Recorded answers
30,029 recorded answers
How to approach it
Work from the smallest scale outward rather than trying to recall a single famous object. List the categories that can satisfy the size test — planets, natural satellites, stars, nebulae, clusters, galaxies — and then ask which members of each you can actually name with confidence. Anything with a catalogue number or a Bayer-style letter counts, so you are not restricted to household names; star catalogues alone supply thousands of valid answers. Weigh your options by how distinctive they are, not by how impressive they sound: a well-known giant is safe but widely shared, while an obscure survey object is harder to verify but far less crowded. Before committing, sanity-check the diameter against the lunar baseline so you do not lose the point on a technicality.
Get a hint
Begin at the scale you can picture without effort and then widen the frame, because the answer does not have to be something famous, only something real and large enough to be measured.
A little more
Then think in terms of catalogues, since most qualifying objects are not famous at all: they carry numbers, Greek letters or survey codes instead of memorable names.
One step further
Finally stretch the scale to its extremes, because the biggest candidates can be whole galaxies or gas clouds spanning many times the width of any planet, and those uncommon answers tend to be worth more.
Reveal answers 30,029
- IX CarinaeDeep Cut85points
- IxbalanquéDeep Cut85points
- IZ AquariiDeep Cut85points
- IzarDeep Cut85points
- IztokDeep Cut85points
- J CentauriDeep Cut85points
- J VelorumDeep Cut85points
- J080107.90+435030.6Deep Cut85points
- J082504.56+315957.0Deep Cut85points
- J094700.09+254045.8Deep Cut85points
- J1000+0221Deep Cut85points
- J1000+1242Deep Cut85points
- J1010+0612Deep Cut85points
- J1017+6352Deep Cut85points
- J10405643–0103584Deep Cut85points
- J1144-4308Deep Cut85points
- J114403.9+440022.0Deep Cut85points
- J120011.1+680924.8Deep Cut85points
- J1223+5409Deep Cut85points
- J1328+2752Deep Cut85points
- J1407bDeep Cut85points
- J171328.4+274336.6Deep Cut85points
- J1953−1019Deep Cut85points
- J2341+0018Deep Cut85points
- J2345-0449Deep Cut85points
- JabbahDeep Cut85points
- Jackpot NebulaDeep Cut85points
- Jacoby 1Deep Cut85points
- JADES-GS-z10-0Deep Cut85points
- JADES-GS-z12-0Deep Cut85points
- JADES-GS-z13-0Deep Cut85points
- JADES-GS-z13-1Deep Cut85points
- JADES-GS-z14-0Deep Cut85points
- JADES-GS-z14-1Deep Cut85points
- JADES-GS-z7-01-QUDeep Cut85points
- JADES-ID1Deep Cut85points
- JaFu 1Deep Cut85points
- JanssenDeep Cut85points
- Janus (star)Deep Cut85points
- JebusDeep Cut85points
- Jellyfish NebulaDeep Cut85points
- Jewel BoxDeep Cut85points
- Jewel Bug NebulaDeep Cut85points
- JianDeep Cut85points
- JiantaiDeep Cut85points
- JishuiDeep Cut85points
- JiuDeep Cut85points
- JKCS 041Deep Cut85points
- Jonckheere 320Deep Cut85points
- Jonckheere 900Deep Cut85points
Why these answers count
The reveal held 30,029 recorded answers, and the distribution is unusually lopsided: a single entry at 100 points, 29,941 sitting at 85, and 72 scraping 60. That shape tells you most solvers converged on the same safe territory. The 85-point band is dominated by numbered stellar designations such as 1 Aquarii or 10 Andromedae — individually correct, trivially generated, and therefore shared by thousands of players, which caps their value. Bare catalogue codes behave the same way: 0313-192 and 037-B327 are perfectly valid picks, yet they still landed at 85, because hundreds of players reached for the same lists. The lone 100-point answer, Hanny's Voorwerp, is a different animal — a genuinely distinctive, almost quirky object that few would name unprompted, and the scoring rewarded that originality. Answers that fell to 60 were presumably vaguer or even more heavily repeated. The lesson: correctness gets you into the 85-point band, but only a memorable, unexpected object breaks past it.