points
- IC 5020Deep Cut85points
- IC 5021Deep Cut85points
- IC 5022Deep Cut85points
- IC 5023Deep Cut85points
- IC 5024Deep Cut85points
- IC 5025Deep Cut85points
- IC 5026Deep Cut85points
- IC 5027Deep Cut85points
- IC 5028Deep Cut85points
- IC 503Deep Cut85points
- IC 5031Deep Cut85points
- IC 5032Deep Cut85points
- IC 5033Deep Cut85points
- IC 5034Deep Cut85points
- IC 5035Deep Cut85points
- IC 5036Deep Cut85points
- IC 5037Deep Cut85points
- IC 5038Deep Cut85points
- IC 504Deep Cut85points
- IC 5040Deep Cut85points
- IC 5042Deep Cut85points
- IC 5043Deep Cut85points
- IC 5044Deep Cut85points
- IC 5045Deep Cut85points
Why these answers count
The reveal held 30,029 recorded answers, and the distribution is unusually lopsided: a single entry at 100 points, 29,941 sitting at 85, and 72 scraping 60. That shape tells you most solvers converged on the same safe territory. The 85-point band is dominated by numbered stellar designations such as 1 Aquarii or 10 Andromedae — individually correct, trivially generated, and therefore shared by thousands of players, which caps their value. Bare catalogue codes behave the same way: 0313-192 and 037-B327 are perfectly valid picks, yet they still landed at 85, because hundreds of players reached for the same lists. The lone 100-point answer, Hanny's Voorwerp, is a different animal — a genuinely distinctive, almost quirky object that few would name unprompted, and the scoring rewarded that originality. Answers that fell to 60 were presumably vaguer or even more heavily repeated. The lesson: correctness gets you into the 85-point band, but only a memorable, unexpected object breaks past it.